If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
british rail ...someone please explain!
Former Member
Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
to me ...what was the logic behind privatisation when everyone knew it couldn't make money.
what are the arguments against renationilising the thing ...please!
the private sector don't seem to be putting the quids in ...the public are. the private sector and it's shareholders are though taking money out of it ...does this actualy make any sense to anyone? i'm buggered if i can see any reason or excuse for it to stay in private ownership ...pleeeease ...someone with free market ideals ...defend the current situation and the original purpose of privatising the fucking thing!
what are the arguments against renationilising the thing ...please!
the private sector don't seem to be putting the quids in ...the public are. the private sector and it's shareholders are though taking money out of it ...does this actualy make any sense to anyone? i'm buggered if i can see any reason or excuse for it to stay in private ownership ...pleeeease ...someone with free market ideals ...defend the current situation and the original purpose of privatising the fucking thing!
0
Comments
It cannot be justified.
And anyone who complains that the trains are a shambles and yet votes Conservative is, in my opinion, a clueless idiot.
did i hear right on the radio ...that share holders are taking one and a half billion pound a year out of the system in proffit? that can't be right surely. if it is, it sounds like a deliberate plan to destroy britains railways.
a friend has just come back from a couple of months in india ...was very impressed with the trains ...
The trouble with re-privatisation is that it would be far too costly. The train operating companies could easily be re-integrated, Network rail the same; the trouble is that the trains themselves are owned by such luminaries as the HSBC, who bought them way below market value and charge horrific rental costs. For instance, a Class 142 "pacer" unit cost about £250,000 to buy new at todays prices, yet to rent one for a year from HSBC costs the TOCs £150,000. major sold it to HSBC for about £50,000.
And Aladdin, I dont think its strictly a Tory thing. My Blair seems to liek privatisation too, he just gievs it a snazzy name and makes it so convoluted no bugegr can understand it.
Many privately owned tourist railways are run very successfully and some even make a profit and can afford paid staff. However, they are run by people who want to run trains, not by people who want to make a profit. Perhaps the idea of a not-for-profit Network Rail isn't a bad one, but at the same time they must try to not make a loss either.
There is one fundamental principle that must be taken into account when talking about public services: the main (and in most cases only) aim of a private company is to make the maximum amount of profit possible for its CEOs and shareholders.
This is really the only thing we need to know. A private company will always put the interests of shareholders first. Therefore compromising safety, investment, comfort, etc etc. And therefore making private companies totally unfit to run any sort of public services.
In the case of the railways there have been too many cases too narrate: suffice to say that people have died as a direct result of the greed mentality of private companies, and it's only too much of a shame that those responsible are not rotting in jail, like they would be in most other countries in Europe.
New Labour should be ashamed of themselves, after all their promises of re-nationalising the railways if they came to power.
But the main blame must no doubt fall on the Tories, guilty not only of depriving the railways of vital funding through decades (though Labour does not come out smelling of roses either) but also of the disgusting death sentence that privatisation was.
I should not go into detail about how incredibly damaging privatisation has been. I'm sure everyone can work it out for themselves.
£150,000 for a Class 142! One of the oldest train units in operations, arguably in the worst condition. I hate to think how much these newer units are costing them!
As far as I am aware Gatwick Express and WAGN also pay premiums to the Treasury for the privilege of running trains. Virgin should be paying £60million to the Treasury each year, yet somehow theyre getting £100million subsidy due to a re-negotiation.
With GNER in particular it shows have privatisation SHOULD have worked. GNER have refurbished their fleet, started running more trains and more often, with some new (well, cascaded Eurostar stock) trains, AND they pay £20million a year to the Government. I find it amusing though that GNER are paying their competitor Virgin money to cpmpete against them- just one of lifes little ironies.
Random tangent: Virgin Rail is 49% owned by Stagecoach. Stagecoach has made a £400million loss last year. The head of the SRA's father-in-law is a significant shareholder in Stagecoach. The SRA agreed to Virgin's bollocksy new trains, and to giving them £100million a year to pay for them. Conflict of interest...where?
I know, a train based on a bus body that was scrapped five years ago, and it costs £150k to rent one ofr a year.
And people wonder why the privatised railway industry sucks cock...
Both parties are as bad as each other. The cuts in the 1960s by Dr Beeching were made by, and under, a Labour government- those cuts cut the railway network by about 50%. Although the SRA again would now want to cut everything except Virgin Trains, to say its a death knell, in comparison to Beeching, is a bit silly.
Labour have done the most damage to the railway network if youre to take it all in comparison, though people dont remember any of this.
That is my main argument as well - you've saved the the trouble of typing it all out, thanks!
Sadly, I suspect if they were all nationalised again, we'd still have the same problems.
Certainly makes you wonder, and certain proves its all about the money not the customers.
I was suprised that they were still going, since its ages since the 141's went, but one was in Leeds on a Carlisle t'other day.
Some 141s have been sold to Iran, and I believe some will be going to the North Norfolk railway. However the 142s are still alive and kicking (unfortunately). I have travelled on 142s and they really are horrible. Slow, uncomfortable, and noisy, I would rather travel on a 101! True. The structure that existed before 1948 worked fine, then Labour nationalised the system. It was all downhill from there.