Home Community Announcements
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. For Crisis Support (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Want to share your experience of using our Community?

We're collecting Community Case Studies which could be used on our website, on social media, shared with our volunteers, or shared with third parties who may be interested to hear how online communities help people.

Click here to fill out our anonymous form

Community Updates 2026

2456

Comments

  • BensonEBensonE Posts: 253 The Mix Regular
    eylah wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    @BensonE I warned of this endlessly. The Online safety act is so extremely vague that much is up to interpretation, and they jump to immediate worst case interpretations to avoid the risk of getting fined. If they can't show that harmful content is actively being prevented from being posted under section 10 of the Online safety act 2023, then in risk wary minds, Ofcom could decide to say that is not sufficiant action to uphold this part of act. They simply won't take the risk.

    BensonE wrote: »
    Dancer wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    We are allowed to know this information.

    I could get act up and read it my self to find Clause (if there is one) but i rather mix tell us what clause they are referencing

    Exact wording is as follows under the act. I assume this is what they are basing it off:

    10 (2) A duty, in relation to a service, to take or use proportionate measures relating to the design or operation of the service to—
    (a) prevent individuals from encountering priority illegal content by means of the service,
    (b) effectively mitigate and manage the risk of the service being used for the commission or facilitation of a priority offence, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service, and
    (c) effectively mitigate and manage the risks of harm to individuals, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service.

    10 (3) A duty to operate a service using proportionate systems and processes designed to—
    (a) minimise the length of time for which any priority illegal content is present;
    (b) where the provider is alerted by a person to the presence of any illegal content, or becomes aware of it in any other way, swiftly take down such content.

    10 (4) These duties apply across all areas of a service — including how it is designed, operated and used — and require the provider to take or use measures in areas including: content moderation, policies on user access, features and algorithms, user controls, etc.

    I recommend people read my Online safety act piece to understand my concerns around the act, and to see why this was a predictable outcome of it.

    Nathan im asking @TheMix as before you have massive hatred for online safety act and anyone of us could read act and make assumptions hence I was asking the mix directly

    i don’t think you should speak to nathan like that when he’s done nothing but speak abt what his opinion is 🤷🏼‍♀️. and he’s allowed to talk abt his opinion like anyone else is..

    The question was aimed at the mix for a very clear reason and Nathan basically used it as a platform to share his hatred for the act
  • NathanNathan Community Connector Posts: 2,933 Boards Guru
    BensonE wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    @BensonE I warned of this endlessly. The Online safety act is so extremely vague that much is up to interpretation, and they jump to immediate worst case interpretations to avoid the risk of getting fined. If they can't show that harmful content is actively being prevented from being posted under section 10 of the Online safety act 2023, then in risk wary minds, Ofcom could decide to say that is not sufficiant action to uphold this part of act. They simply won't take the risk.

    BensonE wrote: »
    Dancer wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    We are allowed to know this information.

    I could get act up and read it my self to find Clause (if there is one) but i rather mix tell us what clause they are referencing

    Exact wording is as follows under the act. I assume this is what they are basing it off:

    10 (2) A duty, in relation to a service, to take or use proportionate measures relating to the design or operation of the service to—
    (a) prevent individuals from encountering priority illegal content by means of the service,
    (b) effectively mitigate and manage the risk of the service being used for the commission or facilitation of a priority offence, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service, and
    (c) effectively mitigate and manage the risks of harm to individuals, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service.

    10 (3) A duty to operate a service using proportionate systems and processes designed to—
    (a) minimise the length of time for which any priority illegal content is present;
    (b) where the provider is alerted by a person to the presence of any illegal content, or becomes aware of it in any other way, swiftly take down such content.

    10 (4) These duties apply across all areas of a service — including how it is designed, operated and used — and require the provider to take or use measures in areas including: content moderation, policies on user access, features and algorithms, user controls, etc.

    I recommend people read my Online safety act piece to understand my concerns around the act, and to see why this was a predictable outcome of it.

    Nathan im asking @TheMix as before you have massive hatred for online safety act and anyone of us could read act and make assumptions hence I was asking the mix directly

    @BensonE i don't have a hatred for it, i even made recomendations for it's improvement so it actually works for safeguarding. None of my thread about the OSA is assumption but verifiable fact. I pointed out it's flaws, pointed out how the consequence would be platforms overmoderating to try and cover themselves legally, and how the act fails in technological terms to prevent harm. My assumption here is that the act falls under that section of the act, which clearly can be interpreted as meaning premoderation by somebody risk wary enough to over themselves legally. I think it's ridiculous myself, but it's almost certainly that.
  • NathanNathan Community Connector Posts: 2,933 Boards Guru
    eylah wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    @BensonE I warned of this endlessly. The Online safety act is so extremely vague that much is up to interpretation, and they jump to immediate worst case interpretations to avoid the risk of getting fined. If they can't show that harmful content is actively being prevented from being posted under section 10 of the Online safety act 2023, then in risk wary minds, Ofcom could decide to say that is not sufficiant action to uphold this part of act. They simply won't take the risk.

    BensonE wrote: »
    Dancer wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    We are allowed to know this information.

    I could get act up and read it my self to find Clause (if there is one) but i rather mix tell us what clause they are referencing

    Exact wording is as follows under the act. I assume this is what they are basing it off:

    10 (2) A duty, in relation to a service, to take or use proportionate measures relating to the design or operation of the service to—
    (a) prevent individuals from encountering priority illegal content by means of the service,
    (b) effectively mitigate and manage the risk of the service being used for the commission or facilitation of a priority offence, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service, and
    (c) effectively mitigate and manage the risks of harm to individuals, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service.

    10 (3) A duty to operate a service using proportionate systems and processes designed to—
    (a) minimise the length of time for which any priority illegal content is present;
    (b) where the provider is alerted by a person to the presence of any illegal content, or becomes aware of it in any other way, swiftly take down such content.

    10 (4) These duties apply across all areas of a service — including how it is designed, operated and used — and require the provider to take or use measures in areas including: content moderation, policies on user access, features and algorithms, user controls, etc.

    I recommend people read my Online safety act piece to understand my concerns around the act, and to see why this was a predictable outcome of it.

    Nathan im asking @TheMix as before you have massive hatred for online safety act and anyone of us could read act and make assumptions hence I was asking the mix directly

    i don’t think you should speak to nathan like that when he’s done nothing but speak abt what his opinion is 🤷🏼‍♀️. and he’s allowed to talk abt his opinion like anyone else is..

    @eylah thanks my favourite twat <3 , i've been dealing with this rudeness from him for ages for absolutely no reason in chats.
  • eylaheylah Community Connector Posts: 10,487 An Original Mixlorian
    BensonE wrote: »
    eylah wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    @BensonE I warned of this endlessly. The Online safety act is so extremely vague that much is up to interpretation, and they jump to immediate worst case interpretations to avoid the risk of getting fined. If they can't show that harmful content is actively being prevented from being posted under section 10 of the Online safety act 2023, then in risk wary minds, Ofcom could decide to say that is not sufficiant action to uphold this part of act. They simply won't take the risk.

    BensonE wrote: »
    Dancer wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    We are allowed to know this information.

    I could get act up and read it my self to find Clause (if there is one) but i rather mix tell us what clause they are referencing

    Exact wording is as follows under the act. I assume this is what they are basing it off:

    10 (2) A duty, in relation to a service, to take or use proportionate measures relating to the design or operation of the service to—
    (a) prevent individuals from encountering priority illegal content by means of the service,
    (b) effectively mitigate and manage the risk of the service being used for the commission or facilitation of a priority offence, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service, and
    (c) effectively mitigate and manage the risks of harm to individuals, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service.

    10 (3) A duty to operate a service using proportionate systems and processes designed to—
    (a) minimise the length of time for which any priority illegal content is present;
    (b) where the provider is alerted by a person to the presence of any illegal content, or becomes aware of it in any other way, swiftly take down such content.

    10 (4) These duties apply across all areas of a service — including how it is designed, operated and used — and require the provider to take or use measures in areas including: content moderation, policies on user access, features and algorithms, user controls, etc.

    I recommend people read my Online safety act piece to understand my concerns around the act, and to see why this was a predictable outcome of it.

    Nathan im asking @TheMix as before you have massive hatred for online safety act and anyone of us could read act and make assumptions hence I was asking the mix directly

    i don’t think you should speak to nathan like that when he’s done nothing but speak abt what his opinion is 🤷🏼‍♀️. and he’s allowed to talk abt his opinion like anyone else is..

    The question was aimed at the mix for a very clear reason and Nathan basically used it as a platform to share his hatred for the act

    ive never seen him post abt anything like that? and he’s allowed his opinion. it’s a community where we reply to each other.. so he’s allowed to have his opinion.
    ppl dont always need advice. sometimes all they rly need is a hand to hold. an ear to listen. and a heart to understand them. 🧸
  • eylaheylah Community Connector Posts: 10,487 An Original Mixlorian
    Nathan wrote: »
    eylah wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    @BensonE I warned of this endlessly. The Online safety act is so extremely vague that much is up to interpretation, and they jump to immediate worst case interpretations to avoid the risk of getting fined. If they can't show that harmful content is actively being prevented from being posted under section 10 of the Online safety act 2023, then in risk wary minds, Ofcom could decide to say that is not sufficiant action to uphold this part of act. They simply won't take the risk.

    BensonE wrote: »
    Dancer wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    We are allowed to know this information.

    I could get act up and read it my self to find Clause (if there is one) but i rather mix tell us what clause they are referencing

    Exact wording is as follows under the act. I assume this is what they are basing it off:

    10 (2) A duty, in relation to a service, to take or use proportionate measures relating to the design or operation of the service to—
    (a) prevent individuals from encountering priority illegal content by means of the service,
    (b) effectively mitigate and manage the risk of the service being used for the commission or facilitation of a priority offence, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service, and
    (c) effectively mitigate and manage the risks of harm to individuals, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service.

    10 (3) A duty to operate a service using proportionate systems and processes designed to—
    (a) minimise the length of time for which any priority illegal content is present;
    (b) where the provider is alerted by a person to the presence of any illegal content, or becomes aware of it in any other way, swiftly take down such content.

    10 (4) These duties apply across all areas of a service — including how it is designed, operated and used — and require the provider to take or use measures in areas including: content moderation, policies on user access, features and algorithms, user controls, etc.

    I recommend people read my Online safety act piece to understand my concerns around the act, and to see why this was a predictable outcome of it.

    Nathan im asking @TheMix as before you have massive hatred for online safety act and anyone of us could read act and make assumptions hence I was asking the mix directly

    i don’t think you should speak to nathan like that when he’s done nothing but speak abt what his opinion is 🤷🏼‍♀️. and he’s allowed to talk abt his opinion like anyone else is..

    @eylah thanks my favourite twat <3 , i've been dealing with this rudeness from him for ages for absolutely no reason in chats.

    sry to hear that my favourite twat. you’re allowed your opinion and are entitled to talk abt your opinions. <3
    ppl dont always need advice. sometimes all they rly need is a hand to hold. an ear to listen. and a heart to understand them. 🧸
  • NathanNathan Community Connector Posts: 2,933 Boards Guru
    BensonE wrote: »
    eylah wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    @BensonE I warned of this endlessly. The Online safety act is so extremely vague that much is up to interpretation, and they jump to immediate worst case interpretations to avoid the risk of getting fined. If they can't show that harmful content is actively being prevented from being posted under section 10 of the Online safety act 2023, then in risk wary minds, Ofcom could decide to say that is not sufficiant action to uphold this part of act. They simply won't take the risk.

    BensonE wrote: »
    Dancer wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    We are allowed to know this information.

    I could get act up and read it my self to find Clause (if there is one) but i rather mix tell us what clause they are referencing

    Exact wording is as follows under the act. I assume this is what they are basing it off:

    10 (2) A duty, in relation to a service, to take or use proportionate measures relating to the design or operation of the service to—
    (a) prevent individuals from encountering priority illegal content by means of the service,
    (b) effectively mitigate and manage the risk of the service being used for the commission or facilitation of a priority offence, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service, and
    (c) effectively mitigate and manage the risks of harm to individuals, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service.

    10 (3) A duty to operate a service using proportionate systems and processes designed to—
    (a) minimise the length of time for which any priority illegal content is present;
    (b) where the provider is alerted by a person to the presence of any illegal content, or becomes aware of it in any other way, swiftly take down such content.

    10 (4) These duties apply across all areas of a service — including how it is designed, operated and used — and require the provider to take or use measures in areas including: content moderation, policies on user access, features and algorithms, user controls, etc.

    I recommend people read my Online safety act piece to understand my concerns around the act, and to see why this was a predictable outcome of it.

    Nathan im asking @TheMix as before you have massive hatred for online safety act and anyone of us could read act and make assumptions hence I was asking the mix directly

    i don’t think you should speak to nathan like that when he’s done nothing but speak abt what his opinion is 🤷🏼‍♀️. and he’s allowed to talk abt his opinion like anyone else is..

    The question was aimed at the mix for a very clear reason and Nathan basically used it as a platform to share his hatred for the act

    @BensonE it's not a platform of hatred. my piece about the online safety act predicted the very real consequences of the act, recomended improvements to the act so it actually works for safeguarding, and only spoke factually with verious citations and sources. You on the other hand can't seem to tolerate somebody having a different opinion to you, and rather than debating the point if you disagree with it, just turn to rudeness, as per usual.
  • NathanNathan Community Connector Posts: 2,933 Boards Guru
    eylah wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    eylah wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    @BensonE I warned of this endlessly. The Online safety act is so extremely vague that much is up to interpretation, and they jump to immediate worst case interpretations to avoid the risk of getting fined. If they can't show that harmful content is actively being prevented from being posted under section 10 of the Online safety act 2023, then in risk wary minds, Ofcom could decide to say that is not sufficiant action to uphold this part of act. They simply won't take the risk.

    BensonE wrote: »
    Dancer wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    We are allowed to know this information.

    I could get act up and read it my self to find Clause (if there is one) but i rather mix tell us what clause they are referencing

    Exact wording is as follows under the act. I assume this is what they are basing it off:

    10 (2) A duty, in relation to a service, to take or use proportionate measures relating to the design or operation of the service to—
    (a) prevent individuals from encountering priority illegal content by means of the service,
    (b) effectively mitigate and manage the risk of the service being used for the commission or facilitation of a priority offence, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service, and
    (c) effectively mitigate and manage the risks of harm to individuals, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service.

    10 (3) A duty to operate a service using proportionate systems and processes designed to—
    (a) minimise the length of time for which any priority illegal content is present;
    (b) where the provider is alerted by a person to the presence of any illegal content, or becomes aware of it in any other way, swiftly take down such content.

    10 (4) These duties apply across all areas of a service — including how it is designed, operated and used — and require the provider to take or use measures in areas including: content moderation, policies on user access, features and algorithms, user controls, etc.

    I recommend people read my Online safety act piece to understand my concerns around the act, and to see why this was a predictable outcome of it.

    Nathan im asking @TheMix as before you have massive hatred for online safety act and anyone of us could read act and make assumptions hence I was asking the mix directly

    i don’t think you should speak to nathan like that when he’s done nothing but speak abt what his opinion is 🤷🏼‍♀️. and he’s allowed to talk abt his opinion like anyone else is..

    @eylah thanks my favourite twat <3 , i've been dealing with this rudeness from him for ages for absolutely no reason in chats.

    sry to hear that my favourite twat. you’re allowed your opinion and are entitled to talk abt your opinions. <3

    @eylah thank you, i really do appreciate you a huge amount <3
  • BensonEBensonE Posts: 253 The Mix Regular
    eylah wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    eylah wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    @BensonE I warned of this endlessly. The Online safety act is so extremely vague that much is up to interpretation, and they jump to immediate worst case interpretations to avoid the risk of getting fined. If they can't show that harmful content is actively being prevented from being posted under section 10 of the Online safety act 2023, then in risk wary minds, Ofcom could decide to say that is not sufficiant action to uphold this part of act. They simply won't take the risk.

    BensonE wrote: »
    Dancer wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    We are allowed to know this information.

    I could get act up and read it my self to find Clause (if there is one) but i rather mix tell us what clause they are referencing

    Exact wording is as follows under the act. I assume this is what they are basing it off:

    10 (2) A duty, in relation to a service, to take or use proportionate measures relating to the design or operation of the service to—
    (a) prevent individuals from encountering priority illegal content by means of the service,
    (b) effectively mitigate and manage the risk of the service being used for the commission or facilitation of a priority offence, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service, and
    (c) effectively mitigate and manage the risks of harm to individuals, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service.

    10 (3) A duty to operate a service using proportionate systems and processes designed to—
    (a) minimise the length of time for which any priority illegal content is present;
    (b) where the provider is alerted by a person to the presence of any illegal content, or becomes aware of it in any other way, swiftly take down such content.

    10 (4) These duties apply across all areas of a service — including how it is designed, operated and used — and require the provider to take or use measures in areas including: content moderation, policies on user access, features and algorithms, user controls, etc.

    I recommend people read my Online safety act piece to understand my concerns around the act, and to see why this was a predictable outcome of it.

    Nathan im asking @TheMix as before you have massive hatred for online safety act and anyone of us could read act and make assumptions hence I was asking the mix directly

    i don’t think you should speak to nathan like that when he’s done nothing but speak abt what his opinion is 🤷🏼‍♀️. and he’s allowed to talk abt his opinion like anyone else is..

    @eylah thanks my favourite twat <3 , i've been dealing with this rudeness from him for ages for absolutely no reason in chats.

    sry to hear that my favourite twat. you’re allowed your opinion and are entitled to talk abt your opinions. <3

    Why then does Nathan always have ago at my opinion and use my comments as a platform to share his views

    Its targetive behaviour my question today was solely aimed at the mix and was done on boards hoping mix would give answer publicly for everyone to have answers
  • eylaheylah Community Connector Posts: 10,487 An Original Mixlorian
    Dancer wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    eylah wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    @BensonE I warned of this endlessly. The Online safety act is so extremely vague that much is up to interpretation, and they jump to immediate worst case interpretations to avoid the risk of getting fined. If they can't show that harmful content is actively being prevented from being posted under section 10 of the Online safety act 2023, then in risk wary minds, Ofcom could decide to say that is not sufficiant action to uphold this part of act. They simply won't take the risk.

    BensonE wrote: »
    Dancer wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    We are allowed to know this information.

    I could get act up and read it my self to find Clause (if there is one) but i rather mix tell us what clause they are referencing

    Exact wording is as follows under the act. I assume this is what they are basing it off:

    10 (2) A duty, in relation to a service, to take or use proportionate measures relating to the design or operation of the service to—
    (a) prevent individuals from encountering priority illegal content by means of the service,
    (b) effectively mitigate and manage the risk of the service being used for the commission or facilitation of a priority offence, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service, and
    (c) effectively mitigate and manage the risks of harm to individuals, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service.

    10 (3) A duty to operate a service using proportionate systems and processes designed to—
    (a) minimise the length of time for which any priority illegal content is present;
    (b) where the provider is alerted by a person to the presence of any illegal content, or becomes aware of it in any other way, swiftly take down such content.

    10 (4) These duties apply across all areas of a service — including how it is designed, operated and used — and require the provider to take or use measures in areas including: content moderation, policies on user access, features and algorithms, user controls, etc.

    I recommend people read my Online safety act piece to understand my concerns around the act, and to see why this was a predictable outcome of it.

    Nathan im asking @TheMix as before you have massive hatred for online safety act and anyone of us could read act and make assumptions hence I was asking the mix directly

    i don’t think you should speak to nathan like that when he’s done nothing but speak abt what his opinion is 🤷🏼‍♀️. and he’s allowed to talk abt his opinion like anyone else is..

    @eylah thanks my favourite twat <3 , i've been dealing with this rudeness from him for ages for absolutely no reason in chats.

    Well you`re a prick. I`ve heard about what you`ve been like.

    that’s just bare rude. you don’t talk to ppl with such rudeness.
    ppl dont always need advice. sometimes all they rly need is a hand to hold. an ear to listen. and a heart to understand them. 🧸
  • DancerDancer Community Connector Posts: 8,294 Legendary Poster
    You think you`re top dog @Nathan and you`re not. And you deliberately ignore users that seem to say any little thing you disagree with.
    "There's a part of me I can't get back. A little girl grew up too fast. All it took was once. I'll never be the same." ~ Demi Lovato
    "The way that I have found the light in my life is through the expressive arts because I know that I will be accepted for the way I am." ~ Me
    "I'm going to get strong again and see you soon. " ~ Anonymous 
  • NathanNathan Community Connector Posts: 2,933 Boards Guru
    Dancer wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    eylah wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    @BensonE I warned of this endlessly. The Online safety act is so extremely vague that much is up to interpretation, and they jump to immediate worst case interpretations to avoid the risk of getting fined. If they can't show that harmful content is actively being prevented from being posted under section 10 of the Online safety act 2023, then in risk wary minds, Ofcom could decide to say that is not sufficiant action to uphold this part of act. They simply won't take the risk.

    BensonE wrote: »
    Dancer wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    We are allowed to know this information.

    I could get act up and read it my self to find Clause (if there is one) but i rather mix tell us what clause they are referencing

    Exact wording is as follows under the act. I assume this is what they are basing it off:

    10 (2) A duty, in relation to a service, to take or use proportionate measures relating to the design or operation of the service to—
    (a) prevent individuals from encountering priority illegal content by means of the service,
    (b) effectively mitigate and manage the risk of the service being used for the commission or facilitation of a priority offence, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service, and
    (c) effectively mitigate and manage the risks of harm to individuals, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service.

    10 (3) A duty to operate a service using proportionate systems and processes designed to—
    (a) minimise the length of time for which any priority illegal content is present;
    (b) where the provider is alerted by a person to the presence of any illegal content, or becomes aware of it in any other way, swiftly take down such content.

    10 (4) These duties apply across all areas of a service — including how it is designed, operated and used — and require the provider to take or use measures in areas including: content moderation, policies on user access, features and algorithms, user controls, etc.

    I recommend people read my Online safety act piece to understand my concerns around the act, and to see why this was a predictable outcome of it.

    Nathan im asking @TheMix as before you have massive hatred for online safety act and anyone of us could read act and make assumptions hence I was asking the mix directly

    i don’t think you should speak to nathan like that when he’s done nothing but speak abt what his opinion is 🤷🏼‍♀️. and he’s allowed to talk abt his opinion like anyone else is..

    @eylah thanks my favourite twat <3 , i've been dealing with this rudeness from him for ages for absolutely no reason in chats.

    Well you`re a prick. I`ve heard about what you`ve been like.

    @Dancer that's rather funny coming from you. I've never been mean, hostile, rude or nasty to anybody on here. I've offered support to everybody on here who's needed it. So please, let me know exactly where.
  • eylaheylah Community Connector Posts: 10,487 An Original Mixlorian
    @TheMix . how is that comment allowed??!!
    ppl dont always need advice. sometimes all they rly need is a hand to hold. an ear to listen. and a heart to understand them. 🧸
  • BensonEBensonE Posts: 253 The Mix Regular
    Also as a person whom has a disability i find the term twat highly offensive and shou
    eylah wrote: »
    Dancer wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    eylah wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    @BensonE I warned of this endlessly. The Online safety act is so extremely vague that much is up to interpretation, and they jump to immediate worst case interpretations to avoid the risk of getting fined. If they can't show that harmful content is actively being prevented from being posted under section 10 of the Online safety act 2023, then in risk wary minds, Ofcom could decide to say that is not sufficiant action to uphold this part of act. They simply won't take the risk.

    BensonE wrote: »
    Dancer wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    We are allowed to know this information.

    I could get act up and read it my self to find Clause (if there is one) but i rather mix tell us what clause they are referencing

    Exact wording is as follows under the act. I assume this is what they are basing it off:

    10 (2) A duty, in relation to a service, to take or use proportionate measures relating to the design or operation of the service to—
    (a) prevent individuals from encountering priority illegal content by means of the service,
    (b) effectively mitigate and manage the risk of the service being used for the commission or facilitation of a priority offence, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service, and
    (c) effectively mitigate and manage the risks of harm to individuals, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service.

    10 (3) A duty to operate a service using proportionate systems and processes designed to—
    (a) minimise the length of time for which any priority illegal content is present;
    (b) where the provider is alerted by a person to the presence of any illegal content, or becomes aware of it in any other way, swiftly take down such content.

    10 (4) These duties apply across all areas of a service — including how it is designed, operated and used — and require the provider to take or use measures in areas including: content moderation, policies on user access, features and algorithms, user controls, etc.

    I recommend people read my Online safety act piece to understand my concerns around the act, and to see why this was a predictable outcome of it.

    Nathan im asking @TheMix as before you have massive hatred for online safety act and anyone of us could read act and make assumptions hence I was asking the mix directly

    i don’t think you should speak to nathan like that when he’s done nothing but speak abt what his opinion is 🤷🏼‍♀️. and he’s allowed to talk abt his opinion like anyone else is..

    @eylah thanks my favourite twat <3 , i've been dealing with this rudeness from him for ages for absolutely no reason in chats.

    Well you`re a prick. I`ve heard about what you`ve been like.

    that’s just bare rude. you don’t talk to ppl with such rudeness.

    You just said Nathan allowed a opinion so is Dancer not allowed one?

    Freedom of speech which you implied Nathan has applies to all
  • DancerDancer Community Connector Posts: 8,294 Legendary Poster
    Nathan wrote: »
    Dancer wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    eylah wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    @BensonE I warned of this endlessly. The Online safety act is so extremely vague that much is up to interpretation, and they jump to immediate worst case interpretations to avoid the risk of getting fined. If they can't show that harmful content is actively being prevented from being posted under section 10 of the Online safety act 2023, then in risk wary minds, Ofcom could decide to say that is not sufficiant action to uphold this part of act. They simply won't take the risk.

    BensonE wrote: »
    Dancer wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    We are allowed to know this information.

    I could get act up and read it my self to find Clause (if there is one) but i rather mix tell us what clause they are referencing

    Exact wording is as follows under the act. I assume this is what they are basing it off:

    10 (2) A duty, in relation to a service, to take or use proportionate measures relating to the design or operation of the service to—
    (a) prevent individuals from encountering priority illegal content by means of the service,
    (b) effectively mitigate and manage the risk of the service being used for the commission or facilitation of a priority offence, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service, and
    (c) effectively mitigate and manage the risks of harm to individuals, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service.

    10 (3) A duty to operate a service using proportionate systems and processes designed to—
    (a) minimise the length of time for which any priority illegal content is present;
    (b) where the provider is alerted by a person to the presence of any illegal content, or becomes aware of it in any other way, swiftly take down such content.

    10 (4) These duties apply across all areas of a service — including how it is designed, operated and used — and require the provider to take or use measures in areas including: content moderation, policies on user access, features and algorithms, user controls, etc.

    I recommend people read my Online safety act piece to understand my concerns around the act, and to see why this was a predictable outcome of it.

    Nathan im asking @TheMix as before you have massive hatred for online safety act and anyone of us could read act and make assumptions hence I was asking the mix directly

    i don’t think you should speak to nathan like that when he’s done nothing but speak abt what his opinion is 🤷🏼‍♀️. and he’s allowed to talk abt his opinion like anyone else is..

    @eylah thanks my favourite twat <3 , i've been dealing with this rudeness from him for ages for absolutely no reason in chats.

    Well you`re a prick. I`ve heard about what you`ve been like.

    @Dancer that's rather funny coming from you. I've never been mean, hostile, rude or nasty to anybody on here. I've offered support to everybody on here who's needed it. So please, let me know exactly where.

    Be glad that sharing screenshots of messages from other users is against the guidelines. But I will still back my friends.
    "There's a part of me I can't get back. A little girl grew up too fast. All it took was once. I'll never be the same." ~ Demi Lovato
    "The way that I have found the light in my life is through the expressive arts because I know that I will be accepted for the way I am." ~ Me
    "I'm going to get strong again and see you soon. " ~ Anonymous 
  • so_very_tiredso_very_tired Posts: 701 Part of The Mix Family
    edited January 16
    @Nathan, @eylah and @Dancer please take this somewhere else. This thread is about TheMix's new shitty updates, not for you three to argue.
  • eylaheylah Community Connector Posts: 10,487 An Original Mixlorian
    why are you ganging up on someone who’s done nothing wrong? then insulting him and being fucking disrespectful.. @Nathan is always there for other ppl here and you’re all being rude as fuck towards him.
    ppl dont always need advice. sometimes all they rly need is a hand to hold. an ear to listen. and a heart to understand them. 🧸
  • NathanNathan Community Connector Posts: 2,933 Boards Guru
    BensonE wrote: »
    eylah wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    eylah wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    @BensonE I warned of this endlessly. The Online safety act is so extremely vague that much is up to interpretation, and they jump to immediate worst case interpretations to avoid the risk of getting fined. If they can't show that harmful content is actively being prevented from being posted under section 10 of the Online safety act 2023, then in risk wary minds, Ofcom could decide to say that is not sufficiant action to uphold this part of act. They simply won't take the risk.

    BensonE wrote: »
    Dancer wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    We are allowed to know this information.

    I could get act up and read it my self to find Clause (if there is one) but i rather mix tell us what clause they are referencing

    Exact wording is as follows under the act. I assume this is what they are basing it off:

    10 (2) A duty, in relation to a service, to take or use proportionate measures relating to the design or operation of the service to—
    (a) prevent individuals from encountering priority illegal content by means of the service,
    (b) effectively mitigate and manage the risk of the service being used for the commission or facilitation of a priority offence, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service, and
    (c) effectively mitigate and manage the risks of harm to individuals, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service.

    10 (3) A duty to operate a service using proportionate systems and processes designed to—
    (a) minimise the length of time for which any priority illegal content is present;
    (b) where the provider is alerted by a person to the presence of any illegal content, or becomes aware of it in any other way, swiftly take down such content.

    10 (4) These duties apply across all areas of a service — including how it is designed, operated and used — and require the provider to take or use measures in areas including: content moderation, policies on user access, features and algorithms, user controls, etc.

    I recommend people read my Online safety act piece to understand my concerns around the act, and to see why this was a predictable outcome of it.

    Nathan im asking @TheMix as before you have massive hatred for online safety act and anyone of us could read act and make assumptions hence I was asking the mix directly

    i don’t think you should speak to nathan like that when he’s done nothing but speak abt what his opinion is 🤷🏼‍♀️. and he’s allowed to talk abt his opinion like anyone else is..

    @eylah thanks my favourite twat <3 , i've been dealing with this rudeness from him for ages for absolutely no reason in chats.

    sry to hear that my favourite twat. you’re allowed your opinion and are entitled to talk abt your opinions. <3

    Why then does Nathan always have ago at my opinion and use my comments as a platform to share his views

    Its targetive behaviour my question today was solely aimed at the mix and was done on boards hoping mix would give answer publicly for everyone to have answers

    @BensonE you asked a question on boards, i pointed the part of the act, and your getting hysterical over it, and imagining your being targeted. Are you paranoid or something, cause it's not standard behaviour to be that way.
  • BensonEBensonE Posts: 253 The Mix Regular
    Nathan wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    eylah wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    eylah wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    @BensonE I warned of this endlessly. The Online safety act is so extremely vague that much is up to interpretation, and they jump to immediate worst case interpretations to avoid the risk of getting fined. If they can't show that harmful content is actively being prevented from being posted under section 10 of the Online safety act 2023, then in risk wary minds, Ofcom could decide to say that is not sufficiant action to uphold this part of act. They simply won't take the risk.

    BensonE wrote: »
    Dancer wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    We are allowed to know this information.

    I could get act up and read it my self to find Clause (if there is one) but i rather mix tell us what clause they are referencing

    Exact wording is as follows under the act. I assume this is what they are basing it off:

    10 (2) A duty, in relation to a service, to take or use proportionate measures relating to the design or operation of the service to—
    (a) prevent individuals from encountering priority illegal content by means of the service,
    (b) effectively mitigate and manage the risk of the service being used for the commission or facilitation of a priority offence, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service, and
    (c) effectively mitigate and manage the risks of harm to individuals, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service.

    10 (3) A duty to operate a service using proportionate systems and processes designed to—
    (a) minimise the length of time for which any priority illegal content is present;
    (b) where the provider is alerted by a person to the presence of any illegal content, or becomes aware of it in any other way, swiftly take down such content.

    10 (4) These duties apply across all areas of a service — including how it is designed, operated and used — and require the provider to take or use measures in areas including: content moderation, policies on user access, features and algorithms, user controls, etc.

    I recommend people read my Online safety act piece to understand my concerns around the act, and to see why this was a predictable outcome of it.

    Nathan im asking @TheMix as before you have massive hatred for online safety act and anyone of us could read act and make assumptions hence I was asking the mix directly

    i don’t think you should speak to nathan like that when he’s done nothing but speak abt what his opinion is 🤷🏼‍♀️. and he’s allowed to talk abt his opinion like anyone else is..

    @eylah thanks my favourite twat <3 , i've been dealing with this rudeness from him for ages for absolutely no reason in chats.

    sry to hear that my favourite twat. you’re allowed your opinion and are entitled to talk abt your opinions. <3

    Why then does Nathan always have ago at my opinion and use my comments as a platform to share his views

    Its targetive behaviour my question today was solely aimed at the mix and was done on boards hoping mix would give answer publicly for everyone to have answers

    @BensonE you asked a question on boards, i pointed the part of the act, and your getting hysterical over it, and imagining your being targeted. Are you paranoid or something, cause it's not standard behaviour to be that way.

    The exact question was for the mix i asked it directly to the mix
  • eylaheylah Community Connector Posts: 10,487 An Original Mixlorian
    BensonE wrote: »
    Also as a person whom has a disability i find the term twat highly offensive and shou
    eylah wrote: »
    Dancer wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    eylah wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    @BensonE I warned of this endlessly. The Online safety act is so extremely vague that much is up to interpretation, and they jump to immediate worst case interpretations to avoid the risk of getting fined. If they can't show that harmful content is actively being prevented from being posted under section 10 of the Online safety act 2023, then in risk wary minds, Ofcom could decide to say that is not sufficiant action to uphold this part of act. They simply won't take the risk.

    BensonE wrote: »
    Dancer wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    We are allowed to know this information.

    I could get act up and read it my self to find Clause (if there is one) but i rather mix tell us what clause they are referencing

    Exact wording is as follows under the act. I assume this is what they are basing it off:

    10 (2) A duty, in relation to a service, to take or use proportionate measures relating to the design or operation of the service to—
    (a) prevent individuals from encountering priority illegal content by means of the service,
    (b) effectively mitigate and manage the risk of the service being used for the commission or facilitation of a priority offence, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service, and
    (c) effectively mitigate and manage the risks of harm to individuals, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service.

    10 (3) A duty to operate a service using proportionate systems and processes designed to—
    (a) minimise the length of time for which any priority illegal content is present;
    (b) where the provider is alerted by a person to the presence of any illegal content, or becomes aware of it in any other way, swiftly take down such content.

    10 (4) These duties apply across all areas of a service — including how it is designed, operated and used — and require the provider to take or use measures in areas including: content moderation, policies on user access, features and algorithms, user controls, etc.

    I recommend people read my Online safety act piece to understand my concerns around the act, and to see why this was a predictable outcome of it.

    Nathan im asking @TheMix as before you have massive hatred for online safety act and anyone of us could read act and make assumptions hence I was asking the mix directly

    i don’t think you should speak to nathan like that when he’s done nothing but speak abt what his opinion is 🤷🏼‍♀️. and he’s allowed to talk abt his opinion like anyone else is..

    @eylah thanks my favourite twat <3 , i've been dealing with this rudeness from him for ages for absolutely no reason in chats.

    Well you`re a prick. I`ve heard about what you`ve been like.

    that’s just bare rude. you don’t talk to ppl with such rudeness.

    You just said Nathan allowed a opinion so is Dancer not allowed one?

    Freedom of speech which you implied Nathan has applies to all

    ive been saying as a joke me and @Nathan have lmao. 🤣 wasn’t an insult or aimed at you was it?
    ppl dont always need advice. sometimes all they rly need is a hand to hold. an ear to listen. and a heart to understand them. 🧸
  • NathanNathan Community Connector Posts: 2,933 Boards Guru
    edited January 16
    BensonE wrote: »
    Also as a person whom has a disability i find the term twat highly offensive and shou
    eylah wrote: »
    Dancer wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    eylah wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    @BensonE I warned of this endlessly. The Online safety act is so extremely vague that much is up to interpretation, and they jump to immediate worst case interpretations to avoid the risk of getting fined. If they can't show that harmful content is actively being prevented from being posted under section 10 of the Online safety act 2023, then in risk wary minds, Ofcom could decide to say that is not sufficiant action to uphold this part of act. They simply won't take the risk.

    BensonE wrote: »
    Dancer wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    We are allowed to know this information.

    I could get act up and read it my self to find Clause (if there is one) but i rather mix tell us what clause they are referencing

    Exact wording is as follows under the act. I assume this is what they are basing it off:

    10 (2) A duty, in relation to a service, to take or use proportionate measures relating to the design or operation of the service to—
    (a) prevent individuals from encountering priority illegal content by means of the service,
    (b) effectively mitigate and manage the risk of the service being used for the commission or facilitation of a priority offence, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service, and
    (c) effectively mitigate and manage the risks of harm to individuals, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service.

    10 (3) A duty to operate a service using proportionate systems and processes designed to—
    (a) minimise the length of time for which any priority illegal content is present;
    (b) where the provider is alerted by a person to the presence of any illegal content, or becomes aware of it in any other way, swiftly take down such content.

    10 (4) These duties apply across all areas of a service — including how it is designed, operated and used — and require the provider to take or use measures in areas including: content moderation, policies on user access, features and algorithms, user controls, etc.

    I recommend people read my Online safety act piece to understand my concerns around the act, and to see why this was a predictable outcome of it.

    Nathan im asking @TheMix as before you have massive hatred for online safety act and anyone of us could read act and make assumptions hence I was asking the mix directly

    i don’t think you should speak to nathan like that when he’s done nothing but speak abt what his opinion is 🤷🏼‍♀️. and he’s allowed to talk abt his opinion like anyone else is..

    @eylah thanks my favourite twat <3 , i've been dealing with this rudeness from him for ages for absolutely no reason in chats.

    Well you`re a prick. I`ve heard about what you`ve been like.

    that’s just bare rude. you don’t talk to ppl with such rudeness.

    You just said Nathan allowed a opinion so is Dancer not allowed one?

    Freedom of speech which you implied Nathan has applies to all

    @BensonE a disability doesn't give you the right to be rude to anybody. It's not a shield to give you immunity from punishment for being rude and nasty to others. I have an opinion on the online safety act, and because you disagree, i'm a pr**k? It's honestly delusional.
    Post edited by Verity on
  • eylaheylah Community Connector Posts: 10,487 An Original Mixlorian
    ppl dont always need advice. sometimes all they rly need is a hand to hold. an ear to listen. and a heart to understand them. 🧸
  • NathanNathan Community Connector Posts: 2,933 Boards Guru
    edited January 16
    Dancer wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    Dancer wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    eylah wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    @BensonE I warned of this endlessly. The Online safety act is so extremely vague that much is up to interpretation, and they jump to immediate worst case interpretations to avoid the risk of getting fined. If they can't show that harmful content is actively being prevented from being posted under section 10 of the Online safety act 2023, then in risk wary minds, Ofcom could decide to say that is not sufficiant action to uphold this part of act. They simply won't take the risk.

    BensonE wrote: »
    Dancer wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    We are allowed to know this information.

    I could get act up and read it my self to find Clause (if there is one) but i rather mix tell us what clause they are referencing

    Exact wording is as follows under the act. I assume this is what they are basing it off:

    10 (2) A duty, in relation to a service, to take or use proportionate measures relating to the design or operation of the service to—
    (a) prevent individuals from encountering priority illegal content by means of the service,
    (b) effectively mitigate and manage the risk of the service being used for the commission or facilitation of a priority offence, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service, and
    (c) effectively mitigate and manage the risks of harm to individuals, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service.

    10 (3) A duty to operate a service using proportionate systems and processes designed to—
    (a) minimise the length of time for which any priority illegal content is present;
    (b) where the provider is alerted by a person to the presence of any illegal content, or becomes aware of it in any other way, swiftly take down such content.

    10 (4) These duties apply across all areas of a service — including how it is designed, operated and used — and require the provider to take or use measures in areas including: content moderation, policies on user access, features and algorithms, user controls, etc.

    I recommend people read my Online safety act piece to understand my concerns around the act, and to see why this was a predictable outcome of it.

    Nathan im asking @TheMix as before you have massive hatred for online safety act and anyone of us could read act and make assumptions hence I was asking the mix directly

    i don’t think you should speak to nathan like that when he’s done nothing but speak abt what his opinion is 🤷🏼‍♀️. and he’s allowed to talk abt his opinion like anyone else is..

    @eylah thanks my favourite twat <3 , i've been dealing with this rudeness from him for ages for absolutely no reason in chats.

    Well you`re a prick. I`ve heard about what you`ve been like.

    @Dancer that's rather funny coming from you. I've never been mean, hostile, rude or nasty to anybody on here. I've offered support to everybody on here who's needed it. So please, let me know exactly where.

    Be glad that sharing screenshots of messages from other users is against the guidelines. But I will still back my friends.

    @Dancer you are a bitter, insulting person, who thinks that people can insult others, and if they answer back, that person's a problem, but thank you for confirming you have screenshots but won't share, because i have no clue as to what i've said or done, because there isn't anything. I'm sure @TheMix will be happy to know that. You are genuinely not worth my time or effort.
  • Jayn21Jayn21 Posts: 63 Boards Initiate
    What’s said has been said now noine really needs to continue it
  • DancerDancer Community Connector Posts: 8,294 Legendary Poster
    edited January 16
    "There's a part of me I can't get back. A little girl grew up too fast. All it took was once. I'll never be the same." ~ Demi Lovato
    "The way that I have found the light in my life is through the expressive arts because I know that I will be accepted for the way I am." ~ Me
    "I'm going to get strong again and see you soon. " ~ Anonymous 
  • NathanNathan Community Connector Posts: 2,933 Boards Guru
    Jayn21 wrote: »
    What’s said has been said now noine really needs to continue it
    BensonE wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    eylah wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    eylah wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    @BensonE I warned of this endlessly. The Online safety act is so extremely vague that much is up to interpretation, and they jump to immediate worst case interpretations to avoid the risk of getting fined. If they can't show that harmful content is actively being prevented from being posted under section 10 of the Online safety act 2023, then in risk wary minds, Ofcom could decide to say that is not sufficiant action to uphold this part of act. They simply won't take the risk.

    BensonE wrote: »
    Dancer wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    We are allowed to know this information.

    I could get act up and read it my self to find Clause (if there is one) but i rather mix tell us what clause they are referencing

    Exact wording is as follows under the act. I assume this is what they are basing it off:

    10 (2) A duty, in relation to a service, to take or use proportionate measures relating to the design or operation of the service to—
    (a) prevent individuals from encountering priority illegal content by means of the service,
    (b) effectively mitigate and manage the risk of the service being used for the commission or facilitation of a priority offence, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service, and
    (c) effectively mitigate and manage the risks of harm to individuals, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service.

    10 (3) A duty to operate a service using proportionate systems and processes designed to—
    (a) minimise the length of time for which any priority illegal content is present;
    (b) where the provider is alerted by a person to the presence of any illegal content, or becomes aware of it in any other way, swiftly take down such content.

    10 (4) These duties apply across all areas of a service — including how it is designed, operated and used — and require the provider to take or use measures in areas including: content moderation, policies on user access, features and algorithms, user controls, etc.

    I recommend people read my Online safety act piece to understand my concerns around the act, and to see why this was a predictable outcome of it.

    Nathan im asking @TheMix as before you have massive hatred for online safety act and anyone of us could read act and make assumptions hence I was asking the mix directly

    i don’t think you should speak to nathan like that when he’s done nothing but speak abt what his opinion is 🤷🏼‍♀️. and he’s allowed to talk abt his opinion like anyone else is..

    @eylah thanks my favourite twat <3 , i've been dealing with this rudeness from him for ages for absolutely no reason in chats.

    sry to hear that my favourite twat. you’re allowed your opinion and are entitled to talk abt your opinions. <3

    Why then does Nathan always have ago at my opinion and use my comments as a platform to share his views

    Its targetive behaviour my question today was solely aimed at the mix and was done on boards hoping mix would give answer publicly for everyone to have answers

    @BensonE you asked a question on boards, i pointed the part of the act, and your getting hysterical over it, and imagining your being targeted. Are you paranoid or something, cause it's not standard behaviour to be that way.

    The exact question was for the mix i asked it directly to the mix

    @BensonE you instantly said you'd look it up and you'd find out yourself.
  • independent_independent_ Community Connector Posts: 10,113 An Original Mixlorian
    Why have I been tagged. I don’t think there’s any need for this at all. Everyone is entitled to an opinion and i have shared mine respectfully
    “Sometimes the people around you won’t understand your journey. They don’t need to, it’s not for them.”
  • BensonEBensonE Posts: 253 The Mix Regular
    Nathan wrote: »
    Jayn21 wrote: »
    What’s said has been said now noine really needs to continue it
    BensonE wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    eylah wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    eylah wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    Nathan wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    @BensonE I warned of this endlessly. The Online safety act is so extremely vague that much is up to interpretation, and they jump to immediate worst case interpretations to avoid the risk of getting fined. If they can't show that harmful content is actively being prevented from being posted under section 10 of the Online safety act 2023, then in risk wary minds, Ofcom could decide to say that is not sufficiant action to uphold this part of act. They simply won't take the risk.

    BensonE wrote: »
    Dancer wrote: »
    BensonE wrote: »
    @TheMix my question is where exactly under the online safety act does it state you must pre moderate posts on community places

    Can you please share the exact extract from the online safety act please

    We are allowed to know this information.

    I could get act up and read it my self to find Clause (if there is one) but i rather mix tell us what clause they are referencing

    Exact wording is as follows under the act. I assume this is what they are basing it off:

    10 (2) A duty, in relation to a service, to take or use proportionate measures relating to the design or operation of the service to—
    (a) prevent individuals from encountering priority illegal content by means of the service,
    (b) effectively mitigate and manage the risk of the service being used for the commission or facilitation of a priority offence, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service, and
    (c) effectively mitigate and manage the risks of harm to individuals, as identified in the most recent illegal content risk assessment of the service.

    10 (3) A duty to operate a service using proportionate systems and processes designed to—
    (a) minimise the length of time for which any priority illegal content is present;
    (b) where the provider is alerted by a person to the presence of any illegal content, or becomes aware of it in any other way, swiftly take down such content.

    10 (4) These duties apply across all areas of a service — including how it is designed, operated and used — and require the provider to take or use measures in areas including: content moderation, policies on user access, features and algorithms, user controls, etc.

    I recommend people read my Online safety act piece to understand my concerns around the act, and to see why this was a predictable outcome of it.

    Nathan im asking @TheMix as before you have massive hatred for online safety act and anyone of us could read act and make assumptions hence I was asking the mix directly

    i don’t think you should speak to nathan like that when he’s done nothing but speak abt what his opinion is 🤷🏼‍♀️. and he’s allowed to talk abt his opinion like anyone else is..

    @eylah thanks my favourite twat <3 , i've been dealing with this rudeness from him for ages for absolutely no reason in chats.

    sry to hear that my favourite twat. you’re allowed your opinion and are entitled to talk abt your opinions. <3

    Why then does Nathan always have ago at my opinion and use my comments as a platform to share his views

    Its targetive behaviour my question today was solely aimed at the mix and was done on boards hoping mix would give answer publicly for everyone to have answers

    @BensonE you asked a question on boards, i pointed the part of the act, and your getting hysterical over it, and imagining your being targeted. Are you paranoid or something, cause it's not standard behaviour to be that way.

    The exact question was for the mix i asked it directly to the mix

    @BensonE you instantly said you'd look it up and you'd find out yourself.

    I said i could but wanted to hear from the mix
  • so_very_tiredso_very_tired Posts: 701 Part of The Mix Family
    @Nathan, @eylah, @BensonE, @Dancer. For God's sake, take this somewhere else. This thread is about TheMix's new bullshit update, not about you four to get into conflict.
  • eylaheylah Community Connector Posts: 10,487 An Original Mixlorian
    this just shows that when the staff team say it’ll be moderated beforehand it just shows it’ll take bloody ages..
    ppl dont always need advice. sometimes all they rly need is a hand to hold. an ear to listen. and a heart to understand them. 🧸
  • eylaheylah Community Connector Posts: 10,487 An Original Mixlorian
    @Nathan, @eylah, @BensonE, @Dancer. For God's sake, take this somewhere else. This thread is about TheMix's new bullshit update, not about you four to get into conflict.

    chill? im not letting two ppl gang up on my friend and insulting them? wtf
    ppl dont always need advice. sometimes all they rly need is a hand to hold. an ear to listen. and a heart to understand them. 🧸
Sign In or Register to comment.