Komrad Klinton's treason

Former Member

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/9/29/25139.shtml

The legacy that President Clinton left for the 21st century is a modern Chinese army equipped for global nuclear war.

Former Member

Military secrets are the most fleeting of all. Clinton is guilty of stupidity but not treason. Strategic Defense Initiative technology is being developed quite secretly as I write this. A first strike by the Chinese would assure the end of the Chinese as a race of people. American missiles are based in a triad system. The Chinese have not yet reached this stage.

Be advised that since the introduction of the H-Bomb the US military complex has developed other scary things which the Chinese are not even imagining in their wildest dreams. Attacking the US would be sure suicide for China and or anyone else in the world.

Do you really think Bill was in charge of everyting?:D Next thing you'll be blaming him for global warming. WHat kills me is that the left and the right are full of zealots who think they are 100% right and that any other opinion is wrong and evil!

MAybe the military industrial complex needs enemies! Shades of Orwell!:yes:

Former Member

Id been waiting for Thanatos to start up this nonsense again. Seems our unquestioning right wing sycophant should add Beijing Bush to his list of "traitors"..

http://www.conservativeusa.org/bushwatch.htm

ARE TECH TRANSFERS TO RED CHINA WORSE UNDER BUSH?

"The Bush administration has been ‘as bad, if not worse’ than the Clinton administration when it comes to the transfer of sensitive technologies to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), claims Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, a nonpartisan public-interest law firm. Fitton says the Bush administration even has ‘relaxed the rules put in place during the Clinton years.’ Specifically, he tells Insight, the administration has allowed the transfer of ‘computer technology [whose] only practical purpose is for nuclear-weapon design.’ Fitton says that from the beginning the administration went ‘full-speed ahead’ with China trade and efforts to get the PRC into the World Trade Organization (WTO), which Fitton tells Insight only gives China more opportunities to modernize its military and ‘get cash’ with which to buy high-tech weapons elsewhere."

DUBYA BUSH OPENS WIDER BILL CLINTON’S BARN DOOR

"While few have gone so far as Fitton with such complaints, criticism of U.S. transfers of sensitive technology to China is growing. Accuracy in Media, another Washington watchdog group, echoes Fitton on computer-technology transfers: ‘President Bush seems to have no clearer vision of what constitutes a strategically sensitive export than did Clinton. For example, Republicans harshly condemned Clinton for exporting high-performance computers to China, but President Bush has more than doubled the control threshold on these computers despite existing intelligence estimates that demonstrate how China’s national security benefits from such acquisitions.’

"Indeed, in his last days as lame-duck president Clinton made exports of U.S. supercomputers easier by raising the export threshold from 28,000 millions of theoretical operations per second (MTOPS) to 85,000 MTOPS. Bush raised that limit to 190,000 MTOPS. A General Accounting Office (GAO) official tells Insight that the government hadn’t done the necessary pre-export analysis and that an ‘interagency process’ led by the Department of Defense should be in place for export controls."

NATIONAL SECURITY IMPLICATIONS SET ASIDE WITHOUT REVIEW

"An April 2002 report by the GAO on computer-chip technology transfers to China claims that the government did not do an adequate analysis of the cumulative national-security effects of chip exports to China either, and that most export applications are simply approved. The policy is to approve applications unless it is shown that the items in question ‘would make a direct and significant contribution to electronic and antisubmarine warfare, intelligence gathering, power projection and air superiority.’

"Never mind that, as a Pentagon official told the GAO, these chips can be used to improve China’s capabilities for pre-emptive long-range precision strikes, information dominance, command and control and integrated air defense. …"

TOP DOD OFFICIAL UNDER GWB LOBBIED FOR LORAL UNDER CLINTON

"The administration is known to be full of Cold Warriors, and the Pentagon is led by Donald Rumsfeld, the most hawkish secretary of defense since Caspar Weinberger. Yet Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Doug Feith, in his former role as a private-sector attorney, helped move technology transfers as a lawyer for Loral Space & Communications Ltd., one of the two U.S. companies (the other one being Hughes Electronics Corp.) that contributed to the dramatic improvement of Chinese space-launch and satellite capabilities after large contributions to Clinton Democrats. When contacted by Insight, Feith’s office would not address the technology-transfer issue."

CLINTONISTAS BLOCKED ISRAELI TECH AID TO BEIJING; GWB LOOKS THE OTHER WAY

"Fisher, who is editor of the Jamestown Foundation’s fortnightly China Brief, also gives credit where one wouldn’t expect it. ‘For all of its actions that aided the transfer of dual-use technologies that helped PLA [People’s Liberation Army] modernization, the Clinton administration did endure a political storm to stop Israel’s sale of the advanced PHALCON aerial radar to the PLA. The Bush administration has said little to nothing about Israel’s more recent sale of communication satellites to the PRC, which definitely will be used by the PLA, or about the much more serious threat of Russian weapons and military-technology sales to the PRC.’ …"

further reading:
http://www.insightmag.com/main.cfm/include/detail/storyid/257504.html


Seems your lack of scrutiny of your heroic administration has left you face down in your own hypocrisy stew yet again.

Former Member

Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.............

Cold War strategies won't wash in the 21st century.......

The best way to avoid war with China is by being Chinas friend. The ideological differences are slowly evaporating also as China moves towards the free-market........

Former Member

Just highlighting the constant drivel about treason eminating from our long recognised apologist for the unquestioning right.

Its all a storm in a tea cup compared to the broader issues of weapons proliferation which we (US/Europe) continue to perpetrate the world over whilst villifying anyone else from doing.

Must be the last desperate tactic of our respective MIC's to corner the global market. Don't the like the competition? Call them terrorists or rogue states and bomb them into perdition.

What a wonderful precedent for furthering world peace, eh?