If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
Love the ad:yes:
they got their revenge on him though and nailed him to the cross
protip: dont mess with the bankers
I think a little research will reveal you have neglected the lawyers and the priests who were subjected to similar revulsion (most notably in the book of Matthew).
Bankers,lawyers and priests . . . . . the Unholy Trinity ?
Maybe because he was not a taxpayer ?
Oh for sure he didn't like the religous lot ...in fact calling them vipers and the sons of satan but ...the only people he ever seems to have gotten violent with are the bankers.
Aside from anything else I dont want a government who can decide someones individual wage.
But you don't mind those same people being responsible for policing education health defence and so on ...strange.
US bank Goldman Sachs has said that its 30 top executives will not receive any cash bonuses in 2009.
All bonuses will be in the form of restricted shares, which cannot be sold for five years.
The new policy is aimed at discouraging excessive risk-taking in the wake of the global financial crisis.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8406860.stm
Not really. Education, health etc. are needed for the greater social good. I just don't have enough faith in government to want to give them control over the private businesses.
Rather than worrying about bonuses we should be worrying about getting our money back by (given we are a majority shareholder) taking some of the banks profits to repay our debt.
Isn't that what they are doing? The banks are trying to pay out their profits in the form of bonus payments when what they should be doing is giving it back to us.