Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options

infiltration...

13

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    UN isn't really a police force, as they have no military of their own, only military volunteered by member nations. NATO is more the police force, but then again that is actually an american/British controlled organisation set up to oppose the USSR.

    The world really does need its own police force...
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    subject13 wrote:
    The world really does need its own police force...
    the world needs less force.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    subject13 wrote:

    The world really does need its own police force...

    fuck yeah

    Team_America__World_164466c.jpg
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Love that film...Id love to see the film "Team France: World Police" all about a group of puppets that run away from every fight...
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    hahaha Nice one.

    The UN isn't a proper, full legal body though is it? So it can't be the police and everyone saying its the UN says so that goes is crap. Countries do what they want. The UN is a talking shop where countries can argee or disagree to soemthing about some1 else in the world.

    its not the be all and end all.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Back to the issue of Palestinian land...

    This illustrates the situation pretty well...


    palestinianlandloss0ez.jpg


    And some wonder why people resent this...
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    And why did the Isralli's get land???

    oh yeah, it was there land and that little thing called the Holocaust of course.

    And the Israllies are so out of line, that government of theirs, so against the palestinians. I mean its not like I have seen the Israelli's diposing their own people form houses by force and using the army ont heir own people to make sure the palestinians get their land its it?

    oh wait they are...
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    The Jews were the conquering force, they took the land, its the same as a thousand other cases through history. In 200 years this will be just another example of such things.

    Although by the looks of them pictures, there wont be any Palestine at all in a few years!
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Ecept they are getting their land back now and if you look on the maps up there, the last one is 6 years out of date....
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Walkindude wrote:
    And why did the Isralli's get land???

    oh yeah, it was there land and that little thing called the Holocaust of course.
    Was that the fault of the Palestinians was it? :confused:
    And the Israllies are so out of line, that government of theirs, so against the palestinians. I mean its not like I have seen the Israelli's diposing their own people form houses by force and using the army ont heir own people to make sure the palestinians get their land its it?

    oh wait they are...
    LOL... are you really that gullible? At the same time as they evacuate settlements that housed 5,000 people in Gaza, they're stealing yet more land and approving the building of settlements for 10 times as many people in the West Bank.

    Look at the map again. Carefully.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Walkindude wrote:
    Ecept they are getting their land back now and if you look on the maps up there, the last one is 6 years out of date....
    No they're not. Gaza is but a very small fraction of land compared with the West Bank. And Israel doesn't want to return the West Bank. In fact they're extending their tumour-like settlements as we speak:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4560550.stm
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Well, when that map reaches is final conclusion and there is no more Palestine at all, then there will be no more debate or argument will there...something to think about.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I think there would be... at the end of the day Israel was created out of thin air. Even if Palestine was to be completely eaten up, who's to say it's not going 'to do an Israel' in the future and pop out of nowhere? ;)

    Anyways, the conflict could have ended many years ago. All it needs to happen is for Israel to return to map no. 3.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    Where would you have sent the 7/7 bombers "home" to? Leeds?
    True...

    I don't think it's a simple as sending people 'home'. The problems are far deeper than it simply being an 'evil darkie'... Maybe we should deport all anti-capitalists, trade unionists, animal rights protesters and so on because they're all a danger to our peaceful and just society.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Aladdin, the map is out of date. It says 2000 on the last one, its 2006 now mate, 6 years ahead of that last map.

    So a whole people recieve on of if not th emost horrifc genocidal acts in the history of mankind, a people killed for who they were, tortured and killed in a "final solution" and they don't deserev a country of their own??
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    The only difference today is that the Gaza strip is in Palestinian hands.

    The West Bank, however, remains as desolated, fragmented wasteland as before. Worse, in fact. Between the extra land stolen by the erection of the Apartheid-Nazi Wall and the ever increasing settlements, the Palestinians have even less land there than they did in that map 6 years ago.

    Let me know if you cannot picture it in your head, and I'll find a map for you.

    As for whether the Jewish people deserved a country, that does not mean that you have to steal it from somebody else first, does it? Why didn't Britain voluntarily gave their land away for the creation of Israel? Why didn't the US donate a State for that cause?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Or better, provide a portion of Germany who were the ones guilty of the atrocity for which apologists continue to justify more than half a century of Zionisms own brand of particularist bigotted atrocity against Palestinians.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Walkindude wrote:
    So a whole people recieve on of if not th emost horrifc genocidal acts in the history of mankind, a people killed for who they were, tortured and killed in a "final solution" and they don't deserev a country of their own??

    Maybe but as you can see by the diagrams...they took more than they needed.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Britain did give their land for the Jews, it was called Palestine, we had it prior to world war 2 after all.

    Nah, return to map no.3? that wouldnt solve anything, the palestinians would want way more.

    Also it is NOT a Nazi-Wall, it is a Wall...thats what the Communists/Soviets did! Nazis, build Huge death camps!
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Its very much akin to South African buntustans and if you think it justifiable and have any consistency of principle at all then you must also suggest that Apartheid was justifiable.

    As for your argument about Palestine being "British land", it was not. it was British occupied and administered but very much rightfully and legally owned by those who inhabited it. This fact was no less true when the Ottoman's ran the region as even their empire, for all its brutality, recognised legal land ownership.

    Israel was born of pre-planned, pre-connived ethnic clearances by the Zionist leaders and their manipulative alliances with the colonial powers of the era. All with complete intentional disregard for the aspirations of those who had long resided their in peace by those who already had their own citizenships and homelands elsewhere in Europe and the US.

    Letus also not forget that Britain promised the Palestinian Arabs their own independence and nationhood for their aid against the Ottomans who were allied with Austria-Hungary and Germany during WWI. This promise was what was empirically known by the Palestinians to have been utterly betrayed by the Balfour Declaration promising land to those who never had any legitimate claim other than a colonialist one in keeping with the political dynamics of that era (which most critically minded persons should decry no less than any other grasping expansionist miliatrism of that day).

    exerpted from "The Origins of the Palestine-Israel Conflict" (published by Jews for Justice in the Middle East)...

    The British Mandate Period
    1920-1948


    The Balfour Declaration promises a Jewish Homeland in Palestine.

    "The Balfour Declaration, made in November 1917 by the British Government...was made a) by a European power, b) about a non-European territory, c) in flat disregard of both the presence and wishes of the native majority resident in that territory...[As Balfour himself wrote in 1919], 'The contradiction between the letter of the Covenant (the Anglo French Declaration of 1918 promising the Arabs of the former Ottoman colonies that as a reward for supporting the Allies they could have their independence) is even more flagrant in the case of the independent nation of Palestine than in that of the independent nation of Syria. For in Palestine we do not propose even to go through the form of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants of the country...The four powers are committed to Zionism and Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad, is rooted in age-long tradition, in present needs, in future hopes, of far profounder import than the desire and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land,'" Edward Said, "The Question of Palestine."

    Wasn't Palestine a wasteland before the Jews started immigrating there?

    "Britain's high commissioner for Palestine, John Chancellor, recommended total suspension of Jewish immigration and land purchase to protect Arab agriculture. He said 'all cultivable land was occupied; that no cultivable land now in possession of the indigenous population could be sold to Jews without creating a class of landless Arab cultivators'...The Colonial Office rejected the recommendation." John Quigley, "Palestine and Israel: A Challenge to Justice."

    Were the early Zionists planning on living side by side with Arabs?

    In 1919, the American King-Crane Commission spent six weeks in Syria and Palestine, interviewing delegations and reading petitions. Their report stated, "The commissioners began their study of Zionism with minds predisposed in its favor...The fact came out repeatedly in the Commission's conferences with Jewish representatives that the Zionists looked forward to a practically complete dispossession of the present non-Jewish inhabitants of Palestine, by various forms of purchase...

    "If [the] principle [of self-determination] is to rule, and so the wishes of Palestine's population are to be decisive as to what is to be done with Palestine, then it is to be remembered that the non-Jewish population of Palestine - nearly nine-tenths of the whole - are emphatically against the entire Zionist program.. To subject a people so minded to unlimited Jewish immigration, and to steady financial and social pressure to surrender the land, would be a gross violation of the principle just quoted...No British officers, consulted by the Commissioners, believed that the Zionist program could be carried out except by force of arms.The officers generally thought that a force of not less than fifty thousand soldiers would be required even to initiate the program. That of itself is evidence of a strong sense of the injustice of the Zionist program...The initial claim, often submitted by Zionist representatives, that they have a 'right' to Palestine based on occupation of two thousand years ago, can barely be seriously considered." Quoted in "The Israel-Arab Reader" ed. Laquer and Rubin.

    Side by side - continued

    "Zionist land policy was incorporated in the Constitution of the Jewish Agency for Palestine...'land is to be acquired as Jewish property and..the title to the lands acquired is to be taken in the name of the Jewish National Fund, to the end that the same shall be held as the inalienable property of the Jewish people.' The provision goes to stipulate that 'the Agency shall promote agricultural colonization based on Jewish labor'...The effect of this Zionist colonization policy on the Arabs was that land acquired by Jews became extra-territorialized. It ceased to be land from which the Arabs could ever hope to gain any advantage...

    "The Zionists made no secret of their intentions, for as early as 1921, Dr. Eder, a member of the Zionist Commission, boldly told the Court of Inquiry, 'there can be only one National Home in Palestine, and that a Jewish one, and no equality in the partnership between Jews and Arabs, but a Jewish preponderance as soon as the numbers of the race are sufficiently increased.' He then asked that only Jews should be allowed to bear arms." Sami Hadawi, "Bitter Harvest."

    Full Text of "Origins of the Palestine-Israel Conflict" (taken from section: The British Mandate Period) for a starting primer on the issue

    Essentially one must ask themselves how they would rightfully react if foreign powers decided that their towns, counties, states would be simply contracted away to the claim of possession by those who never had even set foot in that land prior to their militaristic campaign efforts to secure it for themselves. To say one group may do this to another because they possess some unassailable exceptionalist status that no other humans should enjoy, let alone basic respect for long established leagal ownership, residence in and cultivation of the land is moral duplicity.

    [Important to note as well that even after the much touted purchase of land from absentee Arab landowners, the total land area owned by the JNF was a mere 6%. Later imposition of fraudulent land laws enabled Israel to simply declare emptied villages and lands "absentee owned" and thus forfeit to Israeli possession; pure theft by any reasoned standard.]
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    some say that he is a fictional character,others say he is a ghost from a time long forgotten.........we just know him as "THE CLAN".
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    DEANO MAC wrote:
    some say that he is a fictional character,others say he is a ghost from a time long forgotten.........we just know him as "THE CLAN".


    Damn Right!
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    When critical reason fails and historic citations too bothersome to study, resort to the one liner. Impressive! :chin:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    When critical reason fails and historic citations too bothersome to study, resort to the one liner. Impressive! :chin:
    *DEANO_MAC takes slap on wrist*........i read all your posts,and i have learnt quite alot from you in the past year i think.but you have to admit your posts can make for heavy reading at times.my half arsed post was meant to be respectful humour,not an insult....sorry.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    No skin off my teeth. I put the details out and others can follow it up if they want to find out what was really pushing the political decisions from the start of this whole mess up to the present day. I expect the inevitable reactionist backlash.

    Heavy subject are far more deamanding of attention but admittedly tiresome when so much of the established text book explanations just tow a sanitised line. Its do central an issue to what is actually going on the ME is directly for US and Israeli interests in the region. Im fascinated by it personally.

    have a good one.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Skin of your teeth? Do teeth have skin? I thought it wa your nose where the skin came off...or not as the case is.

    Irregardless, Cland, when i have the time, i am going to read the full extent of that link you put up!
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Local variant from where I grew up, subject. Conflation of "by skin of my teeth" and "no skin off my nose".

    Then again, "Irregardless"? :chin:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    subject13 wrote:
    Britain did give their land for the Jews, it was called Palestine, we had it prior to world war 2 after all.
    It didn't belong to them... it belonged, naturally, to its residents.
    Nah, return to map no.3? that wouldnt solve anything, the palestinians would want way more.
    Wrong... that is what practically all Palestinians want. Including, you might be shocked to hear, Hamas.

    Yes, that's right. Even Hamas said yesterday (or rather, repeated, because they've been saying that for years) that they would be prepared to negotiate a full and permanent peace with Israel if the Israelis were to return the stolen land and return to 1967 borders (as per UN resolutions and international law calls).
    Also it is NOT a Nazi-Wall, it is a Wall...thats what the Communists/Soviets did! Nazis, build Huge death camps!
    When you build a Wall intended to enclose and concentrate people in sub-human conditions destroying their livelihoods and making them live in guetto-like conditions, you're closer to the Nazi way of thinking than to the communists.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    It was the Jews land. Thats their physical and spiritual home. Why shouldn't they have the land.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    No skin off my teeth. I put the details out and others can follow it up if they want to find out what was really pushing the political decisions from the start of this whole mess up to the present day

    No, you put out one sided and selective sources which advance your anti-Israeli agenda.
Sign In or Register to comment.