If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options
Kate Moss will not be charged for 'snorting footage' incident
BillieTheBot
Posts: 8,721 Bot
Supermodel Kate Moss will not be charged over claims she took cocaine, the Crown Prosecution Service has said.
Pictures of Moss, 31, allegedly taking cocaine at a London recording studio last September appeared in a newspaper.
The CPS said the film footage "provides an absolutely clear indication that Ms Moss was using controlled drugs and providing them to others".
But the "precise nature" of the drug could not be established and there was "insufficient evidence" to prosecute.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/5082546.stm
According to a thread on another forum, the investigation has cost the taxpayer £250,000.
Well, that was money well spent. :rolleyes:
Perhaps the tabloid newspaper in question who acted so responsibly and selflessly when it made the footage public will care to foot the bill.
Beep boop. I'm a bot.
0
Comments
i was allowed to not give evidence in a criminal case when i told the judge that at the time ...i was high as a kite on drugs so couldn't be relied upon to know much about what was realy going on.
the judge asked me what drugs i was high on ...can't remember your honour ...bit of a mixture.
are you an addict ...yes your honour a heroin and nicotine addict.
i was excused very politely by the judge.
you cannot be charged with being a drug taker.
how the hell this has cost £250,000 is beyond me.
how and even why ...it got any further than a chat in the local police station is beyond me.
Which then goes 'This is something - we'll do it'
And why should the taxpayer have to pay for something which quite frankly, isn't anything to do with us?:rolleyes:
The police screwed up, obviously, but if someone had presented the Mirror, rather than the authorities, with photographic evidence of Gary Glitter molesting a ten year old girl, would they have printed it first, or taken it to the police? That example is on a different level, but the opportunity to convict Kate Moss was thrown away by a money grubbing hanger on. No-one can say what Moss was taking, so the case failed, but the photographer and the Mirror knew what they thought she was taking, and did nothing. I say again, shouldn't they face charges?
she got away cos there was absolutely nothing they could charge her with.
it is not an offence to have pictures of white powder.
it is not an offence to admit you take drugs.
a poor unknown student would have got the same result ...no charge ...but a lot quicker.
the police are guilty of idiocy for even attempting to make this stick.
Kater Moss is our druggy role model and her ex bf. If you want their looks, then take drugs. :thumb:
I'd quite like to look like Kate actually. But anyway. I agree with Rolly.
Granted im a bloke, so i wouldnt want to, but she is sooooo thin and bony, and tall and bleurgh. Lyndsay Lohan when she had a bit of meat on her or Scarlett Johanson, thats the hot look!
I like the way she looks. No crime in that, is there?!
And has always looked the dog's bollocks, cocaine or no cocaine.
Do not try to compare her or her looks with that of her (ex)boyfriend. The boy needs help and has a serious heroin addiction. The same cannot be said however of most other recreational drug users.
the national health service is collapsing due to the drugs epidemic of the last forty years ...the assylums are full.
link to kate
I've got massive boobs and I'd trade to look like Kate straight away. I think she's stunning - and so do the majority of people or she wouldn't be the hugely successful model that she is.
True.