Home› Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options

should the law be changed such that

Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
in Politics & Debate
someone whose claiming asylum cannot work for 6 months from the begining of their claim

i propose this should be reduced by 3 months AT LEAST....

agree? or not? and explain

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Refugees should have full rights to work. Asylum seekers should be supported by the state until their claim is accepted or rejected. Failed asylum seekers should be allowed to apply for British citizenship, or perhaps a temporary working visa. Asylum claims should be processed much quicker.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Kentish wrote:
    Refugees should have full rights to work. Asylum seekers should be supported by the state until their claim is accepted or rejected. Failed asylum seekers should be allowed to apply for British citizenship, or perhaps a temporary working visa. Asylum claims should be processed much quicker.


    works

    need to hire more immigration officers to process claims as well
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Kentish wrote:
    Refugees should have full rights to work. Asylum seekers should be supported by the state until their claim is accepted or rejected. Failed asylum seekers should be allowed to apply for British citizenship, or perhaps a temporary working visa. Asylum claims should be processed much quicker.

    What have you been smoking? Crack?
    Asylum should stop imminently, they have no reason to come here as they are supposed to seek asylum in the first country closest to them, they have caused social problems here and not to mention we are full,
    we have been one of the kindest most generous countrys in the world when it comes to asylum, but now its time to look after our best interests and say no.

    Most asylum seekers are liars, their lives are not in imminent danger they are just economic migrants.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Isenheart8 wrote:
    Most asylum seekers are liars, their lives are not in imminent danger they are just economic migrants.

    Evidence?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    The way I see it,if they are over here,they may as well be working and paying taxes like everyone else,not sponging off the state.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Isenheart8 wrote:
    What have you been smoking? Crack?
    Asylum should stop imminently, they have no reason to come here as they are supposed to seek asylum in the first country closest to them, they have caused social problems here and not to mention we are full,
    we have been one of the kindest most generous countrys in the world when it comes to asylum, but now its time to look after our best interests and say no.

    Most asylum seekers are liars, their lives are not in imminent danger they are just economic migrants.

    :lol: you obviously don't know kentish's opinion on illegal drugs...............and you're an idiot unless you happen to work in the home office dept. and would like to supply us with some facts (the sun doesn't count btw)?........thought not :yeees:

    Noone looks at how economic migrants have benefited this country, its all a dumb generalisation by people like yourself.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    and what is so evil about people making a migration decision on economics?
    surely this has always been the way ...
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Brief explanation for Isenheart: you get labour, and jobs, right? Lets simplify this in terms of labour, people offering to work = supply of labour, jobs for people to take up = demand for labour.

    But the problem with this is sometimes there is an excess demand in one area (I.e. London) but in other places there is an excess supply of labour (the north east, other countries in economic turmoil...). So the best way to deal with this? Move the jobs and the people around! This is exactly what immigration is doing = it's bringing people to the country to work for the jobs we have people aren't doing. Of course, it's only one approach, we build call centres up in yorkshire (hence call centre staff are normally asian, irish or yorkshire/scottish).

    The bottom line is more jobs means more money moving about, meaning more tax (wages = income tax, purchases = v.a.t, etc etc). More tax means a richer government, which means (usually) a more prosperous country.

    Immigrants are helping to make Britain a better place.
Sign In or Register to comment.