If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options
What's the point in getting a mortgage?
Former Member
Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
Why are Britons so obsessed with being homeowners, and so many media column inches swamped about getting on the property ladder (or not being able to afford to)? Why not just rent?
Renting is so simple, easy and hassle-free. It's so affordable. Often it can leave you with ample spare money to do things with (typically 30-40% of one's income is spent on rent). And most of all, you're not tied down, you're free to easily move around to different cities / countries.
Getting a mortgage is a hassle. Firstly you need to build up a deposit, typically 10%+ of the house's value. That is a 5 figure sum it takes most people years to save up for. On top of the deposit you need to pay stamp duty which is about £7k for a modest flat. Then when you start the interest repayments on your mortgage can often be more than what you'd pay to rent somewhere, add in the mortgage repayments on top and you often have little money left.
It's more sensible to spend a few hundred quid a month renting (and if you have a family, you can get an entire house for a grand a month at most), and put the leftover cash from income to better use. Invest it in wise instruments - right now a 6% bank account will give more back than putting it in property, when the housing mkt is booming put it in a real estate fund etc.
If you're worried abt the landlord kicking you out when they want, you can sign a long-term contract, there's plenty of places where people have lived renting for decades.
You may say that paying rent is money down the drain, but so are interest repayments which are often much more than rent!
Thoughts?
(And btw, I own a home. And have every penny of my remaining income each month paying off the mortgage, when I just think I could retire paying cheap rent rather than this burden).
Renting is so simple, easy and hassle-free. It's so affordable. Often it can leave you with ample spare money to do things with (typically 30-40% of one's income is spent on rent). And most of all, you're not tied down, you're free to easily move around to different cities / countries.
Getting a mortgage is a hassle. Firstly you need to build up a deposit, typically 10%+ of the house's value. That is a 5 figure sum it takes most people years to save up for. On top of the deposit you need to pay stamp duty which is about £7k for a modest flat. Then when you start the interest repayments on your mortgage can often be more than what you'd pay to rent somewhere, add in the mortgage repayments on top and you often have little money left.
It's more sensible to spend a few hundred quid a month renting (and if you have a family, you can get an entire house for a grand a month at most), and put the leftover cash from income to better use. Invest it in wise instruments - right now a 6% bank account will give more back than putting it in property, when the housing mkt is booming put it in a real estate fund etc.
If you're worried abt the landlord kicking you out when they want, you can sign a long-term contract, there's plenty of places where people have lived renting for decades.
You may say that paying rent is money down the drain, but so are interest repayments which are often much more than rent!
Thoughts?
(And btw, I own a home. And have every penny of my remaining income each month paying off the mortgage, when I just think I could retire paying cheap rent rather than this burden).
0
Comments
Paying for a mortgage (one you can afford, I mean) is much more stable than renting as you don't have to reassess where you live every six or twelve months or so, and the house is yours. You can paint the living room a different colour if you want to, you can have children without having to worry about them being unsettled and moved to a different school or something if you have to move house because the landlord sells the property.
Although in the current environment you are fucking crackers to buy anywhere!
Private landlords will issue assured shorthold tenancy agreements. These provide very few rights to tenants. Once you are outside the fixed period (usually six months) the landlord can evict you with two months notice. He does not have to give a reason and there is no defence to it.
Landlords know this and will generally not offer assured shorthold tenancies for more than 6-12 months and will generally not renew them and create a new fixed period. As a condition of most buy-to-let mortgage agreements they are not allowed to offer tenancies for more than 12 months (certainly Halifax mortgages prohibit this).
Even if you are in the fixed period you are not safe. If your landlord defaults on his mortgage the mortgage lender can have you evicted. Again, there is no defence to this.
If you rent from a housing association you will generally also only be offered an assured shorthold tenancy. Some housing association tenants may have assured or secure tenancies, but generally only if they have already been living in the house for 20 years or more (assured tenancies pretty much died a death following a change in the law in 1989).
The only tenants who have any security of tenure are local authority tenants. Even they have to pass what is known as an "introductory tenancy", where the local authority can terminate the tenancy with one month's notice in the first year. After the first year tenants do have secure tenancies, though.
Needless to say, the waiting list in North Tyneside for a council property is pushing five years for those who have the lowest priority need. Already councils cannot cope with those who are in priority need and waiting lists are only going to get longer.
For you to say that renting is perfectly safe and secure shows an abject ignorance of the law and really quite a scary amount of naivety.
If I could get a secure tenancy I wouldn't be fussed about buying my home. But I can't so I have bought a property. This means that, so long as I pay my mortgage on time, I cannot be evicted on the whim of any other person.
My view on the matter is probably based on how I went from spending a mere £500/wk on rent and having tons of other cash to play with, to now wanting to put several thousand pounds a month, every penny of my income after expenses, towards paying off the mortgage and trying to reduce my interest payments to zero. I never donate money to charity anymore, I'll try and avoid having to buy rounds of drinks etc, as I always think that money could be put towards paying off the mortgage instead. (I have a fully flexible account, interest-only, so pay off whatever I have left each month as a redemption).
As well as this you spend your whole life paying each month and end up with absolutely nothing. Pay for a mortgage and you're not looking at much more a month than renting, but you're getting something for your money.
If you rent for example, you might be paying £600 a month on rent (round here for a small place, for example). If you buy, you might be paying £600 a month on interest (+ mortgage). Now, that mortgage is a sound investment that is likely to go up in value, but if you rent you could take that money that you would invest (and you're still paying your £600 a month 'service' charge whether that's to the bank for loaning you money, or to the landlord for letting you live there), and invest it in something else or even spend some on yourself.
I think in the UK there is a habit of getting a mortgage so your house can be your pension fund in a way. You've heard the expression 'safe as houses' because they never really go down in value long term.
However, with everything else equal - you can withdraw your 'investment' at any time by selling the house, so it's like a bank account anyway in some sense - when you have a landlord you still have the very real prospect of getting fucked over. The amount of people on here who have had things gone wrong and not fixed, who have had their significant deposits withheld because the landlord fancied a holiday, and so on.
I mean, there's issues both ways, a friend's mum's friend bought a property in Spain where there are more rights for tenants, and basically she can't increase the rent (from something laughable like ?150 a month), and she can't sell the property, she has no power to evict the tenants. They're basically getting a house for free.
I agree that in the short term, for example if I was getting a job and living as a batchelor, I'd probably rent then save some money - but long term you want some place to call home where you don't have lots of restrictions on what you can and can't do.
If you look at property though it's vastly overvalued, I'm tempted to just get a caravan, but then there's the issue of where do I send my post...?
:yes: I'd rather pay £1000 a month for something that I'd eventually own than £600 a month dead money
I don't need permission to fix it up, paint the walls, or even worry about whether I will be kicked out for the olympic games (landlords can make a fortune there).
I am about to remortgage on a fixed 3 year deal at 5.x percent. This is 2.x percent lower than I am currently paying.
Oh, and why buy when you can rent: because wouldn't you rather be paying off your OWN mortgage, than somebody elses?
Fantastic answer, answers my question really well, highlight what people see as important. Also shows why I don't care - I've just noticed how shit the windows are here, but I don't care about getting them replaced! Same with pictures which were here when I got here and I've not cared about replacing them, they'll do. Meh, I'm a simple person! Also I suppose I see this place as temporary as I did renting as it's just a pokey flat, want to pay off mortgage asap and get something decent.
Cheers
4 bedroom home in York within commuting distance of York University
To buy:
approx £150k (bit more in reality, but for simplicity's sake), mortgage interest rate (from a quick look) - 7%, repaying over 25 years
Monthly repayment - 1072.63
(Interest only) - 875.00
at 12% it will be - 1593.74
(Interest only) - 1500
So at 7% (that might be wrong, but what I got from a quick search as the APR) you're paying 875 a month dead money - that's just paying the bank for letting them loan you the money. Comparing this to rent...
To rent
house value the same etc.
Monthly cost: £960
and then the rest of your money is freed up to what you like with it. If the bank's interest rate goes up, you're tied into a contract so for the next 6-12 months you're safe at least.
What I'm saying is that in some situations it gives you safety by proxy - it's not your property, if something happens you can up and leave. But on the other hand, if you're going to live somewhere long term, for the safety it affords you may as well get a mortgage.
edit: the rent is taken from the house I'm staying in which is a bit nicer than some of the houses I found actually, they varied from £199k to £149k so I took the lower. It might be misrepresenting the costs.
The only downside to owning, rather than renting, is the bills aspect.
You may be able to negotiate a nice "all inclusive" amount for bills.
own the place, you'll pay lots, and have to stay on top of them.
btw shyboy, what does this bit mean with the different interest rates?
Monthly repayment - 1072.63
(Interest only) - 875.00
at 12% it will be - 1593.74
(Interest only) - 1500
This is unfortunately what may happen to people with the credit crunch and house market crisis.
If you look at that, you're only paying back maybe £200 a month, the vast majority is interest to the bank's profit account.
Yes but when your paying a landlord your paying back nothing, apart from his mortgage of course.
The way i see it, our house costs us around £680 a month in mortgage payments but to rent the same house it's still going to be £550 a month, so whats the extra bit when you can do what the hell you want to your house, and call it your own.
I would have 30 days, and oooh, now you put it like that, of course it's no big deal to uproot yorself on someone else's whim, and no great expense either. /sarcasm
My parents remortgaged their house in the late 1980's to pay for an extension and i'm sure that the repayments at £250 were a significant part of thier montly income but now is hardly anything - compared to thier average mothly income - which though i hate to ask what it is must be somewhere in the region of £8-10K a month after tax.....
Plus thier house is now worth around £500k yet they bought it for only £33K so is a thus a worthwhile long term investment.
For me the mortgage on my house is less a month than it would be to rent it so it makes no sense why i would bother to rent, also its gone up in value so astronomically in the last 4 years that only a devaluation by around 70% would leave me in negative equity...........
What about the £20,000 or whatever deposit it would take most people years to save up for?
When it comes to signing for you have agreed to buy ...the house is worth ten grand less than it was at the time of agreememnt. Haggle haggle haggle comes into it then.
The poor sod who is selling you the house may well have to accept the lower offer ...to enable them to purchase the one they have agreed to buying.
As to your renting on a pension problem, what if you rented, and the £200 or so that would pay off your mortgage you save / invest then when you retire you will have an amount of money to buy a property if you wish to do so.
I'm being a bit of a devil's advocate though, I intend to get a mortgage as soon as I can because the conditions in the UK are suited for house owners, not renters. If the legislation was changed, it might not be the case.... but at the moment you are far better off buying so long as the price differential isn't too massive (bank loan interest vs. rent, both of which is a cost to you and a profit to the other guy, in a mortgage the mortgage repayment bit you could actually count as in investment).
ours was £6000? and we only bought it a month ago - i don't think £6000 is an unreasonable amount to save if theres 2 of you over a couple of years or so. I know a couple of people who have got 100% ones aswell so they didn't need a deposit.
Over the long term, if you have the deposit, buying your own home has to be the best option but the key is to be sure that you can afford the repayments. If you think it might be a stuggle you could consider getting an extra bedroom which you could let out if times were hard. Watch out for dodgy estate agents and tricky sellers, remember if you are a first time buyer you are holding some good negotiating cards.
Are you actually for real?
The "big deal" is that it costs a lot of money to move and by renting you can potentially be moving every six months. My sister-in-law is now in her third rental property in two years because her previous landlords decided to sell up.
Around here the letting agents charge half of one month's rent + VAT as an administration charge. To move a family you'll need to hire removal services, you'll need to find the deposit and advance rent for the new home.
To move between rental properties you'll need to have set aside nearly two grand- £300 removal fees, £300 admin fees, £500 advance rent, £500 bond. Even better still, you'll only get 60 days to do it in.
I have over £40,000 coming into my household and I'd be struggling to find the cash. My sister-in-law and her partner earn about the same yet they had to borrow money from us to pay the bridging costs.
And if you're unlucky, on top of all that, you might have to move your children to a new school.
Moving between rental properties at short notice is not such a big deal if you're 21 and single. It's a huge deal when you're in your 30s and you have two kids to feed.
If we had a European rental market people would rent. In most of Europe rents are fixed and tenants have strong legal protection. Even private tenants in Germany have rights that eclipse those given to council tenants in the UK.
As long as I can afford the repayments, which make up about 1/3 of my salary alone which I can afford by myself without even putting my wife's salary in the equation, then why would I want to rent???