Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options

What is important to you?

Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
With the slow ratcheting up of policies over the next couple of years as both Cameron and Brown jockey for position in you hearts I have to ask, what are the five main issues (in order of priority) which will determine who you vote for?

My answer:

1. Health (natch ;) )
2. Defence
3. Education
4. Crime & Punishment
5. Welfare State


Now I'm not saying which way I would vote on each area, but these are the important ones for me...
«1

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    1) Foreign Policy
    2) The environment/Climate Change/Rescource depletion
    3) Poverty/Social inequality
    4) Education
    5) The Economy

    Although I don't see any particular value in limiting the issues to five, or placing them in order. Others:

    6) Health/NHS
    7) Transport (combined with environment now really)
    8) Civil Liberties/Surveillence state
    9) Electoral reform
    10) Pensions Crisis
    11) Trident/Defence spending
    12) Europe
    13) Crime/prisons
    14) Social Security
    15) Tax
    16) Technological progress

    etc, etc

    All these need to be tackled seriously, ASAP. I think this country (and the western world in general) is facing a serious crisis in the next 20 years considering the number and scale of the problems being faced...
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    what are the five main issues (in order of priority) which will determine who you vote for?

    1) They have CONSERVATIVE typed next to their name on the ballot paper
    2) Ditto
    3) Ditto
    4) Ditto
    5) Ditto

    ;)

    1) Foreign Policy and Defence Policy
    2) Northern Ireland (and the Union more generally)
    3) Civil rights
    4) Environment
    5) Taxation
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    In no particular order

    Liberty
    Fraternity
    Equality

    and for good measure Empathy
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    1) Transport
    2) Crime
    3) Taxes
    4) Trident/ Nuclear Weapons
    5) Health


    :thumb:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Ok, the ones that come into my mind:

    *environment / social conscience etc.
    *aid / proactive foreign policy, but not to the extent of Iraq!
    *education, education, edu-bloody-cation
    *welfare, in particular an emphasis on affordable housing (hey, I'm a student, it's an issue that will effect me in the next 4 years!)
    *economic policy, in particular please don't impoverish the country, but please do move towards economic integration with europe, as in the long run it will be good, even though we're going to be a net contributor for some time

    As for health, whilst that's important, personally I think good healthcare is worth paying for, and the NHS is 'good enough' for most things. But I'm fairly healthy, so it's not likely to affect me...

    p.s. they weren't particularly ordered, just things that came to mind
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    1. Transport
    2. Council Tax
    3. Education
    4. Anti Social Behaviour
    5. Health
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    1. me
    2. me
    3. me
    4. me
    5. me
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Jim V wrote: »
    In no particular order

    Liberty
    Fraternity
    Equality

    and for good measure Empathy

    Gotta love the French Rev!

    I'm in an optimistic mood today so will agree
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    As always, I've only seen policies that will determine who I won't vote for, so I won't be voting.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    As always, I've only seen policies that will determine who I won't vote for, so I won't be voting.



    just use that, and vote for someone other than the people you like the least, then you can moan if they get into power :)
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    1. Education
    2. Welfare state
    3. Crime and Punishment
    4. Health
    5. Defence
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    1)Crime
    2)Defence
    3)Education
    4)Healthcare
    5)Transport costs
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    1) How they propose to deal with crime
    2) Social welfare
    3) Health
    4) Civil Liberties
    5) Tax
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    1) Civil Liberties

    by some distance

    2) Immigration

    which is basically part of civil liberties

    3) The Economy

    4) Education

    5) foreign Policy
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    *is ashamed*

    Can't believe that I didn't think of civil liberties as a separate issue from defence and crime...
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    *is ashamed*

    Can't believe that I didn't think of civil liberties as a separate issue from defence and crime...

    Why did you put defence at number two? Granted its something we should have, but number two?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Because without it very little else matters.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Because without it very little else matters.

    Granted, but I dont see that unless we have massive cuts in our military spending that we are under threat from direct attack. Maybe you see it differently.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Jim V wrote: »
    In no particular order

    Liberty
    Fraternity
    Equality

    and for good measure Empathy

    You need to be living next door mon frére
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    budda wrote: »
    Granted, but I dont see that unless we have massive cuts in our military spending that we are under threat from direct attack. Maybe you see it differently.

    They said that in 1932 - defence spending has to be on a very long run basis. Its useless to find you need a tank which doesn't break down every few miles, has the armour to protect it and the weapons to knock out the enemy and find out there is a 15-20 year development cycle.

    But its also about making sure that our current armed forces have decent medical care, housing, access to training and that there are enough soldiers that there is a decent amount of time between tours (which there isn't at the moment). Its the old fashioned view of the covenant between the state and those that risk there lives on its behalf...
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    for me:

    education (for everyone as a whole, adults and children)
    looking after those who need help
    friends and family
    having fun
    my basic freedoms
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    They said that in 1932 - defence spending has to be on a very long run basis. Its useless to find you need a tank which doesn't break down every few miles, has the armour to protect it and the weapons to knock out the enemy and find out there is a 15-20 year development cycle.

    But its also about making sure that our current armed forces have decent medical care, housing, access to training and that there are enough soldiers that there is a decent amount of time between tours (which there isn't at the moment). Its the old fashioned view of the covenant between the state and those that risk there lives on its behalf...



    i'd rather the money from trident be spent on well equipping the people who are brave/stupid enough to act on the governments whim and making sure they get the best medical care and free decent lodgings and food
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    The economy.
    Defence.
    Law and order.
    Education.
    Foreign policy/Europe.

    I do not suspect there will be many big differences between Brown and Cameron on most of the above.

    Cameron might have to make some vague promise of tax cuts to appease the Conservative grassroots. And the Conservatives are more likely to reverse cutbacks to the armed forces, Labour don't like our armed forces and even overstretched and deployed around the world cutbacks continue. On law and order, education, foreign policy I don't think there is much between Brown and Cameron.

    On foreign policy both will be broadly atlanticist, although perhaps slightly less so than Blair. Although, I think it will depend mostly on who is in the White House. On Europe, I do not think either would risk the wrath of The Sun and endorse any change to the status quo. (Unfortunately I cannot see Brown or Cameron enthusiastically promoting the Euro or a European Constitution).

    Can't see much changing on education. Although, maybe Cameron will have more ideas - Brown seems to think just throwing money at problems is the solution. He's been doing it since 1997 and it hasn't worked. The government has spent millions putting 'interactive whiteboards' in almost every classroom. Whilst increased funding was (and in many cases, still is) needed it's not the sole answer to reversing Britain's decline in the classroom.

    Meh, in spite of all the issues I could never vote for Brown. The LibDems are muddled. And whilst Cameron is a twat I'll vote Conservative as the alternatives are worse. The Conservatives will do better on the economy, defence and law/order and I cannot see how they could do any worse on education.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    They said that in 1932 - defence spending has to be on a very long run basis. Its useless to find you need a tank which doesn't break down every few miles, has the armour to protect it and the weapons to knock out the enemy and find out there is a 15-20 year development cycle.

    But its also about making sure that our current armed forces have decent medical care, housing, access to training and that there are enough soldiers that there is a decent amount of time between tours (which there isn't at the moment). Its the old fashioned view of the covenant between the state and those that risk there lives on its behalf...

    :yes:

    It is never a good idea to cut back on defence spending. That is a short-term gain with a long-term price tag.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I do not suspect there will be many big differences between Brown and Cameron on most of the above.
    That's the main problem for me. For me, these are the main issues:

    1. Defence/security/foreign policy (and the removal of civil liberties disguising itself as such)
    2. Education (with specific interest in what each party intends to do about the worse performing students and students with special needs/learning difficulties, since I think in the long term, good performance in this area would result in future crime levels improving)
    3. Transport
    4. Welfare/benefits/getting people back into work
    5. Health

    I wouldn't say these are the most important issues to me in general, just at the moment, as I feel these are the areas where the current government is making the biggest cock ups.

    In general, I would say the following issues are most important to me, and would determine what country I lived in if I could pick any country:

    1. Employment opportunities
    2. Civil liberties
    3. Healthcare
    4. Education
    5. Crime

    Call me old fashioned, but I personally think that I'm more likely to come to harm as a result of being mugged on a street corner, than by a terrorist or foreign government. And tbh, I can't say I see any corrolation between defence spending and how likely a country is to be attacked. In fact from what I can tell, the countries that spend the least often seem to be at the bottom of potential targets. So defence isn't even in my reckoning, though foreign policy is and would probably be number 6.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Education
    Health
    Transport
    Environment
    Pensions crisis and care of old people (can I lump that into one?)

    Really I want house prices to come down so I can afford to buy one, cookery to be taught in schools, no ID cards and to afford to have children in a few years. If there was someone to vote for who could sort that out for me then I'd tick their box! Heh.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Things like civil liberties and an open mind on issues like drugs are important to me.
    Health
    Transport
    Support/education/future for the poorer areas where knife/gun crime is high.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    They said that in 1932 - defence spending has to be on a very long run basis. Its useless to find you need a tank which doesn't break down every few miles, has the armour to protect it and the weapons to knock out the enemy and find out there is a 15-20 year development cycle.

    But its also about making sure that our current armed forces have decent medical care, housing, access to training and that there are enough soldiers that there is a decent amount of time between tours (which there isn't at the moment). Its the old fashioned view of the covenant between the state and those that risk there lives on its behalf...

    Of course, and I totally agree. But I guess I just dont see it as a very high priority when I am voting because all the parties are roughly similar in terms of spending on defence. I know the Tories have promised to spend more, but they are not talking of massive increases are they.

    Obviously if a party suggested that the funding should be drastically cut then I wouldnt vote for them, but no party is suggesting that are they.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    budda wrote: »
    Of course, and I totally agree. But I guess I just dont see it as a very high priority when I am voting because all the parties are roughly similar in terms of spending on defence. I know the Tories have promised to spend more, but they are not talking of massive increases are they.

    Obviously if a party suggested that the funding should be drastically cut then I wouldnt vote for them, but no party is suggesting that are they.

    True - but I think its more than spending. Its about have a Defence Secretary who appreciates the army is not a civilian job and its values are not the same as that of wider society. Whilst I think the Tories are no-where near as good as they were, they still have more MPs who are ex-forces, TA or reservist and are more likely not to see the army as just a job.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    1. Civil liberties
    2. Foreign policy
    3. Economy
    4. Education
    5. Law and order

    You might think that no.5 conflicts with no.1, but the fact is if we pissed less foreigners off, had a healthy economy which rewarded labour fairly and spread wealth more evenly, and educated people to have some morals and respect, then maybe you wouldn't have such segregated/isolated sections of society at odds with each other, you wouldn't need so many cameras/laws/police to keep everyone in order, and consequently you wouldn't need such a big government to enforce it all.....ahh silly me.
Sign In or Register to comment.