If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
I still don't get it
A guy called Monocrat, this has got to be the 4th time he has been banned mainly due to rascism but he keeps coming back.
Firstly if the claim that the difference is 66 to 100, is patently wrong you only have to have known a few black people to know its not true, this is one of those warped tests, their compaiting uneducated rulal workers, with educated westerners, If we went back to the middle ages and did the test in england peasents compared to modern british black people, youd find that black people were more intelegent.
To claim the difference is 66 to 100 is stupid its self if you wanted to portray blacks as stupider then 95 to 100 cant be so easily dismissed.
What realy convinced me that the difference didnt have a genetic basis, was two tests done at the start of WW2 on american black anfd white troops, and one done reciently.
firstly what has happened is that in a more educated better fed society IQ has actually climed a few points in that 50 years.
In the test in WW2 it was found that whites were 5 or so points higher than blacks, and the recient tests showed still a difference but blacks were now at the level of whites in WW2,
this appears to prove that the reasons for the difference are social and economic, ie nourishment and education, as blacks in the USA are poorer and generaly have more 1 parent families, lesser schools etc, then this would account for the difference.
If you report the exact date and time, his ISP will know who was using that particular IP address at that time.
That bloke is seriously fucked up in the head... :no:
back to the topic Im quite pleased with my post wont you comment on it instead of that talking about that wanker
I didn't realise he'd be banned before, because he wqas here quite a while before he starting picking on everyone in the relationships forum.
He's a fruitloop, conclusive proof that Care in the Community doesnae work.
Dosnt someone have an opinion on my recientpost.
Hasn't Jim V turned your swearing filter off? He turned mine off:)
**************************************************
*****************************************************************'s to do that then,
Hay Jim V are you reading this when do I get to say the word ****, (only in context of course)
oh and very impressed with the WW2 reference
Just something to add to the whole slavery thing (Im not quoting this fool because of his excellent content or context only because of the reference to slavery): Did you know that mainly black caribean(I think its caribean or it might be african, but pirates from a black ethnic back ground) pirates used to kidnap people from a small cornish town on the coast and sell them as slaves?
Allow me to remind you that the theory of humanity originating in africa is just a theory, nothing more. If that theory is actually correct, then it might give credence to scientific racism.
But how could it lend credence to racism?
A white racist would argue that evolution resulted in a kind of ladder of races...if humanity originated in africa, then those who moved away from africa evolved to a higher level, and in turn that would explain the contrast in development between races.
I can see the reasoning behind it, not that i particularly give a fuck.
Its ironic that either way could be seen as racism,
Are we realy at a stage where any scientific theory is automaticaly wrong if a rasict person could twist it to their ends, regardless of the scientific fact one way or the other.
not sure but this could help
What's ironic about it?
Race is seemingly something mainstream science can't touch.
Mainly 'cos "race" is a social construct.
Does it have to relate to your race? Or even ever relate to your race?