If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options
Iran Incapable of Building Nuclear Bomb — Russian Expert
Former Member
Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
It would take Iran over 20 years to produce any nuclear weapons.
Look at India and Pakistan :eek: They hate each other and both are Nuclear and they have not used any on each (they cancel each other out and this will help prevent any more wars between them two)
They lied about WMD.
They are lying about Iran too.
http://www.mosnews.com/news/2006/02/01/iranunable.shtml
Look at India and Pakistan :eek: They hate each other and both are Nuclear and they have not used any on each (they cancel each other out and this will help prevent any more wars between them two)
They lied about WMD.
They are lying about Iran too.
Iran is not capable of building its own nuclear weapons, the former head of a nuclear power plant and current regional leader in southern Russia said Wednesday.
“In reality, the U.S. is provoking Iran, accusing it of aiming, along with the implementation of its peaceful nuclear programs, to create its own nuclear weapons,” Governor of the Saratov Region Pavel Ipatov was quoted by RIA Novosti as saying.
Ipatov, who was head the Balakovo power plant for almost 20 years, said that currently, in view of the methods in place for controlling the proliferation of nuclear weapons,
“Iran is in no state to create a nuclear bomb secretly.”
The United States, along with the trio of European negotiating with Iran (Great Britain, France and Germany), are employing “double standards” in accusing Iran of attempting to create nuclear weapons, and this greatly complicates the situation the country, he said.
If Iran’s nuclear file is referred to the UN Security Council, Russia and China, both veto-wielding permanent members, could block resolutions on Iran, the governor said.
http://www.mosnews.com/news/2006/02/01/iranunable.shtml
0
Comments
Which is why they would want one in the first place.
It's not about Oil. the US currently can have as much as it wants just by printing dollar bills. It's about keeping the dollar from collapsing completely.
Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that they are next door to eachother? A nuclear war between neighbours wouldn't last very long, methinks....
Iran's Government disputes Israel's right to exist.
Do you know the History?
Were do you think the Muslims living in Palestine for centuries have gone :wave:
They were just like tenants - looking after the place until the rightful owners came back ...
Iran’s fundamentalist fanatical leader is an extreme Muslim fundamentalist; his desire to ‘wipe Israel off the map’ and his vicious denial of the Holocaust but assertion that one wouldn’t be a bad idea displays the danger of this disgusting regime. No doubt the prospect of nuclear war might be quite attractive to an Iranian leader expecting his 72 virgins in return for destroying Israel.
I do find it odd how a country with such acute poverty and massive oil reserves with no pressing need for nuclear facilities is instead of helping its poor people seeking to acquire nuclear weapons. Well I would if this vile regime hadn't already made clear its aim of destroying our ally Israel.
No-where. Most of them are still there. Same cannot be said for the majority of the Jews who'd been living in Arab lands.
Though what this has got to do with Iran's belief that israel has no right to exist beats me.
Something too often forgotten.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_exodus_from_Arab_lands
And lets not even go into how Israel treated the Jewish refugees compared to the Arab mistreatment of Arab refugees...
...and of course how Israel treated Arabs refugees. But then that's just inconvenient, eh?
Interesting that the scholarly Avi Shlaim, born an Iraqi, doesn't share his uncritical regard for the Israel State's treatment of and generations long perspectives and rhetoric toward Arabs.
Just a tad.
Iran should just do the deal with Russia for the enriched Uranium and shut everyone up.
Not really.
Following the 1948 war there were similar numbers of Jewish refugees from Arab states and Arab refugees. The new Jewish state was not fairly wealthy as it is today, yet at great expense and discomfort it absorbed the vast majority of the Jewish refugees (the rest mainly going to America) – meanwhile whatever you think about Israel it is undeniable that for over five decades the Arab states have used Arab refugees as a political pawn. Lets also not forget that were it not for the Palestinians themselves and the Arab states the Palestinians could have had their own state at numerous points in the past – sadly consistently instead of willing to share the region and favouring peace they’ve chosen conflict. Indeed, some things sadly don’t change it seems; while we’ve seen Israel willing to compromise the Palestinians have elected to government a party dedicated to the wholesale destruction of the State of Israel.
I find it convenient how those that champion Arab refugees never care to mention Jewish refugees – I wonder why that it is. I hope it’s coincidental but sadly I think that’s probably being naïve.