Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options

Pornography - a place in society?

Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
This is a political question, rather than one which should be left for the "sex" crowd to answer...

Recent laws passed in the UK mean that a new film rating is created - R18. Films in this classification can show erections, oral and penetrative sex, S&M etc although restrictions are still in place for bestiality, necrophilia and scenes depicting fecal matter (these being covered under the UK Obscenity Act).

What I want to know is if people believe that there is a place for this new rating, do you believe that pornography leads to increased sex crimes and what the experience is abroad...what are your laws?

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I think there is a place for this, if people in this sociaty want to watch that kind of thing, and we claim to have freedom of speech and the arts.

    In fact i'm happier that this be done than simply relaxing the obsentity laws, as it means people will know what they are watching and have a fair warning.

    Providing the viewer is a responsible adult it should be fine, unfortunatly we seem to be getting worse at the art of changing children into responsible adults. I guess thats why this board is good.
    The new system may lead to trouble if younger people start getting to see them though, and this resposibility falls (mainly) on the parents.

    It certainly makes more sense to have this than to decide if a film can get seen by the morals of thr individual watching it. Under the proposed system it will just get a higher rating.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Just more of the same..Nanny state bullshit...The 18 rating is perfectly fine as it is. There is no legal problems with 18 year old watching porn of that kind anyway so why they need to make an extra rating is beyond me. Its just common sense as to whether something is a porno film or whether a film has sex within as simply part of the film....If I buy a dvd rated 18 with a title such as 'fuck my 19 year old asshole' then im pretty sure i know what the dvd is gonna contain. This stuff is all legal at the moment anyway isnt it? Even the adultchannel shows hardcore stuff(or so im told).

    Who exactly is this rating supposed to protect?

    No pornography does not lead to more sex crimes. Those who commit sex crimes are those who are already predisposed to commit sex crimes, watching some porno isnt going to spur any normal person into doing something.

    Ive seen every possible genre of porn and ive not turned into a sex fiend as yet.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Balddog :

    Currently you are not alowed to show erect penis's (penii ???) on film, or full penatritive sex, or (maybe) male orgasm. So this will alow new things to be seen.

    But either way, is haveing a seperate certificate just for sex is no bad thing. it lets people know what they are in for.

    Added to that i'm not sure that the current system is working. How many 15 year olds do you know that have never seen an 18 rated film?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I actually believe that it is the lack of exposure to any kind of sexual material that might have a negative effect. By banning the showing of most sexual activities on cinemas/TV we are sending the wrong message about sex and damaging the chances of teenagers growing up with a healthy sex attitude.

    Back in Spain me and every other 15 year-old who so wanted would just walk into a video shop and rent the porn film of their choice (and we're talking proper hardcore here) for viewing with their girlfriends/boyfriends or just with some mates. Illegal as it might be, no one makes a fuss about it, least of all the video shop attendant. My friends and I have all grown up into sexually healthy, balanced people and I don't think Spain has a higher rate of sexual crimes than elsewhere. If anything it's lower than in Britain. So as far as I'm concerned porn does not harm individuals or society as a whole. Another completely different issue is to whether is degrading to the 'actors' who are involved, and to women in particular.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Balddog
    This stuff is all legal at the moment anyway isnt it? Even the adultchannel shows hardcore stuff(or so im told).

    Nah, even these films will only be available through licenced sex shops, so you aren't going to see them in Woolworths anytime soon :D

    As for the adult channel, its still very much soft core, and cut to the max, you can see female genetalia, but nothing penetrating and no shots of aroused men.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    The internet has warped my fragile little mind...Remind me to stop ordering those porn dvds from amsterdam :D

    Well then im all for it then, although id still rather see em on a normal 18 cert.
    Added to that i'm not sure that the current system is working. How many 15 year olds do you know that have never seen an 18 rated film?

    Im not quite sure how making another rating will help that. The laws are fine, they just arent enforced and they are (rightly)ignored by parents. Besides, the ratings arent even any good. They are made by these film censors who dont have a clue about the real world. I dont have a problem with a 15 year old seeing an 18 rated film.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Balddog
    . They are made by these film censors who dont have a clue about the real world. I dont have a problem with a 15 year old seeing an 18 rated film.

    That's because they have to take politics into consideration and no politican has the balls to say such a thing.

    It really is laughable that I can watch two people have sex, in glorious detail, but I cannot buy a video of it from any high street store.

    More laughable that a 16-y-o can have sex, but not watch it on film.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    What if they tape themselves doing it? :D
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Aladdin
    What if they tape themselves doing it? :D

    Then they should send it to me and I will ensure that it is distributed in the correct manner ;)
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I believe its a sensible idea. It lets you see at a glance how much sex the movie you've just picked is likely to contain. Of course the title might give it away, but Im sure as porn movies become more mainstream it'll become harder to tell.
    It doesn't affect me anyway, I'm too much of a wuss to walk into a sex shop, Ann Summers with my gf is as far as I'll go lol.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Man Of Kent

    More laughable that a 16-y-o can have sex, but not watch it on film.

    Personally I think the age of consent should be raised to 18, but thats another debate entirely.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I think a new rating would be better...18 films now can show explicit sex scenes, but not full penetration, and that aint everyones cup of tea.

    About time hardcore is allowed over here, it was a stupid nanny-state rule. Any old (or young) fool can look at hardcore porn on the net, but cant rent it out. The "Mull of Kintyre" rule was as stupid as the rule that meant all porn actresses in the 1960s had to be shaved, as pubic hair was indecent.

    Id be more worried about violent movies than sex movies...films like Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction are far more damaging than seeing two peopel fucking. As usual in this country sex is seen as worse than brutally murdering someone.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Interesting point, Kermit that acts of destroying life are fine but the creation of new life is thought of as "obscene". :rolleyes: :confused:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    In my mind, pornography does not lead to sex crime and does not enduce any tendency for a man to rape. If anything somebody with a predispostion to violence against women would be inclined to rape after viewing porn; a rational or mentally stable man would not.

    Ultimately I have no major problem with pornography. I feel if the participants of porn are consenting adults (this naturally negates paedophilia) and they enter the industry of their own volition then there is no 'unethical' aspect within pornography.
Sign In or Register to comment.