If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
Interesting question,isn`t it? Does anyone have an answer ?
seeker
It sounds great, but what the hell does it actually mean?
Thus the Tories have discovered they have one policy no one dares to question. :rolleyes: I haven't heard any detail about how they intend to go about it, but obviously I haven't heard everything Howard has said - does anyone have a link or more info?
Our Islamic bretheren know a few things when it comes to punishment!
The Taliban kept order very well, would you like to have lived under their rule?
having friends who have been subject to what you appear to advocate clearly indicates to me your lack of understanding on what this means. it also illustrates your lack of understanding of some of Jesus' (who you claim to follow) clearest teachings
But when it comes to my MP, I'm not a big fan of him personally and haven't seen from or heard from him for ages.
To me though you should always vote for your MP based on local issues, and not because of who you want to see in Government. Governments will never spend enough on roads/schools/crime/healthcare no matter how much they plough into them, so look at what MPs will do for you and vote accordingly.
Isn't this the case already though, aren't we all self employed now. I don't have to work for who I do, I choose to. My employer recompenses me for my time and knowledge at what we consider a fair rate.
How would your system differ. If iwanted someone to plumb for me, would I have to "pay" them?
They are.
A plumber pays taxes so that I do my job. I then get paid, from that I pay him to plumb for me.
The simple oncept is, if you never have need to (or want to) access public services then you wouldn't have to pay. Reality is that you will, and do need these services.
Nope.
If you want to get people to join you in an enterprise in a situation where everyone is self employed, then they have to become partners, sharing profit and risk equally. Every time you need a new person to do a job, you have to take on a new partner, with equal shares of risk and profit.
"A plumber pays taxes so that I do my job"
Explain the voluntary nature of taxes for me. I kind of think that they are kind of hard to refuse to pay. Unless the IR has changed his policy since ten minutes ago when I was arguing him away again.
"The simple oncept is, if you never have need to (or want to) access public services then you wouldn't have to pay. Reality is that you will, and do need these services."
Reads as gibberish to me I am afraid. What are you on about?
Again, I choose to work for somebody, that is the risk I take. The perons employing me takes a different risk.
We don't all, and can never all, take the same risks.
They are simple to avoid paying.
Drop out.
But, if you like, taxes are a way of us all being partners is the "company" that is the UK.
It isn't?
On what basis?
yadday yadda -
"the general object of which is to declare that no action shall be brought to enforce contracts of the more important class, unless they are put in writing, and signed by the parties to be held chargeable upon them"
-
From Ballantynes law dictionary.
Unless there is a written agreement signed by both parties there is no legally binding contract. For anything. At all. Ever. Take this knowledge and have fun with the taxman. (Those parties also have to be human beings too)
Remember signing up to UK plc?
Who was the counter-signatory?