If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options
"Bush lied..."
Former Member
Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
Proper usage would be ARE, as in, they are beginning to be found.
However, those with an extreme short attention span due to their preference to live in a movie inspired and constrained world, have not the patience for reality. Their delusions are ever so better supported by their prejudice, than fact... even when the unearthing of small objects in a large country requires a bit more than the 2-hour parameter time frame of a movie...
As in...
The lie and defamation are page one. Everybody LOVES it...
The truth, and retraction? Are buried where no one will find them.
Hardly surprising, considering the ilk of those who found their prejudice so delicious, in this place...
we told you there were lots of lies to be found ...we found them in the white house ...
Not fluid like UK with floating voters, UKIP and all that
if you believe there are WMD'S stashed away still ...what do you base your beliefs on? you can't believe something without a basis for that belief.
My favourite posters at cross purposes
But keeping an eye on the ball has never been the Bush admin's strong point.
No WMDs.
No threats to world peace.
No links to 9/11.
No links to Al Qaida.
In fact, has Bush actually told the truth a single time since he cheated into office Thanatos?
P.S. What are you doing this weekend? Any plans to go to the movies? Perhaps to see this year must-see film Fahrenheit 9/11?
When is that out over here?
It's filled with the truth, 'course I will.
You have to bear in mind that Thanny likes to use a subject title that he believes will attract all the gullible pantywaist liberals. In fact, the truth is that any topic started by him brightens up our online time. He's so... visceral! <
titters shrilly :hyper:
While Bowling for Columbine brought up some interesting points, the furthest I would say about the truth in that movie, is that it is a very stretched truth, fitted to make th situation seem as he wants it.
I wouldn't base any of my opinions on such a movie alone.
But yes, who knows what fahrenheit 9/11 will bring.
Errrrr...hello? Ever heard of a little place called Iraq and the fact that its in a complete fucking mess due to the actions of Bush and Blair? Actions predicated on the finding of WMD's? :rolleyes:
I think British films are shit, but I don't hate myself.
WWII was THE most just war of all time. Nothing in the second millenia AD comes close. Christian Crusades? Discovering America/Africa/Australasia and killing/enslaving the natives? Iraq II? Nope. So please don't compare them. It's quite insulting.
is this realy the kind of person YOU would vote for to lead the 'free' world?
Its a piece of entertainment, its created to make money, I personally would take everything Moore says in it with a large pinch of salt.
Moore's films and books should be treated with the same amount of scepticism as those on the right, for example Bill O'Reilly and Anne Coulter.
You drunk? Saddam was telling the truth abou no WMD's, he even released video's of them being destroyed way back when. Im Supprised no cruise missiles have turned up with 'USA' crossed out and 'Iraq' written on in permanent marker...
Serious, Iraq was all about Oil, Cuba poses more of a threat as they could stop making Cigars. Don't ask me why Cuba is on the Axis of evil list, all they have is one rusty old Russian anti-air missile in a farmers feild, which doesn't work. And a few MiG's, the MiG-29 is superiour to the F-15 though, but they only have 2... oh, and lots of Cigars!
saddam won't be standing in the elections ...he's tied up at the moment.
I agree what right does any state have in owning such vile weapons even though they are a democracy?
I know of the MAD scenario and its impact it had on the cold war but they should be outlawed fully by the UN and destroyed.
Read these words of FoxNews’s O’Reilly
O'REILLY: Because look . . . when two percent of the population feels that you're doing them a favor, just forget it, you're not going to win. You're not going to win. And I don't have any respect by and large for the Iraqi people at all. I have no respect for them. I think that they're a prehistoric group that is -- yeah, there's excuses.
Sure, they're terrorized, they've never known freedom, all of that. There's excuses. I understand. But I don't have to respect them because you know when you have Americans dying trying to you know institute some kind of democracy there, and twp percent of the people appreciate it, you know, it's time to -- time to wise up.
And this teaches us a big lesson, that we cannot intervene in the Muslim world ever again. What we can do is bomb the living daylights out of them, just like we did in the Balkans. Just as we did in the Balkans. Bomb the living daylights out of them. But no more ground troops, no more hearts and minds, ain't going to work.
Do you agree that Iraqis are ‘prehistoric’ and ‘primitive’?
And even if they are is this a justification to bomb them?
In which way ‘no respect for them’ can be connected to ‘Liberation’?
Do you share this sadistic approach ‘no troops, just bomb living daylights out of them’?
I’m sure you don’t think so.
But if you don’t think so why do you support this war? Just because America is a good counterbalance to the EU?
Scuse me but it is a bad rationalisation. Maybe to be a province of American Empire is better than to be a province of European Empire but I don’t think the difference is so huge. Don’t you think that the best solution is to be independent and fuck all empires like EU, US, UN etc?
That's NOT why our soliders gave up their lives!
It was for these WMD which do not exist! Or are hidden..;)
What do you think would happen if Iran or North Korea invaded somewhere when all the rest of the UN had said no?
you realy don't get the point.
These weapons are dangerous and should not be in the hands of anyone including the UK, France, Russia and the US.
1. The US is the only nation in the world to have used nuclear weapons. And on civilian population as well.
2. The US has caused more deaths through the use of chemical weapons than any other nation in the history of mankind. More than 1.1 million people in Vietnam alone have been killed, injured or born with hideous defects thanks to the indiscriminate use of Agent Orange by the US. And to top it all, the US government was fully aware at the time of the extreme toxicity of the agent and the likely consequences it would have on the enemies, the innocent civilians and even its own American forces.
3. The US is the most likely country to use nuclear weapons again. The deranged, lunatic, dangerous scumbag currently sitting in the White House has given his full support to the development of low yield 'battlefield nukes' (and signalled that the US would probably use such weapons once they're ready) and the next-generation of nuclear warheads. In addition he has torn up the non-proliferation treaties that had been in place for decades in order to allow him to develop his missile defence shield. As a result of this needless and pointless actions Russia and China have announced their plans to upgrade their delivery systems and even to re-start their own nuclear programmes.
So thanks to that fucking piece of shit we now have a new arms race going on.
Of all the nations that have or would like to have nuclear capability, the US should currently be the biggest concern to us all. I'd sooner trust a monkey with the nuclear briefcase than that idiot.