If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options
The immigration debate
Former Member
Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
0
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
Luckily immigration provides both immediate and future workforce to keep the country running.
Problem solved. Off to the pub.
From the article UKIP comment:
Tbh I don’t think the government is that patronising. Anyway recent Polish immigrants for instance who settle here permanently and have children and bring them up here will effectively lose any immigrant connotations in a generation. Next generation Poles will simply be seen as British, if the children go to school here they won’t be seen as any different to any other British children. That’s pretty much affirmed by the many people in Britain and the States with Polish ancestry but not really any distinct Polish-British or Polish-American identity. It’s an unfortunate and uncomfortable fact but the risk of tensions among ‘immigrant’ groups in society does not imo come from Poles, there is no minority among Poles here that insist on forced marriages, ‘honour killings’ or fatwa’s against authors or cartoonists. Unfortunately the minority of other communities that do insist on such incompatibilities with our civilised society tarnish the majority.
It does make sense however to have restrictions on immigration and there is nothing racist or xenophobic about that. As Frank Field says unlimited legal immigration through the EU or unchecked illegal immigration might not be sustainable and while we do need skilled immigrants there is no reason why they cannot be found through a legal visa guest worker programme (with subsequent opportunities for permanent residence, etc) as opposed to a potentially dangerous open-door policy.
No, he isn't.
edit: by the former i mean whether how long before people get fed up with it?
This article continues that trend.......
economically the UK needs immigrants, but it should be properly regulated so numbers are correct.
Erm, we need immigration, or our Economy will be fucked and there will be such an imbalance between old/young people as that we couldn't support all the old folk who are retired...
We already see this problem with the retirment age being raised.
Touche
Reading the article in full it is actually difficult to see what point he is making.
He seems to be saying that the BNP are actually right and that people just haven't noticed yet.
But again the 'problem' with immigration is attributed it seems to some vague bollocks about 'social cohesion' and 'British values' all of which is manifestly stupid (this guy is meant to be clever?!)
What these arguments always semm to miss is that Britian has had immigration on a considerable scale for years so saying 'xxx bad thing will happen if we don't control immigration' is always bollocks because it already would have happened years ago.
is British culture, social cohesion etc etc now 'worse' than it was 50 years ago and is this because of immigration since then? If you can prove that then he may have a point but this is obviously wrong.
What the government ought to be doing instead of pandering to stupidiy, racism and xenophobia is to make the positive case for immigration and try and change some of the entrenched attitudes of the British public.......
Plus polish beer and sausage are fantastic!
True.
I have even found the immigrant builders and workers seem to actually do more work and work longer hours! Often I see British ones sitting about doing naff all.
Indeed. Although it should not be unchecked. My friend's dad runs a building firm and said how a lot of other building firms employ some Poles who don't even speak English, it's quite obviously dangerous to work on a building site if you don't speak English.
I've came across waiters in London from Eastern Europe that don't speak English, some of the people stacking shelves at night in the local Tesco barely speak any English - there is nothing racist about having controlled immigration where preference is given to people working in areas that we need and to people who speak English. It's a somewhat debatable claim but I know too of builders moving to Spain - and their explanation for doing so is that the influx of cheap labour from Eastern Europe has meant labour costs have got lower, hurting British builders and that they can't make a decent living with other building firms that charge lower costs through relying on Poles who they pay less. So these builders moving to Spain from what I know move to Spain where living costs are lower and then come back to Britain for a few months at a time to work. Although tbh I think part of that is sour grapes in that Polish builders are doing an equivalent, if not better job for less pay...
Hell, I am tempted to do it myself, even though I'm not a builder.
Yes but these days the people running the show know Polish and English. He gets the instructions from boss and tells the poles what to do in Polish. Harmeless enough.
Yup. And anyone who supports the capitalist system has to accept this - thats how it works. The guy who does a good job for the lowest pay gets the deal. Thats how the Free Hand of the Economy works. It's our own method coming back to bite us... thing is... half these people support their family at home on the wages, send half back home, live over here on the other half - and that little bit can support their whole family back home!
It's shocking to think the cost of living in Britain is that much!
Btw, I counter you av with a Stalin!
And who is to decide that exactly? I assume you mean the govt?
As someone who supposedly supports free-markets in most cases and realises that the state is often an inappropriate and unnecessary presence in many human affairs what is your justification for imposing soviet-style market controls on the international labour market?
So you think any control whatsoever on immigration is an unwanted 'soviet-style market control on the international labour market'?
This thread is about immigration so I'm not going to talk about my views on other matters. I'm not anti-immigration.
I don't buy into spurious claims of unskilled illegal immigrants being of enormous benefit or of unlimited legal immigration from Eastern Europe being somehow necessary for the country. There is absolutely no reason why skills shortages cannot be filled through specific visa programmes. And the idea that Britain needs immigrants to pay for pensions is a bit of a flawed argument.
Your refusal to talk about other issues is just a way to avoid your hypocrisy but don't worry as it would seem every other supposed beleiver in free markets wants tight controls on the international labour markets and i have never seen a good reason given which leaves them open to suspicion with regards to their motives.
If I replaced labour with anyother good that is purchased on a market and suggested the kind of controls that you suggest than you would be against it on grounds of freedom, and on liberal economic principles.
So tell me why is the labour market different?