If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
Y vigilance stops terrorist in UK
Former Member
Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
You can read the full article on Yahoo. And there is an Iraqi connection. I put up part of this article for discussion.
6 Arrested in U.K. Over Poison Discovery
LONDON - Anti terrorist police said Tuesday they arrested six men of North African origin after finding traces of the poison ricin in London.
The six men were being questioned after an operation by Scotland Yard's anti-terrorist branch in north and east London.
Police said "equipment and materials" were found at an address in Wood Green where one of the men was detained. A woman who was also arrested had been released, police said in a statement.
Ricin — one of the world's deadliest toxins, twice as deadly as cobra venom — is derived from the seeds and pods of the castor bean plant and may be inhaled, ingested or injected. There is no known antidote.
6 Arrested in U.K. Over Poison Discovery
LONDON - Anti terrorist police said Tuesday they arrested six men of North African origin after finding traces of the poison ricin in London.
The six men were being questioned after an operation by Scotland Yard's anti-terrorist branch in north and east London.
Police said "equipment and materials" were found at an address in Wood Green where one of the men was detained. A woman who was also arrested had been released, police said in a statement.
Ricin — one of the world's deadliest toxins, twice as deadly as cobra venom — is derived from the seeds and pods of the castor bean plant and may be inhaled, ingested or injected. There is no known antidote.
0
Comments
Know what's wierd? This story just made the NY papers.
Wasnt that the stuff that was used to kill the bulgarian bloke with the umbrella?
Do a search on ricin and you will see that that it is an extremely easy toxin to procure. Every government in the world, every university, anyone with basic chemistry knowledge can produce the toxin. Every criminal, from assassins to gangsters can buy it for a modest amount of money. Hell, anyone who know their plants can go to the forest and pick up some beans.
It is as ludicrous as saying Saddam killed JFK because he was shot with a rifle and Saddam has been photograph holding a rifle.
LONDON, Jan. 7 — Anti-terrorist police said Tuesday they arrested six men of North African origin after finding traces of ricin, a deadly poison that in the past has been linked to al-Qaida and Iraq, in a London property.
It is entirely possible that this attack would be on France and not the UK...
Why does everyone always assume every potential terrorist threat comes from this one organisation? There are hundreds if not thousands of terrorist groups in the world, not least the IRA. Whilst everyone is on the look out for mad gun weilding muslims, other terrorist groups are more likely to be planning something terrible.
I reckon in the current climate anyone could claim to have caused a terrorist attack and the govts of the US and UK would say 'no, it wasn't you, it was Al Qaeda.'
LONDON, England -- It was one of the most notorious acts of assassination carried out during the Cold War.
Bulgarian dissident Georgi Markov was killed by poison dart filled with ricin and fired from an umbrella in London in 1978.
Britian
Ricin (pronounced RICE-in) is derived from the castor bean plant, which is grown around the world, and is relatively easy to produce. It has been linked in the past to Osama bin Laden (news - web sites)'s al-Qaida terror network and Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)'s regime in Iraq.
In Washington, U.S. officials said Tuesday that no al-Qaida links had yet been established to the London arrests, but that it was a matter being investigated.
You're right, they don't know yet. Another news story said it was one of the chemicals found the first time in Iraq. I can see why basically the politicians in the US are saying do we want to take a chance that Saddam won't share capabilities? I say no. Why should we?
Interesting that they missed out that the only recorded use of ricin was by the Bulgarians in that assassination...
I'd say there was a link there too
Which proves my point that Bush, Blair and their cronies are getting increasingly desperate at the lack of progress with the projected war, and will throw all kind of wild accusations and scare stories in a pathetic attempt to gear up the public and other nations for war.
Remember, it is not Iraq who has consistently shared technology and materials for the construction of WMDs... but the good old US of A and to a lesser extent, Britain.
So when do we start bombing Washington to ensure they never again share WMD technology with madmen and dictators?
I'm waiting. *taps foot*
Here you are. This is my answer on a previous thread (the Bremner, Bird and Fortune one) that you obviously forgot to reply to.
"No one here is defending Saddam. What is being questioned is the REAL reasons behind Bush's push towards war. If you want to make some thinking of your own you might (or might not) reach several conclusions:
- Iraq and the so-called war on terror have absolutely NOTHING to do with each other. There is no evidence whatsoever that Iraq has or will provide weapons to Al Queida. As it has been pointed out already bin Laden and Al Queida despise Saddam Hussein for running Iraq as a secular state, as opposed to their version of a Islamic state they would like it to be. If nothing else I had thought you and every other American would have been disgusted by Bush's shameful hijacking of the 9/11 anniversary when he claimed Iraq and Al Queida are linked. Talk about insulting the memory of the 3,000 victims by pushing his agenda and lies on the very anniversary of the attacks.
- The very muslim 'perverts' you so despise so have been operating labs in Northern Iraq in league with Al Queida. If anything Saddam is preventing the expansion of such people in the parts of Iraq he controls.
- There is no evidence or reason in the world why Saddam Hussein would want to launch an attack on any Western country. Not one. For starters the only thing he would achieve was guaranteeing the destruction of Iraq and himself. He has absolutely no interests or reason to attack anyone. He invaded Kuwait because of oil interests, and it is clear to everyone including Saddam himself that the same thing won't be allowed to happen in the future.
- As weeks pass by it is becoming more and more apparent that if anybody is telling porkies about Iraq's WMD programme is the US and the UK, not Iraq. Hussein has so far complied with every last demand we have thrown at him and the UN inspectors have not found a trace of a renewed weapons programme. The US continues to claim it has proof of otherwise but cannot reveal it because it would "compromise its sources". I mean, give me a fucking break!
- Not forgetting that much of the anthrax and chemicals we hear so often about were SUPPLIED by the US and the UK. I guess it's okay to dump the stuff on Kurds and Iranian soldiers, but not on white Westerners.
- With regard to the compliance of UN resolutions, danger to world peace and possession of illegal WMDs, the double standards and sheer hypocrisy of the US are astonishing. There is one little country also in the Middle East that is guilty of all of the above and has been allowed to carry on unchecked for 3 decades. If the US want to become the world's policeman it should start there, then resolve the situation in North Korea and in the Indian-Pakistani conflict, another two issues many times more dangerous to world peace than Iraq, and then move to address the Iraqi issue. It might also want to disarm itself a little; as the world's biggest amasser of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons and the country that has invaded more nations than anybody else in the last 5 decades, the USA can be safely regarded as the biggest threat to world peace there is.
Tell me again why we should invade Iraq?"
I eagerly await your response
In the past.
Most things like this can be linked to most terrorist networks. I am with MoK on this one. The possibility of a link with an attack on France is plausable.
Which isn't what a toxicologist will tell you. Apparently you could leave some on a turnstile in the underground for people to touch. It only takes milligrammes to kill, therefore anyone touching it, and then (for example) eating, is likely to ingest enough...
Added to that is it's airborne capability...
Possibly in the same way that any other scientist doesn't die from the substances they handle...
I wouldn't be afraid not to trust the government (In reply to pnjsurferpoet)
To me, this does seem like an Algerian link as was the threats to Scotland and London around New Years. I know a little about the hatred of some Algerians towards the French...but what do they have against the British?