If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options
GPs to "desert" NHS for being made to work for their wages
BillieTheBot
Posts: 8,721 Bot
Story.
GPs, whose average wage often now tops £100,000 a year, are throwing their toys out of the pram because the Government is considering making them have extended surgery opening hours, with the possibility of weekend opening.
I mean, how dare the Government make doctors work for their money? Their wages were practically doubled five years ago, at the same time the responsibility for out-of-hours services were taken away from GPs. And now the Government wants the GPs to do some work for their money they're all going off in a sulk.
It's a real shame that there isn't the manpower to sack these overpaid and underworked whingebags and get someone in who's prepared to work for their exorbitant wages.
Still, the GP's concern for their family life must come as something of a relief to those of us who work all hours of the day to pay for their grossly inflated wages. Traditional opening hours are no longer relevant to society and if GPs want to be paid by society they should muck in. I bet they'd do the extended hours if they were paid by the client.
And before anyone compares GPs to solicitors, etc, the average publicly-funded solicitor earns about £35,000pa- about 1/3 of that earned by a GP).
GPs, whose average wage often now tops £100,000 a year, are throwing their toys out of the pram because the Government is considering making them have extended surgery opening hours, with the possibility of weekend opening.
I mean, how dare the Government make doctors work for their money? Their wages were practically doubled five years ago, at the same time the responsibility for out-of-hours services were taken away from GPs. And now the Government wants the GPs to do some work for their money they're all going off in a sulk.
It's a real shame that there isn't the manpower to sack these overpaid and underworked whingebags and get someone in who's prepared to work for their exorbitant wages.
Still, the GP's concern for their family life must come as something of a relief to those of us who work all hours of the day to pay for their grossly inflated wages. Traditional opening hours are no longer relevant to society and if GPs want to be paid by society they should muck in. I bet they'd do the extended hours if they were paid by the client.
And before anyone compares GPs to solicitors, etc, the average publicly-funded solicitor earns about £35,000pa- about 1/3 of that earned by a GP).
Beep boop. I'm a bot.
0
Comments
I could never be a doctor (not clever enough) and one of the reasons would be the lack of time for yourself and your family.
I think if the government's determined to do extended hours at weekends & evenings, they should give the doctors less pay & give them time off in the week instead.
For the last few months, I've been temping, which means if I don't go into work, I don't get paid. In order to get a doctors appointment, I've had to take a whole afternoon off work. There does need to be more consideration for people who work full time.
I do find it hard to have sympathy for people who earn so much.
I don't have a problem with people who earn so much per se (they worked and studied awfully hard to get there), but I do think that doctors ought to rota themselves over weekends. The NHS Walk-In Centres are not quite the same as seeing your doc.
I agree.
Rota-ing them seems so much more sensible considering that all other health workers have to do weekends too and get paid a hell of a lot less for it
The walk in centres are ok but aren't they only staffed by nurses, and you can't get appointments, you just have to wait.
If GPs do "desert" the NHS, as Kermit puts it, I have a simple and practical solution. We import doctors from Poland. They will happily work for around a quarter of the £100k that GPs demand, they'll work longer hours and they'll have no qualms about working six days a week. Even so, that's pathetic, frankly. Firstly, most banks aren't open on Saturdays at all. Banks still seem to exist in a 9-5 world when society has long moved away from that. If Tesco only opened from 9.00am - 4.30pm, Monday to Friday, they'd soon go out of business. The moment that banks open 12 hours a day, 6 days per week, I'll be happy.
And if you seriously think doctors from Poland would work for 25K while English doctors get more, you're crazy.
Well it's a bit of a waste of taxpayer's money if they don't get a job with the NHS.. Studying medicine takes a long time and costs a massive amount of money. Medicine - more than any other discipline is hugely subsidised. (Top-up fees nowhere near cover the actual cost). If they go abroad the NHS and the public don't benefit.
Poland needs doctors too. Polish doctors who wanted to move to Britain are probably already here anyway. 'Importing' people from Poland is not a solution to anything. Poles have come here and some will stay permanently but a lot won't. Some are here just to make some quick money... As opportunities increase in Poland a lot of people will go back. People have their ties and Poland is a nice country, it's not a basket-case... Medicine is oversubscribed, there is no shortage of British students willing to pursue a career in medicine. Long term, 'importing' people from abroad is absolutely unnecessary.
Um will they? So we should just get whoever we can to do the job who will do it for the lowest salary and will work the longest hours? Show some respect for the existing, well-trained and hard-working GPs that we have... (For the record I think doctor's surgeries should all offer a basic service for emergencies at weekends... and some evening services for people who work. With a bit of compromise I'm sure this could be achieved without resorting to 'importing' doctors from abroad.
:rolleyes: And if banks open 12 hours a day, 6 days per week it'll cost an enormous amount of money... And we'll all pay for it in the form of higher fees and charges/interest rates/etc. In most countries 'free' banking doesn't exist, overseas banks charge their customers for cheques, maintaining a current account, withdrawals over the counter, etc.
In most of Europe you won't see any supermarket open 24 hours and you won't see supermarkets open on Sunday. Carrefour which don't open on Sunday's are bigger than Tesco. Tesco and the other big supermarkets here would not go bankrupt if they scrapped 24 hour opening and closed on Sunday's. Broadly speaking regardless of how long supermarkets are open people buy the same amount of stuff - longer opening doesn't make us need to buy more milk, more meat, more fruit, etc. I'm quite sure that for what it costs supermarkets to open longer, ridiculously long opening hours don't make sense... But the supermarket business is so cutthroat they all want an edge over each other and longer hours was one route the supermarkets went down - and now we've got it, they won't go back. It's us that pay though - do a big shop in a German or a French supermarket and it's a lot cheaper than it is over here... Long opening hours, Sunday opening (paying staff Sunday premium) etc costs money and we pay in the form of higher prices....
If everybody else in Europe can survive without going to the supermarket on one day a week and can cope with not being able to buy junk food at 3am I think we can. Our obsession with 'convenience' is one of the reasons we have higher prices.
:yes: It costs £250,000 to train each person. There are about 340 people in my year group alone...
The last pay settlement with GPs was astronomical, and the rest of the NHS is going to be paying for it for a long long time. Northumberland at one point had one out-of-hours GP; the county covers about 700 square miles. Even now the out-of-hours service is based in Newcastle, which is a good 90 minute drive to the top of the county.
Rather than appreciate that doctors are paid a lot of money to provide a service, the BMA seem to expect the taxpayer to cough up ever bigger amounts of money with less and less in return. Working until 7pm a couple of nights a week isn't going to kill them; I have to do it as part of my government contract and I don't get paid a six-figure salary to do it.
This is all about the Govt trying to cover up the fact that they fucked up the GP contract. They had no real understanding what GPs actually did, in terms of hours and services provided, they had no concept of how much it would cost to provide OOH services and, ever since the GPs started to make the most of their new contract, the Govt have mounted a scurrilous smear campaign to try and turn of patient satisfaction rates wit htheir GPs (which currently runs in the high 80% area). The way that GPs maximise dtheir income was to provide improved services in their practice - they have to now achieve a large number of quality measures which include screening for risk factors in heart disease, dementia, diabetics, asthma sufferes plus many others and then treat patients in line with "best practice". They aren't get money for just doing the same old same old.
I have yet to meet a GP who works "normal" hours like the majority of the public. If you ignore the fact that many practices already open 8.30-6.30, ignore the fact that GPs will have morning sessions and afternoon/evening sessions, ignore the number of home vists, coroners reports, death certifications, hospitals vists etc then it might be possible to argue that they don't work hard enough.
Of course, that is missing the number of other services they offer which prevent people from having to attend hospital for appointments (things like minor surgery, dermatology, cardiology, endoscoies etc)...
This year the Govt have said that they want GPs to open for an extra 30 mins per week for every 1000 patients registered with the practice. For that the practice will get an additional 1.5% increase in income.
You might note that MPs have already voted themselves a payrise greater than that.
You might also want to note that I am talking about 1.5% increase for the practoce and not the GP salary. Out of that the practice will have increased costs (overheads for opening longer hours) plus natural inflation costs and of course increase wages for the staff which they employ.
As an aside "people who pay their wages" - that would be themselves then, they are taxpayers too.
Yes. On Monday (not the one just gone; the one before) I phoned up to make an appointment and had to wait until Friday to be seen as it wasn't an emergency. Also, last year, I had to wait a week to be seen as well. (although I was away for 3 days within that week)
Now they have 0845 numbers, once I spent £10 of phone credit trying to book an emergency appointment.
They would be if they still provided OOH services.
But they don't.
Nah, its more about trying to rectify the mistake. The mistake was cutting doctors work by about 1/3 and giving them a payrise of about 50%.
If doctors are going go to earn salaries that puts them in the top 1% of earners then they should have to work for the money. The OOH service is a disaster purely because all GPs opted-out of the system.
I blame the GPs for taking the cash without putting the work in. But I blame the Government more for letting them.
But that isn't the point. The point is that now the Government are trying to reset the balance the BMA throw their toys out of the pram. Let them walk away from the NHS, but make them pay back every single penny of subsidy they received before they do.
Aye, I did notice that.
They're a set of cunts who want hanging. But then we all knew that anyway.
But back to the topic at hand... have I ever found it difficult to see my GP? Oh god yes. The staff at the local surgery arrive at around 8.45am, and I have to make sure I call them at that exact time. Appointments get taken up very quickly. If I call after 9.30am, (on an 0845 number too, if you please) I get told there are no more spaces that day and to call back tomorrow.
Do you realise that the level of pay GPs get is related to the services they offer?
So the high earning practises (who have to cover their practise costs) will be the ones providing out of hours services, and hitting all the performance targets and providing additional services. This pushes the average pay up, and the ones who no longer provide out of hours services aren't getting as much money.
Except that isn't what happened.
before the contract GPs got paid a fixed amount per patient on their list, now they get pad less per patient and the rest is performance related (including access), so if they don't perform then they don't earn.
Again, that funding actually goes into the practice and not the GP, so from that income they have to pay staff and overheads etc. To date the value of the contractual payments has not risen in line with inflation, in fact last year there was no increase at all - yet all the costs of providing services increased.
This year's negotiation is just an extension of the same apporach of clawing back based on a fuck up.
Problem is that the Govt didn;t understand that people will perform better if you financially incentivise them and so come unstuck, not budgetting enough. To take attention away from that we've had a smear campaign, for which you have fallen hook line and sinker.
Interesting how opning times weren't an issue until after the first year of the contract, isn't it?
It's a disaster because the Govt only reduced GP income by a small amount so many more opted out that perhaps would have done. It's a disaster because for year GPs were expected to offer the services for no additional pay. It's a disaster because staying up all night so that you can see little Johnny wh ocoughed last week just demoralises someone, especially when you can give it up and not lose much income. It's a disaster because when GPs did opt out the Govt didn't actually put enough monney into re-provision of these services.
They won't, it's an empty threat.
What will happen though is that they will stop doing all those things which they currently do and for which they are not paid as part of their contract. It's still a huge amount, it will affect the NHS and it will cause the Govt to back down.
Just as their did to deliver the contract in the first place.
I think I have before...
Taking trained nurses and doctors from third world countries that paid for their training is a disgusting practice...
0845 numbers are local rate. If it's urgent your GP will see you the same day. If it's not urgent I don't think it's outrageous that you call back the next day. In my experience, if I call at 9am I can normally get a same-day appointment. I think that's pretty good tbh...
The local council and the practise I go to have just built a brand new surgery as well, the old one was far too small and unsuitable. More GPs, more practise nurses and more treatment avaiable, worth every penny.
Normally half the day is appointments and the other half is reserved for 'drop in' stuff.
My doctor is quite good that if you ring him he will come out to you, has done on more than one occasion.
Thing with doctors in general is it's hard to judge because not many of us are doctors. From my experience, professionally they're pretty good but not usually as friendly as joe bloggs i.e. see you as a customer rather than a human being with feelings. Never catch one hugging ya .
Second is that there is an air of eliteness, superiority. When I decribed my symptoms to my GP he asked me what he thought it was, I said I dunno could be diabetes and he checked me over for diabetes and said I was ok, but I shouldn't diagnose myself. He asked me too! :rolleyes:
(and the only reason I said diabetes was because I made a thread here saying 'I have xxx what should i do' and someone said 'could be diabetes get it checked out')
He loves telling me I'm wrong .
I think he gets paid exceptionally well, a few years ago when it was just him it was £300K for him, his staffing, premises whatnot and the other bits they need, per year. Has a new Jag every year . He's got another doctor working there now though so I don't know what his take home is.
Just thought i'd throw this in on the whole problems seeing your GP thing
An interesting issue. What you had there was a Govt wary because of how they fucked up and a group of professional who got greedy because they expected to get as good a deal as the GPs did, without realising that they didn't have the same level of support from the public (remember the GP contract was in part a reaction to poor recruitment and public clamour that "something must be done"), that they don't offer the same plethora of "other" services and that, actually, the new contract isn't a bad as they would like the public to believe.
Problem with dentists is that they seem to expect the NHS to pay the same rate as their private patients do.
Biggest problem with the new Dental contract is the way it screws over the public. It forces dentists to either try and cram all NHS work into less appointments than they need to do it (because they are on a quota limit of how many NHS units they can claim a year), to only take on a certain kind of NHS patient (the easy ones that don't pay charges) so that they can provide a complete course of treatment to them without running out of units that they can claim for, or to just give up on NHS entirely and decide that it's far simpler to run the practise their way and write treatment plans based on what's needed all year round rather than being restricted as to what they can do in the last 4 months of the year because they are running out of NHS units. It's also pushing more complex NHS work out of high street surgerys and into Community which is a far more expensive way to do it, and the referrals are going through because it's not economic for high street dentists to do the work on the NHS.
/Side track onto Dentistry
At the moment there's no restriction on what the GPs can do, and how many of the extra services they can provide, or targets they can hit. This means the good ones that go for it body and soul are getting very high practise incomes.
What very few people seem to have linked up yet is that it's the good GPs who are getting the high salaries. The ones who take a fortnight to give you your appointment aren't hitting their targets and thus won't be getting the renumeration for doing so.
Because of the sheer greed of dentists a lot of poor people are faced with a choice of paying upwards of one hundred nicker to have a tooth extracted, or doing it themselves with a doorframe. £100 is truly affordable for someone on income support, isn't it?
I have no problem with GP pay per se. I agree that GPs should be paid for the work they do- the lack of extra funding for OOH services was a disgrace. But the lack of a "real terms" payrise for the last 18 months (following a huge payrise) doesn't make my heart bleed. A comparative professional, such as a criminal defence lawyer, hasn't had any sort of payrise since 1994, so GPs are doing very well from the public purse compared to their graduate peers.
But the pendulum has now swung too far the other way. GPs have taken the cash and walked away from OOH services. It is now impossible to see an OOH doctor in most of Northumberland because all the local doctors have taken the gigantic pay rise without putting anything back in to society. As a result the OOH service is based two hours away from where people live.
If doctors want to take the extra money they should put the extra hours in. They should have the funding pulled unless they pull their weight in the OOH services. I fail to see why anyone is against this, except GPs who will have to do some work for their payrise now.
I don't care how good the "service" now is during the day, the simple fact remains is that OOH provision is a shambles at the same time that GPs are taking ever-increasing sums out of the NHS. They're being renumerated for a service they are simply not providing. A service they should be providing.