If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
should he have been jailed?
BillieTheBot
Posts: 8,721 Bot
id be interested to hear the views of people on thesite.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7785629.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7785629.stm
Beep boop. I'm a bot.
0
Comments
It was an accident, and he was acting in defence of his daughter.
The justice system fucks up so badly, i feel like i lose my faith in it more and more every day
I don't think he should be denied the right to teach, however.
I think a suspended sentence would have been more in order. Any loving father would probably have reacted in a similar manner. It's not like he was a 3rd party getting involved.
Yeah, that sounds better to be honest.
No you won't - you're allowed to use reasonable force
wouldn't it be the Jury who found him guilty? if so the Judge has limited options on offer given that he was found guilty.
Does it apply here though?
Seems to me that she locked herself into a room, phoned him, he came from another house, brought a weapon and hit him on the head. I thought the use of reasonable force was in a situation where your life is in danger, like someone waking you up while robbing your house and them going to attack you. There was obviously some sort of plan involved here so doesn't sound like self-defence to me. Personally I would act in the same manner and it does sound harsh considering the circumstance but it's still manslaughter and that's the way the law is here.
id do the time knowing id done the right thing
but it wasnt so much self defence as it was going in with a weapon, with possible intent to do "some" harm however lightly.
(devils advocate above)
Though there are people more deserving of prison time
He didnt go in with a weapon. He wrenched the weapon out of his son in laws hand (that his son in law was about to use on his daughter and grandchildren) and hit him with it
Any normal person would of done the same! I would of done a lot worse
Set the man free, he will have enough punishment, knowing what he has done.
I'm no law expert, but i'd say wounding with intent or ABH would have been more appropriate, with a suspended sentence.
Obviously with the media, we get fairly limited information compared to those directly involved in the incident, so it can be hard to judge exactly.
Would I do the same? Damn right I would.
"I thought the use of reasonable force was in a situation where your life is in danger, like someone waking you up while robbing your house and them going to attack you. "
The farmer who shot the intruder got jailed - again, I'd say reasonable force!
It's a shame when you a)have to protect what is legally yours / what you care about and b) are punished for doing so
If i said that 'the farmer that shot the intruder who was in his house illegally and killed him is the same as the man who killed his daughters husband', then sure, i'd agree.
A comment was made about using reasonable force.
To me, either of these separate incidents *which i do not think are the same* are both uses of reasonable force.