If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
That sounds remarkably like Tony Blair, lets move on, the Iraq war and the reasons for it? Oh thats history, lets move forward, the shooting of an innocent man because he had 'mongolian eyes'? lets move on, nothing to see here.
We are fighting terrorists, they are very similar to the terrorists we've had for ages.
They did not belong to any terrorist organisation. Unless you have some evidence that the police and the secret services are not aware of.
If so, you'd better tell them.
What a load of bollocks.
I wonder if you would use the same excuse about any other incident.
Justice hasn't got an expiration date.
Any specific incidents you'd like to mentuion>
Don't you think you would have heard and read all about it if those people belonged to any terrorist organisation? :rolleyes:
If you were mugged or burgled a year ago and the police caught the criminal today, would you agree if the police said 'look mate, it's been a year, what's the point in prosecuting, better move on'?
Like fuck you would.
Why do you think that is "their" job ?
Who gave them that job ?
Have you seen the contract of employment ?
I`d love to see those "facts"
Ah yes, that famous islamic fundamentalist de menzes. Such a shame he wasn't either, eh poppet?
So why didn't they do it?
they cocked up the surveillance, they let him ride round London on a bus, and then only shot him when he was nice and toasty on the tube.
If he was such a credible threat, why wasn't he shot on his doorstep?
If you believe the bullshit that they thought him a serious terrorist then the police were negligent, putting the lives of hundreds at risk. If you don't believe the bullshite then the police were negligent, for shooting a man in the head when he had done nothing wrong.
Even if they're not, the bottom line is they attacked this country based on the principles of a Islamist terrorist organisation. No I wouldn't but it's hard to give a similarity because they are completely different cases.
It is to protect the public. The government.
EH? What has this got to do with anything???
What facts??
If you know any different, go to the police and tell them.
No they aren't. Justice is justice.
it is the fact the met as a whole cant work properly to save someones life in regards to good intelligence and acting on it properly
The BIG difference with this story is it was
a) The police that cocked up
b) It was the BRITISH police that cocked up and shot an innocent man
When I travel the world every single country I visit the police all have guns, people from around the world respect the fact the UK cops don't carry them, it means a lot and loads of people from all over the world respect the British Police force.
So when they bsaically assassinate an innocent member of the public it sends shockwaves.
And when they send 250 cops to arrest two innocent men, shooting one of them in their own home at night it send ripples around the world
One of the chaps that they arrested went a few days earlier to atcually try to become a community officier - where was the police intelligence dept to tell them things like that?
We would all like thins to settle down but when there's cover-ups and further cock-ups the police keep the story alive themselves.
Part of their job should have been to connect their eyes to their brains (assuming they had any).
At the end of the day no controller in a room miles away can see what the person infront of them looks like, if they have big bac pack with them or heavy jacket.
I'm sure they've even said their radios didn't work under ground.
The police have achieved nothing, now suicide bombers will just use the dead man's handle method to let off a bomb.
He wasnt even Irish, he was Scottish and the person phoning in the 'threat' got it wrong.