If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Should we keep the 'thanks' reaction?
This discussion has been closed.
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
And to be honest if people have voted keep it, then it's only fair they go with what the majority have voted for to make it fair to everyone.
I dont feel the need for this debate really
And yeah i like the hugs button too. But to just make it clearer what you just said - you're saying people may just not bother to say thanks without that reaction there?
I just want to finally say - it looks like it is there because no one would bother to say thanks otherwise & sounds like thats the reason it's there too. & I appercated people with a thanks/thank you without that reaction.
If I want to say thanks, I would, even if that reaction wasn't there.
but is what it is. Bit pointless but oh well. I don't think many see from my point of view which is fine
This is just extremely frustrating as I feel like I'm being judged and disliked for wanting to keep a reaction I like and do use. I use it because it's polite. I use it because I don't want to Spam the hug thread or my own threads with "thanks" comments and then lose the actual comments that matter like the support.. having everyone write thanks in the hug thread will just clog up pages and people can't offered support if they miss posts due to it being spammed with thanks replies.
Threads will become more about balancing out thank you comments against comments of support.
Instead of focusing on support.
hugs and and agree are completly different to thanks. In my opinion. We say thanks in our everyday life - we can say that more stiaght forward ourselves. We shouldnt need prompting to be poilet.
The thanks reaction hasnt existed for ages - ive never seen spams of "thanks".
With threads - someone replies - nearly everytime i say thanks and then carry on with what i wanna say. Never seen as spam. I get whatbyou say with the hugs thread - say someone says hugs to everyone - we dont all nessicaly need to comment "thank you" some things can be actknowdlgeded without saying thanks.
Spam is unwanted content - thanks doesnt seem unwanted imo. It seems welcoming and people showing gratitue
I just imagine facebook adding a thanks reactions and people being like "wtf i do not need prompting to say thanks".
Reactions are things like hugs & agreeing is a reaction - saying thanks isnt a reaction its something we should say.
Not that i would be ungrateful if someone put thanks reaction to me. But just dont see point of it existing
But yeah now i have said everything i need to say lol
I, like many of us, remember a time pre-reactions and, certainly on long threads like the rant thread and hugs thread, it often felt sort of one-sided and I often wondered if anyone even read what I had posted if they didn’t reply - and I was certainly guilty of reading a post, not having time to reply in that moment, and then forgetting to reply at all. Reactions mean that the long threads are more interactive and, simply put, they are just sometimes more convenient than writing a response.
Also pre-reactions, threads were often full of posts simply saying ‘thanks’, ‘agreed’ or ‘*hugs*’. There’s nothing wrong with saying these things, but I often found that it made threads longer and therefore less likely to read all of them if you get what I mean - and I like to read the whole thread before replying so I can have full context.
So overall I find all the reactions helpful, including the thanks one. But it wouldn’t stop me responding if I felt a post or posts needed it.