If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
tories propose going back to norm referencing for a levels
Former Member
Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/3750726.stm
the tories havejust lost any potential votes from people who know anything about exams
the tories havejust lost any potential votes from people who know anything about exams
0
Comments
the tories never know what they want, they just grasp at ideas they think might be popular but this one is just plain stupid.
:eek2: Where is the incentive for people to work hard then?
well the fact you need to beat people in your year is the goal, thats it - if your in a thick year lucky you, if your in a clever year, ur screwed, and noone will accept claim "im in a clever year"
Otherwise private school pupils who’ve done the IB will get another advantage over state school pupils who mostly do a-levels.
i know for certain courses like law and medicine some uni's have aptitude tests for new entries, this is a good solution i think and it sorts out the good from the great.
isnt there such a thing as interviews to do that... how i got accpeted to all my unis even tohugh i wa sjust below what they normally want
when 1000 people get 4 A's and apply to a course with 250 spaces in it, a test is going to be more useful than an interview.
how is it theyve proved they can all do test/exams already, sure it can be useful still but there are other ways which differentiate those who learn like robots to those who have a more natural understanding which is what universities want
also a thing as personal statements and people taking different subjects, youll find the amount of people taking up the classically more demanding subjects has fallen, which tend to be best ones for studying at uni even if you arent doing them directly
everyone knows that man, i think even pointing out that the pope was catholic would have been less silly than that statement
no its not called adversarial, its called partisan politics
no they wont, they only differ themselves when they know the government are wrong, cause if theres something that has mass public support, the shadow govt dont want to lose public support
It's a random tangent, but here's a little bit of gossip for you.
The Durham law tutors tried out the aptitude tests in February, and half of the law department's tutors failed it
I thought it was wonderful!
Criterion refencing is far better, and it should never be forgotten that even in this style of marking if too many people are getting As then the presuimption is that the exam was too easy, and the level of marks required to get a grade is raised.
I actually agree with having a fixed proportion getting a A grade. What is the point of A-Levels if not to separate different academic abilities?
Yes but if it was 'easy' to get an A then everyone would have one. Only about 20% of students get an A grade, and the average grade is a D or something...so A Levels can't be 'easy'
If I were a swearing man, I may say: Fuck. Sake.