If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
Bush on Nukes
Former Member
Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
President Bush said he would not tolerate nuclear weapons in Iran. quote from bush.
"The international community must come together to make it very clear that we will not tolerate construction of a nuclear weapon.
Iran is thought to be developing nuclear weapons, though the government denies it.
The US believes Iran has an advanced missile programme and ties to terrorist groups, including Al-Qaeda.
Is Iran next on this chimp's list?
What about N.Korea, they openly admit they are making nuclear weapons but there isn't much talk about them...it seems that America only want to attack smaller and weaker nations than themselves..it wouldn't be such an easy battle if they attacked N.Korea.
"The international community must come together to make it very clear that we will not tolerate construction of a nuclear weapon.
Iran is thought to be developing nuclear weapons, though the government denies it.
The US believes Iran has an advanced missile programme and ties to terrorist groups, including Al-Qaeda.
Is Iran next on this chimp's list?
What about N.Korea, they openly admit they are making nuclear weapons but there isn't much talk about them...it seems that America only want to attack smaller and weaker nations than themselves..it wouldn't be such an easy battle if they attacked N.Korea.
0
Comments
This looks familiar, I wonder where I could have seen it before...are they recycling the same press releases that they used for the war in Iraq, but with Iran as the subject instead?
Seriously though yes North Korea is probably the biggest threat. However are the US Government not doing anything because it is a bit close to home?
That would seem more a reason to attack N.Korea rather than not...
well if buch goes into north korea, nk will nuke america and we will have a nuclear war.
some ancient philosopher once forsaw the beginning of the world on 11/9/2001 so clearly bush is just trying to fulfil this prophesy...explained
:nervous:
Maybe so and i say great, let america get nuked,deserve them right
Who knows?
blair will join in and britain will get nuked as well, oh and bush will use it as an excuse to press all his red button in his "secret bunker beneath the white house" (great secret) and nuke every country in the world before nuking the us before anyone else so he can have the satisfaction of blowing his own country up
Neither did Iraq and neither does Iran..
Bush is doing what he can to protect us...and our allies. No Iran doesn't have nuclear weapons now...that's his point. If we wait too long, then you have another North Korea on your hands only with nutty Muslim extremists running.
Sorry, but people who believe they can meet and please their God through suicide attacks aren't the kind of people I want having nuclear weapons. What part of this are you not getting?
Grow up you ignorant sod, you only spout off about Iran (which I doubt you even knew existed before it started being discussed on Fox News) because youve been told its an Al Qaeda hideout. Frankly to Bush and co, anywhere where they want to invade to grab more oil will be an Al Qaeda stronghold.
If you had a news channel with half the quality and substance of reporting as the BBC youd perhaps actually know the truth of whats going on in the world.
Such a dupe you are! :rolleyes:
Note: Id call everyone's attention (those who have listened to pnj's drivel for any length of time) to recall what he previously used to repeat endlessly about British character! Now this pnj slags off the BBC as rubbish???
Methinks we have the Jock back using pnj's account. The neaderthilic tone of these recent posts point heavily in that direction!
To protect you?If America didnt go around attacking places they wouldnt have as many enemies and wouldn't be as prone to attacks as they are now, just remember you are a brainwashed small minded individual.
No Bush said he believed Iran were developing them right now in the present. Another N.Korea?Then why dont America invade it and destory their country and way of life as well pnj?
Are you racist?
What part of this am i not getting, they are hardly going to attack you anyway and even if they did good luck pnj, we wont be hearing from you on hear then.
I doubt very much the US would "crush" North Korea without resorting to using nuclear weapons. The N-Koreans have one of the largest armed forces on the planet, and China to back them up, which despuite what they say, they will do. China would hate seeing a bigger US presence in the area. Unlike Iraq and Afghanistan, North Korea is quite capable of defending itself, thanks to its thousands of tanks and Jets, a lot of them being very new models. Yes, America would win, but it wouldn't be an easy victory, and would probably see the annihilation of South Korea, and the West coast of the USA.
Korea is also quite capable of delivering a nuclear warhead to the West Coast of the US, which is why America is worried. But, what does Bush do? He completely ignores the threat, and instead starts gunning for Iran, yes they may be able to develop nukes, but the most they can do is strap one on to someone's back.
Since its already been demonstrated that the Bush admin can so easily plunder control of oil reserves in Iraq and (via Afghanistan) in Central Asia for the benefit of our oil companies future profits, "why stop there" is the thinking that lies behind the next juicy target actively being primed by the media for assault.
What's alarmingly apparent to those who take time to put two and two together when watching reports of protests in Iraq against our US presence and those in Iran against the mullahs, is that whilst the Iraqi protestors are villified for wanting us out (and in numerous cases now, shot dead by our soldiers), the Iranian protestors are hailed as wonderful fighters for liberty.
Does anyone else note the hypocrisy of presentation here? Or are "liberators" free to shoot protestors dead when other govts elsewhere are called brutal for doing the same thing?