If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
Ever been to France? They drive like nutters over there, God knows how time me or my mum nearly got knocked over on holiday.
I've all but given up trying to learn at the moment, after five fails, and a grand later, its just not worth it when I wouldnt use it to get to work anyway.
See i think you've benefited from actually going out and driving. Though i don't think learners are allowed on the motorways! Actually getting experience spending time behind the wheel, regardless of whether it's with an instructor. I think i had about 20ish hours of actual lessons but i was always going out with my mum, occasionally on some long-ish drives on roads i didn't know. I think it counts for a lot how much you do beyond your lessons.
Driving lessons teach you how to pass the driving test i think anyway. Who honestly drives like they did in their test?
As for the cost of driving now, I don't have a source but it's relatively more expensive now than for a long time (as in, proportionally to your income). I *think* the 70s were the cheapest, but since then it's just gone up. Also, driving at night and on the motorways, I don't think it's all that different to in the day / on other roads. Adjust your driving for the conditions etc.
I passed after only 12 I think, though I had driving experience already.
Driving at night is definitely different to driving in the daytime. Doesn't take you long to get into it, but I think for people who learn with an instructor and don't get a chance to go out with anyone else (so they don't get a chance to try out driving at night) are at a disadvantage for not having had the experience. Motorways aren't particularly different from dual carriageways, but again not everyone gets the chance to practise on them before they take their test. Dual carriageway driving practice should be compulsory, but motorways are just that little bit faster and I don't really see a reason to lift the ban on learner drivers - or to force people to take pass plus.
Worry not, it was just after I'd passed.
I did night driving and dual carriageways after about 10 lessons....
If you can pass the test then you can drive on the road, nothing left for an instructor to teach you. The only thing thats going to go wrong is where you slip up from lack of experience. But you should just as well have that with your parents or on your own rather than paying £24 an hour (AA hourly charge in Leicester).
Agreed on the Pass Plus, but perhaps a cut down version of it, because I'm not sure it's practical. If you live in North West Wales, it's quite a trek to the nearest motorway. And I don't know about anyone else, but when I did mine, there was a 1 month waiting list for a test. Imagine if everyone that was doing their test also had to do a full day course. I know you don't need an examiner for the Pass Plus, but I would guess you'd be risking a shortage of instructors.
I think 40 lessons is still a bit excessive myself, but perhaps, if you have to take into account the person that takes the longest to learn. Personally, I think more of a problem is learning a new car after you've passed your test. When I was learning, my instructor got a new car, and I was making a lot of mistakes in the first few lessons in the new car, that I didn't make previously, just as I was getting used to it. I think a lot of people tend to have crashes soon after they pass, not because they are not up to the standard required, but because they aren't as careful as they should be as they get used to not having someone next to them, along with a new car, which is often not going to be as good as the one they've learned in. I think a lot of the battle is somehow getting people to take it easy in the first few months after their test. There's already the 6 points and you're banned thing in place, which I think is good, but I can't think of anything off the tp of my head that would make people be more careful (and you'd think they'd be more careful in their own car than their instructors really, because they have to pay if it breaks).
A minimum number of hours of professional lessons I'm less sure about, plenty of people don't need them, plenty of people need a lot lot more than any limit could prescribe.
I spent a year as a learner, my brother spent about 6 months and my parents, our accident records, our instructor, pretty much everyone agrees I'm the better driver because I got so much experience under supervision, and was more mature when I passed. Maybe keep the age to learn at 17 but take the age for a full license up to 18.
Where is it your from?
Right now, you need 18 hours of driving before you are allowed to the exam. there are exceptions tho.
If you have someone who drove for about 5 or 6 years (verifiable) [in my case, my father], and you let the car have a check-up in a car repair shop, you only need 4 mandatory hours of driving in the driving school and you can do the rest in your private car without driving instructor, just your father (for example). It was pretty cool, because my father has a car that's easier to drive than ... dunno, it almost drives for itself.
So I could even drive that private car for the practical examination.
because I did ALL 18 hours AND the private driving thingy, and failed the theoretical exam 2 times , it costed me around 2000€ :crying: , which was and still is a lot for me.
the private driving thingy costs 50€ ONCE! and you are allowed to drive until judgement day before your exam (a double-hour 2x45 minutes costs 73€ in the morning -> cheapest), so it was a really good option.
Well the test seems that it will be getting harder.
I have my 3rd testing coming up very soon now the other 2 test's i failed the first for not using a bus lane and the 2nd a car pulled out on me, and i had to swerve to avoid the car and i got a serious for steering. So close, i will pass my 3rd test i aint going through any of these bazzar idea's of all these extra hours of driving.
The pressure is on. Big Time - I'll never givin no matter what.
However, I do agree with the staggered testing.
Quite a few friends of mine passed in under 20 lessons within a couple of months and then ended up smashing up their cars because the season changed and they weren't used to the differing road conditions.
One had passed her test but wouldn't drive in the rain because she never had in a lesson and was scared!
I think you should have to learn over a certain period of time, and that your instructor should sign off when he/she is happy that you are compentant in that skill in that condition.
The actual test is a lottery. The 14 minors rule is ridiculous, as is the failing on manovuers.
I passed fifth time, but never once got more than 2 minors for my driving, one examiner even said my driving was damn near perfect. But I panicked on the manovuers and made silly but not dangerous mistakes (slightly too wide on a reverse round a corner - that sort of thing).
I definitely agree with the US method of the ten year re-test too.