Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options

Stop The Arms Fair!

2»

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Moonkat:
    I uses Ali’s comments as an example of how the working classes are made to fight by their rulers rather than having to fight to defend themselves.

    Cassius Clay was not made to fight at all. In fact, he made a choice not to do so, and went to jail instead. One of the things I admire the man for. But he made the choice, no one forced him into it.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Steelgate:
    All arms sales are wrong, all arms sales are for the profit of a few.

    All wars are fought for the interests of the ruling class, that includes every war that has ever been fought including world war two. World war two was the same as any other war, caused by economic competition between the German ruling class and the British ruling class.

    The working class of every country has far more in common with each other than with their rulers. The workers who go to fight in wars are told they are fighting for their country. Yet the land, the factories and vast majority of the wealth of a country is not owned by the workers but by a small capitalist elite, who use the workers to fight their wars.

    That is why all wars are wrong, and why workers of different countries should not fight in them. Instead they should fight the reall enemy capitalism.


    The politics of division? Class warfare? Replace nationalism with classes, all that the "dilectic" really does. Wake up. If you put half as much energy into your life as you do into this argument, you'd find capitalism a very suitable system.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Steel, what evidence do u have for WW2 being a war for economic reasons?
    Maybe the German people were all for it because of their own hard ships, but that doesn't explain why we went into the war. If your theory is true then there would never be wars, for the simple reason that a war costs money, a full scale war would cost us trillions of pounds, much more than we would gain from winning.
    WW2 was fought for several reasons, firstly was defence. If we didnt go to war Britain would have been crushed along with the other countries of Europe, leaving Russia, then eventually the USA to fight alone. Even the USa would not have been able to withstand an assault by a victorious German army, who's troops had much needed battle experience.
    The second reason we went to war was to halt Hitler's expansion into our and our allies territories, territory we needed to supply our nation with food and raw materials.
    Thirdly, we went to war because the people supported it, they saw that the Nazi regime was wrong and wanted to destroy it, in order to stop from being exposed to it.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Whowhere, you are so wrong about world war two. Before the second world war Britain considered Hitler a friend, just as it has supported every dictator it thought it could do business with. They did not fall out with Germany until Germany invaded Poland. Germany did this because it wanted to build an empire in eastern europe because it was a growing economic power which wanted to expand into eastern europe.

    Britain had slaughtered millions around the world by empire building and Hitler wanted to be left alone to do the same in eastern europe.

    This threatened Britains position as a world power so it declared war on Germany. The British government told everyone that it was a war against fascism, but it had done nothing when Spain fell to fascism and since world war two has supported brutal regimes around the world from Pinochets regime in Chile to Saddam Husseins' Iraq before the gulf war and president suharto of Indonesia who invaded east timor in 1975 killing a quarter of the population in the civil war following the invasion. The reall reason was to defend the interests of the British ruling class and to defend the British empire. That was why troops were sent out to the far east during world war two to defend Britains colonies in east asia.

    During world war two Britain killed millions by the mass bombing of German cities like Dresden and Hamburg. But refused calls to bomb the railway lines leading to Auschwitz, and refused to allow all but a handful of jewish refugees into Britain. The holocaust only started after the war started. Before that Jews had been persecuted but no plan of mass extermination drawn up. After the war thousands of German prisoners of war and German civilians starved to death in prisoner of war camps due to food shortages.

    World war two was largely won not by the west but by the soviet union which was just as brutal a regime as Hitlers Germany and occupied eastern europe.

    [This message has been edited by Steelgate (edited 03-09-2001).]
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Sean_K, I am not replacing the politics of nationalism with the politics of classes. Just stating fact, that it is the working class who are the most oppressed under capitalism. If people from the ruling class want to join with the working class in creating a socialist world they will be more than welcome. The aim of socialism is to create a classless society.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Cassius Clay was not made to fight at all. In fact, he made a choice not to do so, and went to jail instead. One of the things I admire the man for. But he made the choice, no one forced him into it.

    Well if it was his choice he wouldn't have been in gaol! The point still stands - fight for us or face the consequences!
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Moonkat:
    In the words of Muhammad Ali when he received his draft papers: “Charlie never called me a ****** ” meaning that he was being sent of to fight against people who had done him no harm on the bidding of the ruling classes.


    I'm sure his life expectancy was greater in jail than it was in Vietnam. It's unbelievable how many people don't give a damn about politics and the morality of war until it's their ass on the line. For an oppressed people he's sure living better than this white man.


    "I'd rather have a gun and not need it than to need a gun and not have it."
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Here's an example of the selfish ruling class of America. This is the price our ruling class paid for signing the Declaration of Independence. Those selfish bastards!

    Have you ever wondered what happened to those men who signed the Declaration of Independence?

    Five signers were captured by the British as traitors, and tortured before they died. Twelve had their homes ransacked and burned. Two lost their sons in the Revolutionary Army, another had two sons captured. Nine of the 56 fought and died from wounds or the hardships of the Revolutionary War.

    What kind of men were they? Twenty-four were lawyers and jurists. Eleven were merchants, nine were farmers and large plantation owners, men of means, well educated. But they signed the Declaration of Independence knowing full well that the penalty would be death if they were captured.

    They signed and they pledged their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor.

    Carter Braxton of Virginia, a wealthy planter and trader, saw his ships swept from the seas by the British navy. He sold his home and properties to pay his debts, and died in rags.

    Thomas McKeam was so hounded by the British that he was forced to move his family almost constantly. He served in the Congress without pay, and his family was kept in hiding. His possessions were taken from him, and poverty was his reward.

    Vandals or soldiers or both, looted the properties of Ellery, Clymer, Hall, Walton, Gwinnett, Heyward, Ruttledge, and Middleton.

    At the Battle of Yorktown, Thomas Nelson Jr., noted that the British General Cornwallis, had taken over the Nelson home for his headquarters. The owner quietly urged General George Washington to open fire, which was done. The home was destroyed, and Nelson died bankrupt.

    Francis Lewis had his home and properties destroyed. The enemy jailed his wife, and she died within a few months.

    John Hart was driven from his wife's bedside as she was dying. Their 13 children fled for their lives. His fields and his grist mill were laid waste. For more than a year he lived in forests and caves, returning home after the war to find his wife dead, his children vanished. A few weeks later he died from exhaustion and a broken heart.

    Norris and Livingston suffered similar fates.



    "I'd rather have a gun and not need it than to need a gun and not have it."

    [This message has been edited by Mr_Perfect (edited 05-09-2001).]
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Steelgate:

    Wars are only fought to protect the interests of the ruling class of each country involved in a war. In wars it is the working class who suffer it is they who are ethnicaly cleansed, they who are massacered on battlefields and they who are killed in bombing raids on cities. The working class of each country have more in common with each other than with their rulers and there fore should refuse to support any wars fought by their rulers.


    During the Blitz the working class should have ingored the ruling class and refused to fight. I'm sure then the Germans would have eventually gone away. <IMG alt="image" SRC="http://www.thesite.org/ubb/biggrin.gif"&gt; You crack me up.


    "I'd rather have a gun and not need it than to need a gun and not have it."



    [This message has been edited by Mr_Perfect (edited 05-09-2001).]
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    You forget that, Germany didn't declare war on Britain. It was the other way round. Germany had no intention to invade Britain before Britain declared war on Germany. Also what difference would it have made to the working class if they had not fought during the blitz. They would have simply swapped one set of rulers for another. 55 million people and many millions of injured would have been saved though. Britains claims to be a free country that is worth fighting for but look at what happened during the miners strike it was brutally smashed by the police. The anti-poll tax demonstration was attacked by the police. After the second world war the new labour government used troops to break workers strikes. Every elected government has acted against the wishes of the people. During wars workers kill workers it is as simple as that. If Britain was a workers state then maybe you would have a point. But it is not.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I'm sure you could find a good airfare rate to Moscow. You should look into it because you certainly don't seem pleased with living in Britain.

    What makes you think the Germans weren't going to invade Britain after the rest of Europe had fallen?

    "I'd rather have a gun and not need it than to need a gun and not have it."
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I have already said in the last posting that it wouldn't have made that much difference to the working class if Germany had invaded Britain or not.

    Also what do you mean fly to Moscow, I have told people time and time again that eastern europe was never communist. More like a trynnical dictatorship than communist and wasn't the point of world war two to save europe from tyranny yet half of europe fell to Soviet Russia, so it kind of defeated the purpose of world war two didn't it. Plus there were 55 million dead and half of europe in ruins, and millions of refugees.



  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I'm sure many in western Europe would disagree with your statement of WW2 being pointless.

    "I'd rather have a gun and not need it than to need a gun and not have it."
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Mr_Perfect, don't mind Steelgate he isn't from the same planet as the rest of us.

    peacechild
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    If the aim of the allies in WW2 was to put an end to tyranny in Europe then it was hardly successful as one dictatorship was replaced by another for half of the continent.

    Anyway – where has anyone said that we shouldn’t have fought the Nazis then? Could you point it out for me please? All I can see is statements that to start a war when your country or people are not oppressed is morally wrong and the only reason to do so is for selfish gain.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Going back to the original subject of this thread - has anybody seen anything in the papers about this? I'm not sure the headline 'violent anarchists plan to stop weapons being sold' would go down too well <IMG alt="image" SRC="http://www.thesite.org/ubb/smile.gif"&gt;
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Steelgate:
    Every elected government has acted against the wishes of the people.

    That's the job of an elected government, fool! If they constantly acted in accordance with the wishes of the people there would be no need to elect them!

    I hope you've read enough history to note that the only pure democracies in this ickle planet's meagre history have been

    (a) small;

    (b) violent;

    (c) short-lived.

    Find me a complete counter-example and I'll be quite impressed with you.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Now that I'm back on this site (I promise no more gay bashing or calling them names, I'll stick to other arguements I promise <IMG alt="image" SRC="http://www.thesite.org/ubb/biggrin.gif"&gt;

    I was going to rip a new a$$hole for steelegate, but the work has all ready been done. I have a better Idea for you Steelegate, move to China or Cuba. I'm sure they would love you <IMG alt="image" SRC="http://www.thesite.org/ubb/biggrin.gif"&gt;
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    BBH, how many more times do people have to be told the truth about China and Cuba. If China loves socialists why did it massacre thousands of them in Tianamen Square in June 1989 for protesting for greater democracy. Socialism means production democratically controled by the people for need not profit.
    That has never happened in any country that has called itself communist.



    [This message has been edited by Steelgate (edited 06-09-2001).]
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    MacKenZie – I do believe the Greek Empire was a pure democracy.

    Show me a true socialist country before you tell someone to “pack up and head for one” and I’ll be impressed.


  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    rah rah, Moonkat! <IMG alt="image" SRC="http://www.thesite.org/ubb/wink.gif"&gt;
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru

    The Greeks were democratic, but not to todays standards (no vote for women, the poor, slaves etc), but still pretty revolutionary considering how long ago that system was in place.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    None the less - it was still a pure democroacy that had some small degree of success.

    Women would only throw the bit of clay in the wrong pot anyway <IMG alt="image" SRC="http://www.thesite.org/ubb/wink.gif"&gt;
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Steelgate, what EXACTLY is the perfect state then? What is Utopia for you? Is it likely to ever happen, or does it involove the entire world population agreeing with you?

    Grown up for god's sake. The world will NEVER be a rosy as you believe it can be, because not every one agrees with you. That fact, on it's own, is enough to ensure that you're ideal world will fail.

    As for the arms race. People will always fight, they will always want better weapons that their enemy and someone will make them. So it has always been, and so it will remain.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    steelegate, I am never going to agree with your ideas or come close to giving in to them. So your only option is through force. So you'll have to have bigger weapons than me. But if you don't than my big weapon will put you fruity granola eating ass in it's place. Dumb ideas, little understanding of the 'real' world. It's a nice daydream, but idealists never win (it only works in idea)
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    BHH and man of Kent, across the world millions of people believe in creating socialism so it will be possible. Tens of thousands of people have demonstrated against the WTO, the IMF and the world bank in places like Seatle, Washington, Prague, Gothenburg and Genoa where a massive 300,000 people turned out.



    [This message has been edited by Steelgate (edited 14-09-2001).]
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Lets do some simple maths then shall we...

    There are approximately 4 BILLION people on this planet, if 500 million agreed with you - they would STILL be outnumbered 7-1.

    So 300,000 went to Genoa, in this country alone we have a population of 56m - so an equivalent of 0.5% of our population demonstrated. Hardly a huge movement then.

    I think BBH summed it up (and it's not often that WE agree), in the world the are countries with HUGE arsenals who would do everything they could to stop you. Including the Islamic Extreemists who attacked the US. You and your unarmed cronies (after weapons are bad) would have to stand up against these people and a petition and placard won't stop an RPG.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Man of Kent, our movement is still huge and growing. Our battle is not against the people who live under capitalism but against the capitalist system itself. What we aim to do is to turn the majority or a least a sizable minority of the population against the capitist elite of the world which is very small. Once socialism gets going only the ruling capitalist elite will try to stop it as it is only in their interests to do so. The vast majority of the worlds population will not stand in its way as they want the things that socialism will provide such as a better standard of living and shorter working hours. The majority of the worlds population are not happy with the world the way it is anyway and so will welcome change.

    Here is a link to a good activist website Schnews.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Steelgate:
    Man of Kent, our movement is still huge and growing. Our battle is not against the people who live under capitalism but against the capitalist system itself. What we aim to do is to turn the majority or a least a sizable minority of the population against the capitist elite of the world which is very small. Once socialism gets going only the ruling capitalist elite will try to stop it as it is only in their interests to do so. The vast majority of the worlds population will not stand in its way as they want the things that socialism will provide such as a better standard of living and shorter working hours. The majority of the worlds population are not happy with the world the way it is anyway and so will welcome change.

    Here is a link to a good activist website Schnews.

    We obviously have differing opinions on what is huge - 300,000 people is pissant compared to the worlds population. You have a SERIOSULY long way to go.

    Have you asked 'the workers' if this is what they want? What kind of democracy are you looking for if you 'smash capitalism' first and THEN find out what people want?

    Take a look at this site dude. How many here have given you the impression that they WANT to live under a socialist state? How many do you think would fight tooth and nail to STOP a socialist state? How do you think you could IMPOSE a socialist state on these people?
Sign In or Register to comment.