If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options
Pitched street fighting in Iran.
Former Member
Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/07/09/iran.protests.reut/index.html
Brave, pro-democracy students are taking nutty radical Muslims in the streets of Tehran. I hope the CIA starts supplying these students with the arms they need to get the 100 perverted clerics out of power so millions can live as free Muslims with rights and joy in their lives.
Brave, pro-democracy students are taking nutty radical Muslims in the streets of Tehran. I hope the CIA starts supplying these students with the arms they need to get the 100 perverted clerics out of power so millions can live as free Muslims with rights and joy in their lives.
0
Comments
Sensing a pattern?
And it's nice how the CNN is brainwashing you, in the UK or any other country with a reasonably free press the headline would be "Pitched fighting between democrats and radicals". or something similar.
How about you turn it on it's head? Insane pro-democratic layabouts beaten back by the glorious forces of Allah?
that would be even more biased with that headline. This just said a pitched street fight was going on without laying blame on either side. I'm for the pro democracy students though. Bet the BBC isn't even covering it.
because of course, american tv is so truthful.
BBC: A British plane was shot down by friendly fire today
NBC: A British plane was shot down in action today
and i think you'll find Whowhere's alternatation was in reference to your "Brave, pro-democracy students are taking nutty radical Muslims in the streets of Tehran"
you are an idiot. and i do not like your beliefs. although i find these points exclusive to each other.
US corporate owned media is too busy colluding with the Washington spin doctors to give you such thorough and complete information.
Let them adhere to the rule of law rather than placing themselves above it before meddling in any other country's problems.
No, I'm always for democracy. The only difference between my dad and I is that I feel that his generation's liberalism..."it's all good" world culture values...allowed the murderers of 9/11 to enter America and use our laws to train, raise funds and plans the NY mass murder. So my feeling is: it's not all good.
The President of Pakistan has helped catch Al Qaeda operatives who could have murdered Americans. My friend's dad, who is a Pakistani Muslim, says you have to live in Pakistan to understand his hatred of extremist and terrorists. He's the one who came up with "Muslim perverts, people who are perverting the religion into a death cult." And I agree with him
I see that yet again you have no problem with Pakistan so long as Bush controls its President. Perhaps you would like to tell me then what you think of George Bush's newest friend President Karimov of Uzbekistan, a brutal dictator that boils people alive and forces 5 year old kids to work the cotton fields.
(Warning- Graphic images)
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3943.htm
So, any thoughts on this? Are you or are you not prepared to stand up for the rights of the people of Uzbekistan and denounce your President as a cynical two-faced crook who is happy to form alliances with monsters every bit as bad as Saddam Hussein?
P.S. Who the hell was posting under your name yesterday?
My impression is that someone times alliances have to be made with bad guys in order to fight other bad guys.
If you have time, I'd like your opinion on the moveon.org's efforts under the "this might be too american" post. My friend put that up for me yesterday.
For your stance to be consistent youll have to start calling for the indictment of Cheney, Rumsfeld and several others in this administration as collusionists with Saddam's brutal genocide. Otherwise leave the determination of a nation's leadership up to the people themselves to decide.
Whether you like it or not, international law protects our way of life from foreign domination as much as it oversees the sovereignty of other nations' way of life. Doesnt make it acceptable, but without it we too may well be on the receiving end of invasion when our time as the superpower ends.
Im willing to bet that you wont be supporting invasions on spurious and fabricated grounds when its your neighbourhood being occupied.
Cape May? Well, there's this hairy guy should be arrested for wearing a thong on the beach.
But, I know what you mean. But, it is difficult for me to root for standing by and allowing people like Saddam to rule.
You have to realise eventually that the real criminals which need to be pulled down are those in our own capitol who will glibly get you riled up on some issue of which you actually know absolutely nothing in order to justify actions about which they do not simultaneously provide you with sufficient information to fully understand the ramifications.
Its simple mob mentality dynamics at work and they know it.
Where were the warmongers and their heartfelt sentiment for the wellbeing of the Iraqi people when subsequent US administrations were adamantly obstructing any effort to remove the ineffective sanctions which were responsible for more widespread death and suffering than even Saddam himself?
These issues were not broadcast to you daily throughout the 90's simply because Washington is intent to keep its policy pursuits as much as possible outside the scope of public scrutiny. Thats the sham that belies all their claims of serving the American public, they serve only themselves and their elite cohorts.
W've long since gotten sick of el jocko and his neanderthilic rah rah "we can do no wrong" nonsense.
One account, one user... change your password and spare us the guessing game.