If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Should the voting age be lowered? Why or why not?

All behaviour is a need trying to be met.
Should the voting age be lowered? Why or why not? 15 votes
Yes
46%
7 votes
No
40%
6 votes
Not sure
13%
2 votes
0
Comments
The thing about immaturity is a fair point, but i guess that could be the same for some 18 year olds too.
It is the younger generation that politics influences the most in terms of housing, work and personal life. Therefore, they deserve a say in the political influence that creates the world they live in. However, alongside this lowered voting age needs to be a prioritisation of better political understanding taught through schools. Politics is not currently a part of the general curriculum and many people have large misconceptions about specific parties, which may be untrue. It's important that children gain a wider understanding of the thing which impacts them so directly, and have a say in it.
16 year olds can give consent, start jobs, leave school, leave home, choose their GPs, why can't they vote?
People may think that 16 year olds are 'immature' but like others have said, the exact same thing could be said for 18 year olds.
I think 16 year olds are capable of understanding what the government does. And im not saying this because im a 16 year old myself. Sometimes the government may decide on (unfair) changes that may affect 16 year olds who are in college or secondary school, or working (doing apprenticeships).
For example, rishi sunaks 'british baccalaureate'
plan which, from my understanding, is complete nonsense. There is no 'anti-maths mindset' in fact, theres stigma around those who aren't good at maths, theres a massive stigma around those who go onto the vocational pathway. There's actually stigma around 'soft subjects.'
Not all people are able to do subjects that involve lots of maths. There are things such as dyscalculia which might make maths and subjects that involve maths quite difficult for people who are affected by dyscalculia. Anyways im not entirely sure how he will implement a 'baccalaureate' because education is so underfunded. Which is wrong. Education should get more money.
Even though im not in high school anymore (im in 6th form) it will affect those younger than me, those who are still in secondary school. Already, when i was doing my gcses (year 9-11) there was alot of pressure, and not everyone is meant to do STEM subjects, not just because of dyscalulia or anything like that, but when you do STEM subjects, students are more competitive and might think they're smarter than everyone else (some of the alevel physics students were like that when i told them i might retake my gcses to get on to alevel physics...) But im not trying to hate on stem students, i aspire to be one, and i think im going off a tangent talking about rishis baccaleaurate
thats besides the point im trying to make.
16 year olds are more capable than people think they are, at 16 we have finished high school, we have been through the pressure of gcses, and we would be moving on with our lives, going onto higher education or work. Furthermore, the younger generation are the ones who will be more influenced by the changes the government makes, the younger generation is also most affected by global warming and climate change aswell. So i think we should get a say in what will happen to us. Otherwise that would be a bit unfair.
My birthday is in september, so I turned 16 right at the start of year 11. Looking back to then, I was not mature enough to vote but I also did not feel ready to do everything else that is allowed at 16 haha. It does depend on the person but I would say its fair and makes sense to lower it to 16. Definitely with all the other things you can do at this age