If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
Is this actually any better than tagging/graffiti?
BillieTheBot
Posts: 8,721 Bot
Apologies for the source...
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2005300000-2007410233,00.html
Fucking awful, that is. :mad:
Nearly as bad as our willingness to sell just about anything for a quick buck.
At least graffiters don't have commercial interests at heart.
Pathetic.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2005300000-2007410233,00.html
Fucking awful, that is. :mad:
Nearly as bad as our willingness to sell just about anything for a quick buck.
At least graffiters don't have commercial interests at heart.
Pathetic.
Beep boop. I'm a bot.
0
Comments
And presumably if I don't like a St. Paul's Cathedral with giant Nike adverts plastered over its dome and McDonalds posters covering its walls I just need to look the other way and not visit it?
What a profoundly sad and depressing world we live in when the only consideration ever is to make money, and the hell with anything else regardless of its beauty/importance/heritage/etc.
What odious, repellent, soul-destroying, fucking ugly system capitalism really is.
I wouldn't want to see St Pauls with an advert on it, but Times Square would look a lot worse without them.
Ok if I saw it live there may be more obvious signs, but currently it looks rather nice and quite a clever design.
Would it then still be a blot on the landscape.
Also, the idea of 'waving a magic wand' and just selecting all these trinkets, seems a little worrying