If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
Tonay Blair and Bush should be Hanged
Former Member
Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
Hi,
what you think about that tony blair and bush (FUCK him) should be hanged as Sadam hussain for killing millions of people, and destroy countries. They lie with the whole world about the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
They should be hanged such a way no one after that think of doing this. I hope the investigation which has started against Tony end with the verdict that who should be hanged.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=l3vsI9j7bSA
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Od_jdg7n6-s&feature=related
what you think about that tony blair and bush (FUCK him) should be hanged as Sadam hussain for killing millions of people, and destroy countries. They lie with the whole world about the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
They should be hanged such a way no one after that think of doing this. I hope the investigation which has started against Tony end with the verdict that who should be hanged.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=l3vsI9j7bSA
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Od_jdg7n6-s&feature=related
0
Comments
But yeah, they do need to be thrown in a dark dungeon.
What's your argument against Afghanistan? As far as I can see, the only problem with invading Afghanistan was the fact that they didn't finish the job and fucked off to Iraq half way through.
Same happen in Afghanistan, it was said that 9/11 accident was done by someone sitting in Afghanistan, but US still have not have any prove for this, so its all illegal war, don't you think?
I suppose you blame the insidious Jews?
Of course someone 'sitting' in Afghanistan couldn't have carried it out .. they are half a world away. But there is no reason not to think that a person cannot PLAN such an attack from that distance. There is a difference.
Are you kidding? Afghanistan was a training ground for terrorism. Following the 9/11 attacks, the flat out refused to enter a dialogue with America on the issue, denying that Bin Laden had anything to do with it (Bin Laden has since gone on record as taking credit for the attacks). The Taliban were then officially renounced as the legal government of Afghanistan not only by the west, but by the UAE and Saudi Arabia. In fact only your country still recognised them as a government. The UN International Security Assistance Force was sent in shortly after the initial assault to help stabilise the country. There was nothing illegal about it.
actually it's worth billions in opium production, reconstruction projects, and as dick cheney observed in 1998, it's the best pipeline route to bring shitloads of caspian oil and gas through, only the pesky taliban wouldn't let them build the pipeline, so we stopped supplying them with weapons and blamed them for 9/11, invaded, put a more cooperative gov in place and hey presto we get our pipeline......afghanistan is a fairly strategic geopolitical base in the middle east, esp for any future incursions into the area like say, oh iraq?
as to the OP, well if we hung all the bent war hungry politicians there wouldn't be many left!
actually when we were arming and training them to fight the soviets we called them 'freedom fighters', but that's just semantics eh.....you could also say any number of UAE countries are training grounds for terrorism, but we didn't go invade saudi arabia just because 19 of the 9/11 bombers were saudi did we? never let facts get in the way of a good story...
Yes a person can plan that even sitting at moon but what the prove US govt. that it was done by Bin Ladin.
And about terrorism i agree with Senor Miguel 100% these were the people who were the most closest one, there was hot line between CIA and Ladin, they give them latest weapons to fight against USSR, at that time "Jihad" was right but when they turn their guns it become terrorism.
This country has allot of energy reserves even China is trying to get some influence in this part of world plus it can also be a very good route for the pipeline from previous USSR.
Because Bin Laden admitted it? :rolleyes:
Afghanistan and Iraq are important strategically so we invade. Zimbabwe isn't so we sit back and do nothing.
But he did admit to the attacks on the US Embassies in East Africa and the bombing of the USS Cole... Sounds like an act of war if you ask me...
9/11 was coincidential. It was the final straw but if you ask me they had enough pretext to go to war beforehand but 9/11 gave them the popular support (if you believe that...)
I personally, having watched a few things about this think 9/11 was engineered by the US Gov't but there can be no doubt that the acts prior to that were perpetrated by Bin Laden and his mates were enough to warrant a war.
It couldn't be because the House of Saud buy lots of lovely weapons from us, could it?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7455267.stm
http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2004/10/29/binladen_message041029.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6363306/
"In the videotaped message, bin Laden claims full responsibility for the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks in the United States and warns Americans that “your security is not in the hands of Kerry or Bush or al-Qaida. Your security is in your own hands"
More likely because the House of Saud enjoys swinging Al-Q members from gallows, whilst the Taliban didn't.
IMO they were both illegal wars. The UN should have stepped in and said no, the whole reason it was created was to avoid wars like that.
Al Qaeda was sponsored / protected by the Taleban...