If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
Local elections & voting
Former Member
Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
The English local elections are coming up on May 1st. I have received my ballot paper in the post and in my area we can only vote by post.
Is this a pilot scheme or is this the case in every area?
What do you think of postal voting? Will it encourage more people to vote or not?
I have already voted and posted my paper back to them. (I was a little annoyed to see the BNP have a candidate in my area - I never thought I would see the day :mad: )
Is this a pilot scheme or is this the case in every area?
What do you think of postal voting? Will it encourage more people to vote or not?
I have already voted and posted my paper back to them. (I was a little annoyed to see the BNP have a candidate in my area - I never thought I would see the day :mad: )
0
Comments
Facist.
Anyways...I get a postal vote (because I'm away when the elections are. I'm pleased to say the only candidates in my area are lib dems and conservative.
My reasons (although I shouldnt have to explain them in a democratic society)
1. I oppose multi-culturalism and the destruction of the tradiotional british soceity.
2. No other party offers the same opportunities to me personally as the BNP.
3. They are a democratic party who appeal to thousands of british people.
4. They seem to be the only political party that are not scared to tell the truth.
5. All the poncy-wet, pink, liberals will get thier nickers in a twist.
6. I love the publicity that the BNP generates, funny thing is, 90% is from the left complaing!
UP THE BNP, the only party at the moment for true brits!
P.S. I used to be a labour man, but I have been betrayed by them, betrayed by a party scared of its own people. A disgrace.
Why?
What opportunities do the BNP offer you? With the exception of a facist society, of course.
Sure, they tell the truth about their "ethnic cleansing" ideals, that's great, but how on earth will it benefit anyone?
About the BNP... personally I can see where they're coming from, trying to uphold the great 'British' society, culture and traditions, but I do feel they're a little extreme and were they to hold any positions of responsibility they would exercise quite controversial policies re: taxes, benefits, immigration etc and would not be capable of running the simpler things like the NHS and education.
You should be proud to see their name on the paper. It's the sign of a free society that even the lowest form of scum (even those like Heydrich) can put themselves up for election.
Of course, should they become powerful enough to win, they would deny this right to you in the future. Bless them.
@ Semper - fundamentalists, be they religious of racial, only offer conflict. If you are happy for that then go ahead, vote BNP. I would be interested to find out what these people offer you personally which is so magnificent...
#1. I am not a Fascist.
#2. The unborn of Britain are going to be the ones who are going to pay the price of the sheer madness of Great Britain's immigration policy. They will scorn the worthless degenerates of today who have sold away the birthright of future generations in the name of political correctness. Fifty years from now we will be well on the way to the final consumation of the Islamic Republic of Great Britainstan - when London is an impoverished Third World city, a cesspool of rape, religious fanaticism, crime, poverty, voodoo, and AIDs like Johannasberg, South Africa of 2003.
Indeed, it is very shocking indeed that the BNP hold the same values the British people did for generations, that Britain was a white European country. Great Britain however today is a country in decline. It is degenerating with each passing year. The British do not even know who the hell they are anymore, just like the Romans in their last days, just like the Americans on the otherside of the Atlantic. I am actually embarrassed my ancestors came from such a place.
ROFL, truly shocking indeed. As if there is even such a thing as "immigrating" to India which is next to impossible if you are not an Indian.
There is a nation called India today, a much larger nation than Great Britain, and unlike the UK of 2003 that India tenaciously protects its ethnic integrity.
See Yugoslavia.
The BNP is the only party in the UK determined to prevent the UK from becoming another South Africa or another Zimbabwe by the end of this century.
The BNP is not a fascist party. Fascism is a statist ideology, it is not necessarily racist. It is not the BNP who are responsible for the imperialism in Iraq at the moment.
The UK will benefit enormously from not following in the footsteps of South Africa, Haiti, Rhodesia, and the American South. Importing nonwhite foreigners from all over the world and actually encouraging them to accent their differences is nothing short of complete and utter madness. It is just that sort of diversity - ethnic, racial, religious - that is responsible for the majority of bloodbaths in human history. Promoting such an absurd society is a prescription for a police state - as the government turns to the role of conflict management - which is dangerous to liberty and individual rights. Faction is not something that should actually be pursued in a society - a source of weakness.
Britain has always been a mongrel race - I know that was originally used as a term of abuse but I think it's a good description - mongrels are better tempered and less likely to suffer the health defects of purely bred pedigree dogs. Britain has integrated Celts, Romans, Anglo-Saxons, Vikings and many others over the years - would there be as much fuss if immigrants over the last sixty years had not had different skin colours? If not then the whole argument is based on skin colour - all the white races who immigrated to Britain have had different cultures, languages and backgrounds.
Absolutely if they came from Germany and Scandanavia and remained Germans.
It was not until quite recently that Great Britain began to import hundreds of thousands of nonwhite immigrants annually of RADICALLY different racial and cultural backgrounds - a prescription for certain disaster shown by countless examples throughout history. Such diversity has been a source of faction for centuries in the American South and STILL plagues us to this day - a curse the wise should well avoid from OUR first hand experience.
ROFL actually the AIDs and other diseases are exploding in Great Britain due to the importation principally of nonwhite immigrants.
Britain has integrated Celts, Romans, Anglo-Saxons, Vikings and many others over the years[/quote]
To compare the mingling of WESTERN ethnicities, of the same race, in which the differences are primarily CULTURAL to the importation of hundreds of thousands of nonwhite immigrants from radical nonwestern backgrounds is a huge false analogy. The best example of this is the case of America where the negro faultline has endured for centuries, a barrier that has been one of America's most horrible afflictions for genrations.
You mean populations that are entirely IMPOSSIBLE to assimilate (i.e. to lose all distinctiveness) that come from radically different nonwestern backgrounds who are actually ENCOURAGED to accent their differences? Absolutely. That is MADNESS. That is COLONIZATION and a sign of a people that are dissolving. We have had this problem in America for centuries and the race problem has been the NUMBER ONE cause above all others of usurpation of the people's liberty by the central government. White Rhodesians and South Africans today know all to well the foolishness of the "diversity is our strength" canard. So do Southerners in the United States.
You act as if race is simply some cafe au lait thing that can simply be dismissed as irrelevent, even worse, you continue with the old race is skin colour canard. Race is a source of FACTION, of division within a society and more factions in a society the more government has to step in (usually over personal liberties) in order to maintain society. This can also be a one way ticket to despotism as is the case of the Afrikaners and White Rhodesians today, or even annihilation as was the case of the French in Haiti.
All the white races who immigrated to Britain were closely related populations of Western Europeans from similar cultural backgrounds. The differences between them were overwhelmingly cultural and thus it was much easier for society to meld together as a whole. This is not the case with Negroes who will ALWAYS remain a distinct population as well as other nonwhites from similar divergent backgrounds. Even worse the more these populations grow, the more they RETAIN their alien cultures, eventually the emerge the dominant culture in the UK.
That is a prescription for nothing less than national and cultural suicide, of faction, totalitarian government, and a century of internal chaos.
Actually, its not that hard to immigrate to India. And yes, non-british indians do. Ethnic integrity in the UK is unjustified.
The population of Britain is aging, and although increasing at the moment it is predicted to begin to fall by 2032 after which the new immigrants will be supporting our pensions.
Fact is, many BRITISH industries would die if it werent for immigrants from all over the world.
AIDS is also exploding due to certain religious communities, including the catholic church - whats your point?
Anyone who actually believes the BNP speaks the "truth" is beyond salvation.
With regard to British 'identity' and other such nonsense: if anything, multiculturalism enriches a nation. What could be better than celebrate your heritage whilst embracing the best other cultures have to offer? Besides, many citizens of Asian, African or Middle Eastern origin are British. If anything, 'patriotic' BNP supporters should celebrate Asian culture for it is as British as fish and chips, or indeed as a curry.
Ignorant and moronic remarks about the spread of AIDS and so forth are so stupid they should not need explaining. The racist brigade will hold on to them because they want to hate other races and blame them for anything they can. Just for the record, the biggest cause for the spread of AIDS in this country is unprotected heterosexual sex. In many cases, I fear, by patriotic BNP-supporting white British hooligans who shag around without a condom and then brag about it on hoolie websites while blaming 'pakis' and 'wogs' for the decline of this country.
Demonstrate to me evidence that it is "quite easy" to immigrate to Indian.
Yes, I am well aware of the demographic deterioration of the British population, no doubt a symptom of a dying population and instability of the current culture in that country.
British industries ARE going to die unless the demographic decline is reversed and the hedonism of the degernate culture that dominates in Britain today is erradicated. Britain will become more and more of a totalitarian society, a third world country of wealthy old people surrounded by teaming impoverished third world immigrants. That is a prescription if there ever was one for disaster.
It is specifically the importation of large numbers of foreigners that are responsible for the overwhelming majority of the jump in infectious diseases.
:rolleyes:
The EXAMPLES of South Africa, Haiti, Rhodesia, and Indonesia speak VOLUMES about the sheer madness, the insanity of the present immigration policy pursued by the British Government. History speaks for itself in that regard.
That is Britain's primary problem - Nihilism. The British do not know who they are anymore - just like the Romans. Just like the Romans who deployed thousands of troops across the world they are failing to maintain their own sense of identity and their own borders in the FALSE assumption that immigrants will always "assimilate" and "enrich" their society.
Yes, multiculturalism sure enriched Yugoslavia which disintegrated into genocide. Multicutluralism enriched India as well which broke apart. Where is the Soviet Union today? Multiculturalism just a few years ago almost broke apart Canada. We see multiculturalism everyday in the gang warfare we have in Los Angeles or even in the streets of YOUR capital London. We see the strength of Multiculturalism in the massive riots in Antwerp all the time now. No one IMO can speak with experience about precisely this sort of problem than the American South which has been CURSED by racial conflict for centuries now. South Africa is another great rainbow nation - the AIDs, murder, and rape capital of the world which becomes more of an impoverished hellhole every single year. Surely the white Rhodesians who are being exterminated by the maniac Mugabe can say multiculturalism has been a strength for that country.
Being rid FOREVER of such a curse, such a source of eternal FACTION. Being free of such race riots and possibly even racial war as is the case of Rhodesia. What happens when jobs become scarce, when economies falter in such societies? The factions increasingly come to blame each other, chaos in society, ethnic strife.
Yes, and instead of having quarreling Welsh, quarreling Scots and English, quarrelling religious factions in Ireland which is enough diveristy for ANYONE you simply MAGNIFY all those problems and sources of division exponentially by importing groups who come from even more radically different backgrounds. You ACTUALLY encourage these people to remain distinct - to assert that identity. The result is the gang warfare we saw not to long ago on the streets of London. The result is another Johannasburg in the making - an impoverished hellhole of quarreling factions.
Why is this sort of thing promoted? For many reasons, among them, the capitalist desire for CHEAP labour, the liberal hatred of Britain's Western European identity, the central government who tramples over more and more individual liberties in order to hold the factions together, the tolerance industry which enriches itself upon the disintegration of British society. . .the end result being chaos, poverty, ethnic conflict, and totalitarianism.
ROFL - give the birthright of future generations away for CURRY! Set yourself up for a century of internal ethnic chaos, quarreling and resentment as one group benefits more than another, one huge Northern Ireland or another Bosnia for CURRY!
It is a FACT that the importation of so many foreigners is causing AIDs to explode in Britain, that unlike the ideal mixed race perposterous argument above, just the opposite is true. The health of society deteriorates.
Racial seperatism has NOTHING whatsoever to do with hatred of other races. It has everything to do with EXPERIENCE. It is the experience of countless nations who have dealt with this experiment before that warrants caution. A healthy government DISCOURAGES sources of DIVISION within a society for faction is a curse of nations. Throwing groups from radically different racial and cultural backgrounds together in the same society, making them compete for scarcer and scarcer resources, and telling them to accent the sources of division between them is nothing short of madness. It is a nation's deathwish. Just look at South Africa today.
Britain's racial diversity is 100% responsible for the race riots it is just not getting accustomed to.
Anonymous Authority.
The EXPERIENCE of South Africa and Rhodesia, the bizarre ridiculous rainbow nations that are notorious failures, is exactly why the BNP is the ONLY party to vote for in Britain. Faction is a curse of nations. The majority of bloodbaths we have seen in this world have been over racial, ethnic, and religious differences. To actually PURSUE such a policy, with the intention of actually promoting such divisions within a polity, is quite frankly INSANE.
As for the USA, well the whole 'ethos' of that countrry is based on the notion of a melting pot. Nearly everyone is descended from an immigrant in some context in that nation.
How can you be so blinkered and so convinced that you're right when you're being so discriminatory and closed-minded? There's a point in civilised politics beyond which you do not go, and I think you are doing so. Plain racism is inexcusable.
Anyone else slightly shocked?
Yes this is true. Why are you equating a person and a citizen to be the same thing?
In all of African history before the European arrival in that area there was no country EVER known as a "South Africa." Such an entity DID NOT exist.
Absolutely not. What should have happened, the logical solution, would have been a partition of the country into a seperate white nation and a seperate black nation. The same is true in Rhodesia.
This is 100% absolutely false. The whole "ethos" of America was built upon the fact accepted for centuries that America was to be a WHITE nation composed of sovereign and independent states. The naturalization act of 1790 - the law - was quite clear about this, establishing citizenship ONLY for "free white persons." This remained the case all the way up until the 1950s. The idea of an "American Melting Pot" did not come about until the 20th Century and even then it was in reference to the TOTAL assimilation of EUROPEAN immigrants. Theodore Roosevelt who signed the Gentlemen's Agreement with Japan to keep prohibit Asiatic immigration would have been APPALED at the ludicrous immigration policy we have today, which is not even a "Melting Pot" but a "Tossed Salad" of factions of alien nationalities.
Every nation in the WORLD starts out as a nation of immigrants. Such nations then mature into high cultures and become a "nation of natives" who exclude foreigners. You also overrepresent the effect immigration has had on the United States. The vast majority of white Americans are descended from the original colonists and natural increase of already established populations. Now here is a treat for you.
President Theodore Roosevelt on Multiculturalism
Yes, surely it is indeed SHOCKING that I hold the same opinions that Americans and Southerners have held throughout the vast majority of their own history.
There is nothing whatsoever wrong with discrimination as a moral principle. A nation that does not discriminate against those who are not members of its population is not a nation at all - for a nation defines itself in opposition to what it is not. What you support is an ABSENCE of discrimination, an ABSENCE of value. It is not immoral or moral - it is amoroal. It is NIHILISM.
Discrimination and Racism are two DIFFERENT things entirely. What you despise is the concept of value itself. You despise the ability of individuals, on a superpersonal scale nations, to use their own minds, to hold values, and discriminate between values and nonvalues. The ability of individuals to value is essential to life itself - the ability to choose between alternative choices and actions.
What is truly shocking is how nihilism is promoted as MORAL principle.
Not my point. Blacks inhabited what is now South Africa long before whites.
Why not? By your reasoning, what is now South Africa was a black country. For that to be maintained, whites should have been repatriated.
That's false. Only 15% of US citizens can trace their ancestry back to the original English settlers (or at the least people who fought against the British during the War of Independene). You fail to take into account Irish and German Americans (as well as Italians and Eastern Europeans). If anything, the majority of white Americans are either of Irish or German descent.
I understand that it's important for a country's people to feel unity and to look after themselves first and foremost - if we gave everyone who wanted to enter and live in our country just as much rights as people whose roots have been here for ages, the country's economy and society wouldn't survive. BUT I still believe we should welcome others with open arms, adapt to demographic changes and learn to accept that things won't always be the same, nations won't always be solely 'white' and cultural diversity is what helps us learn about others.
You have to compromise.
Here's a thought: deport all racists, strip them of their British citizenship and drop them in a desert island. There they can carry on their way of life uncontaminated from lesser races. Perhaps they can call their island New Britannia or something like that, and live in racial purity for ever after. And the rest of us can get on with our lives free of such vermin.