Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options

Post Saddam Iraq.

Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
It's exciting that the war has already started with special ops people infiltrating Iraq's military ranks. Muslim Americans have made a lot of this possible as well as Iraqi exiles. Like seeing the girls go to school in Afghanistan, it's going to be exciting to see people freed. This was on Yahoo News today.

Rumsfield

"It would be our goal to quickly transition from military leadership -- we don't want an American general running a Muslim country for any length of time -- to civilian leadership, either an American civilian initially or an international figure," Powell said.

Administration officials say Baghdad already has a substantial governing structure in place. Unlike Kabul, Afghanistan, where the United States had to assist the Afghans after the Taliban's ouster, Iraq has infrastructure, institutions and a developed middle class, according to Powell.

The people of the UK and US should be proud that they actually stand up for people - as opposed to France and Germany who only stand for making a buck...even if it's blood money - taking medicine from Iraqi children.

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Re: Post Saddam Iraq.
    Originally posted by pnjsurferpoet
    The people of the UK and US should be proud that they actually stand up for people

    If by people you mean the general population I might agree with you. If you meant the governments... well don't even start me on that. :lol:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    pnj, you really are a sucker for American propaganda!
    Was there a little B&W movie clip with that report, an American soldier holding up Saddams severed head whilst other soldiers fed small children from their canteens?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I can't wait to see those people free from Saddam's brutality. I can't wait for the truth to come out about how France and Germany kept him in weapons byprofiting from the UN's oil for medicine and food program.

    But mostly, I can't wait for a democratic Muslim country to be created so that people can see there's an alternative to Al Qaeda's hatred.

    I can't wait to know we are striking a blow against Al Qaeda by disrupting the flow of chemicals, knowledge and bioterrorism expertise to them from Saddam.

    And once again people in the UK and America will know, their character freed people...again.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    You constantly make references to France and Germany's nefarious dealings.

    Could you please explain exactly what it is they did?

    I seem to have missed something somewhere.....:confused:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Here Toadborg. But you can find more detailed stuff on France's dealings with Iraq -

    From the NY POST

    Powell told Congress that he plans to ask the French and German representatives whether they are "just delaying for the sake of delaying, in order to get Saddam Hussein off the hook."

    Indeed, why are Germany and France so anxious to preserve Saddam's rule that they are willing to alienate the United States, deprive a NATO ally (Turkey) of the protection it needs in the event of war and split the European Union?

    Could it be that a successful overthrow of Saddam might put Western troops in possession of information that would be extremely embarrassing to both countries, and especially Germany?

    Everyone knows that France has massive investments in Iraq (and has made a fortune out of the U.N. oil-for-food program). Everyone knows that it is worried that a successor regime might not honor contracts made by Saddam.

    But according to a dossier obtained by a German newspaper, German companies have been Iraq's biggest supplier of modern weapons and dual-use technology and have been flouting U.N. sanctions for years - all while Berlin has turned a blind eye.

    Given the pacifist claims of German premier Gerhard Schroeder, and given Germany's own history of using poison gas against civilians, the confirmation of these reports would be devastating, to put it mildly.

    Powell should hold their feet to the fire.

    One hopes that, when the reason for Germany's persistent, perverse efforts to block the liberation of Iraq finally become clear, it will turn out to have more to do with deluded folly than with mercenary criminal activity.

    Unfortunately, one cannot be too optimistic about that.


    __________________
    My prayers are with our troops and for Tony Blair.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    A democratic Iraq is highly unlikely in the aftermath of a US invasion, especially in view of the liklihood that it will be viewed as little more than another US imposed puppet regime with no true constituency amongst the factious tribes.

    As for Al Qaeda, well since they have no relevance whatsoever to the Iraqi situation, this new show of the Military Industrial Complex wont demonstrate anything to the Arab world except further US aggression against an already beleaguered and destitute nation.

    You keep waiting for the truth to come though pnj, perhaps by then youll be old enough and world wise enough to understand that that truth will not make the Bush era look as heroic as you currently have been brainwashed to believe.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I don't think everyone is pure in the Bush administration. What are the chances of a father and son becoming President? They must have some power and influence.

    But Al Qaeda is out to get America. And I don't care who helps us get him. Personally the way Saddam feels about the militants in Iran, I wish we'd have used him to go to war against Iran again. So to me, they must have proof that he's destablizing the region and getting in the way of creating a free, unarmed Palestine. And as you know, Palestine is used by Al Qaeda to recruit.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    There is no "must have" anything, pnj. What the Bush admin DOES have is a well developed spin factory capable of snowing the American public into believing whatever they give as justification.

    Did you read and absorb anything from the Pentagon Papers links that i put up earlier? If so, you should have a small idea of how capable Washington is of deceiving the public.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Clandestine
    A democratic Iraq is highly unlikely in the aftermath of a US invasion, especially in view of the liklihood that it will be viewed as little more than another US imposed puppet regime with no true constituency amongst the factious tribes.

    Newsweek Special Edition - Issues 2003, December 2002-February 2003

    Page 28; Memo: How to Rebuild Iraq by Kenneth Pollack & Joe Siegle

    Page 50; The Dawn after Saddam by Bernard Lewis

    Seems there are some who disagree with you, Clandestine.

    Of course, the examples of Japan, Germany, Italy, and the Philippines should also be ignored, right?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Nice try greenie, but Iraq is not akin to the more homogenous European cultures, it is akin to most factious tribal states of the Middle East and has enough in fighting in its own history to demonstrate how any imposed regime will be seen as illegitimate by the Iraqi people.

    You truly are gullible if you think they are welcoming our invasion, however much they might detest Saddam.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Clandestine
    Nice try greenie, but Iraq is not akin to the more homogenous European cultures, it is akin to most factious tribal states of the Middle East and has enough in fighting in its own history to demonstrate how any imposed regime will be seen as illegitimate by the Iraqi people.

    You truly are gullible if you think they are welcoming our invasion, however much they might detest Saddam.

    I suggest you do a bit of research on both the history of Germany and the history of the Philippines. Neither is exactly homogenous or hasn't had a fractious history. And of course, the US itself isn't exactly a homogenous nation, either, is it?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    as a culture they are homogenous, but then not understanding political demography, you wouldnt understand what is meant by homogeneity. You are comparing a tribal culture to those of the industrialised West (apart from Philippines where i would grant you some comparative legitimacy).

    Our electoral systems are homogenous when it comes to consistent transfer from one admin to the next.

    I suggest you go back to school and study political science before wading too deeply into that pool ol boy.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I cannot understand the American consternation at the French-German activity at the moment.

    They offered another way to deal with the problem they have not 'let Saddam off the hook'

    Protect Turkey:lol:

    As concerns the trade with Iraq, that was carried out by private companies, when has any govt made a massive effort to stop any of its unethical companies?

    Free market profiteering is the American dream! :rolleyes:

    The least our govts can do is be honest and admit this war is about self-interest, thus what moral grounds do we have for critiscing the Frenach and Germans if they behave in a self-interested manner?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Clandestine
    as a culture they are homogenous, but then not understanding political demography, you wouldnt understand what is meant by homogeneity. You are comparing a tribal culture to those of the industrialised West (apart from Philippines where i would grant you some comparative legitimacy).

    Our electoral systems are homogenous when it comes to consistent transfer from one admin to the next.

    I suggest you go back to school and study political science before wading too deeply into that pool ol boy.

    And I suggest you go back to school and study history, anthropology and linguistics before trying to argue where you obviously are without knowledge. Homogeneity is an anthropological and cultural term, not a "political" term. Germany is so "homogenous" that the German tribes took thousands of years to form a single nation.

    And even if we ignore Germany, we still have the Philippines...a nation with far more tribal groups, far more languages and a far stronger history of conflict, as well as natural borders, yet has managed to make a representative democracy work for the bulk of its constituents.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    its just another case of Washington's deplorable hypocrisy. Rile the American people with spin aimed at making this about national senitment rather than criticism of foreign policy so we can march on in and plunder by force of arms what other nations can achieve peacefully.

    Wouldnt do to admit the truth Toad, that would blow the cover on the US coporations waiting hungrily to grab up even more world resources. But that's okay see, because its American profiteering. What? culpability in human rights abuses ourselves?? shhhhhhhh! youre not allowed to say that! :lol:

    The American Empire is on the march!
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Toadborg

    As concerns the trade with Iraq, that was carried out by private companies, when has any govt made a massive effort to stop any of its unethical companies?

    You mean like:

    Standard Oil
    AT&T
    IBM
    Microsoft

    ???
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Toadborg. The enemy is Al Qaeda and its enablers. No one is saying all leaders are pure or whatever. You're missing the point. We need to fight Al Qaeda in all the ways it works.

    Read something scary today. Do you know why the UK and US are in such a heightened state of alert. No, do you really know?

    First there was a rise in chatter and fragments of plans for Al Qaeda to attack. Money transfers to Al Qaeda operatives were tracked. Emails thought to come from one of the main people to plan 911. The chatter got very loud and then on Wednesday night went dead silent...as if the Al Qaeda operators are now in place.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    More like Unocal, Haliburton, DynCorp, the Carlyle Group, or Exxon to name a few.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Or so you are being lead to believe pnj. From the looks of it so long as Al Qaeda is mentioned in any excuse of our administration, youll believe it without question. Itll be interesting to see if you are as gullible when youre older as you show yourself to be now.

    Spin spin spin, but don't get dizzy my boy!
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Fair enough but that has nothing to do with the French, German etc. stance on Iraq, the two issues are not the same thing despite your insistence on making the link....

    Fair enough Greeny but I am sure there are examples of the French and German governments occasionally censuring their home businesses but when has it been a matter of govt priority to monitor and censor all business activity and why should govts be blamed for the activity of their businesses.

    I would never think to lay the brunt of the blame for Nestle's behaviour on the Swiss govt and I also think it is foolish to lay the blame for German compnaies activities in Iraq on the German govt unless they were directly involved......
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Toadborg

    I would never think to lay the brunt of the blame for Nestle's behaviour on the Swiss govt and I also think it is foolish to lay the blame for German compnaies activities in Iraq on the German govt unless they were directly involved......

    When it comes to Arms sales, governments are almost always involved.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Then why have we not heard you apply the same standard to our own weapons proliferations to tyrannical and brutal regimes around the globe, eh greenie? You bucking for a job on the White House staff? :lol:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Clandestine
    Then why have we not heard you apply the same standard to our own weapons proliferations to tyrannical and brutal regimes around the globe, eh greenie? You bucking for a job on the White House staff? :lol:

    So, when did the US make Arms sales to a country under international arms embargo?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Ah but Greenie, the embargo card is but one minor aspect in this long running war of spin and rhetoric. Of much greater consequence here is the morality card which has been played upon so heavily by the Bush administration (aka "he has gassed his own people..."), ignoring the fact that whilst we might have made "technically" legal sales to third countries, a large number of those to whom we sold have been (and indeed are in some case still today) brutal and murderous regimes.

    One cannot simply say, if we are to ascertain the contextual integrity of our own government's arguments, that momentary legality alone is sufficient to exhonerate our own weapons proliferations. If we have learned nothing else its that a nation must be responsible in its arms sales as well.

    Moreover, in at least one example I know of, that of the Iran Contra scandal, whilst the reciepient country was not under embargo, the sale nonetheless was in itself conducted illicitly, and behold, to one of the countries so prominently featured in Bush's "axis of evil".

    In terms of the position of the hawks as to the legitimacy of Washington's present condemnation of certain brutal regimes, one cannot divorce our own complicity in financing and arming such regimes without facing the consequence that we face today, namely, the erosion of Washington's own credibility in the international community.

    From Noriega, to Pinochet, to Suharto, to Saddam himself during the Reagan era, even yes to Billy boy's own ill considered sale to the Chinese, as well as numerous others if the records are searched thoroughly, the proliferation of our weapons systems to untrustworthy governments or insurgency movements must be taken into account if you like Bush are so ready to condemn other nations for their arms proliferations.

    Those who live in glass houses should not be throwing stones, let alone propagating war. In the end it will just come back around to bite us once again as it already has.

    (an interesting article if anyone bothers to read it through) :

    http://www.counterpunch.org/nimmo0919.html

    If not, this exerpt is particularly poignant:

    Corporations that have sold dual-use chemicals and biological samples to Iraq for its weapons program include: Phillips Petroleum, Unilever, Alcolac, Allied Signal, the American Type Culture Collection, and Teledyne. Teledyne pled guilty to charges of criminal conspiracy, false statements, and violations of the Export Administration Act and the Arms Export Control Act for indirectly exporting 130 tons of zirconium to Iraq through Chilean arms manufacturer Carlos Cardoen. The zirconium was intended for use in cluster bombs. In defense, Teledyne argued during the trial that the CIA had authorized the shipments. The Baltimore company Alcolac was convicted of illegally selling thiodiglycol--a chemical precursor used in the production of mustard gas--for use in Iraq's chemical warfare program.

    When Murray Waas and Craig Unger published an article in The New Yorker about the Reagan administration and Bush's involvement with Saddam Hussein--a full three years before Howard Teicher's revelatory affidavit--they were roundly condemned and mocked by the corporate media. Steven Emerson of the Wall Street Journal called the article a "Byzantine conspiracy theory," while Michael Fumento, a syndicated columnist, said the story was "a big fat nothing," baseless innuendo that "spread like a flesh-eating bacteria into newspapers, newsmagazines, and television news throughout the country." Others accused a liberal media of attempting to derail Bush's re-election bid.


    Funny how it takes a Washinton whistle blower to show America just how inundated it is with lies, spin and cover-ups by the Washington spin factory and its corporate media lapdogs. When the truth of this admin's lies emerge, it will extremely amusing to see the hawks retreat back into their caves of silence hoping for the day when America will fall back into compliant slumber so they can reemerge to do it all over again.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    The information you posted was interesting Clandestine.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Clandestine
    Teledyne pled guilty to charges of criminal conspiracy, false statements, and violations of the Export Administration Act and the Arms Export Control Act for indirectly exporting 130 tons of zirconium to Iraq through Chilean arms manufacturer Carlos Cardoen. The zirconium was intended for use in cluster bombs. In defense, Teledyne argued during the trial that the CIA had authorized the shipments. The Baltimore company Alcolac was convicted of illegally selling thiodiglycol--a chemical precursor used in the production of mustard gas--for use in Iraq's chemical warfare program.

    Kind of contradicts the position that governments aren't involved and don't police the activity, doesn't it?

    Or do you think the "whistle blowers" took those companies to court? :rolleyes:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    No but often there is no legal action if no whistle is blown and even youll have to agree with that fact, we've seen it proven in the not too distant past.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Clandestine
    No but often there is no legal action if no whistle is blown and even youll have to agree with that fact, we've seen it proven in the not too distant past.

    In Arms Sales?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Actually yes, already cited previously, "Iran-Contra". Just a shame that Ronnie didnt get his ass fried for it as well!

    His Foreign Policy fortune teller mustve warned him the jig was up in advance so he could shred any record of his involvement and leave Ollie holding the bag.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Clandestine
    Actually yes, already cited previously, "Iran-Contra". Just a shame that Ronnie didnt get his ass fried for it as well!

    His Foreign Policy fortune teller mustve warned him the jig was up in advance so he could shred any record of his involvement and leave Ollie holding the bag.

    Maybe you haven't noticed, but I am not exactly a fan of Oliver North. Then again, Ollie did get punished for that, I believe...

    although I'm not sure exactly what the crime is when you sell weapons that don't work to someone... fraud?
Sign In or Register to comment.