If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Very easy on the eye, but is there more to it?
BillieTheBot
Posts: 8,721 Bot
According to the Mail: "A prison officer who claims she was hounded out of her job after repeated criticism for being too sexy and 'glammed up' is demanding compensation from Jack Straw at an employment tribunal. Petite Amitjo Kajla told the hearing how colleagues complained that she wore too much make up and that her clothing was more revealing than the standard issue uniform... Another inmate was overheard telling Miss Kajla: 'I wouldn't mind taking you back to a cell', the tribunal heard today."
She was based at Brinsford Young Offenders Institution near Wolverhampton. One look on Wikipedia and you will discover that "In 2008, an additional residential unit and activity centre were built at Brinsford. This resulted in a reduction of places for Juveniles, and an increase in places for Young Offenders at the prison." Young offenders are those over the age of 18. So the idea that a sexually frustrated young male, stuck in prison all day, would tell an attractive female officer that he "wouldn't mind taking [her] back to a cell' shouldn't be news to anyone.
I'll be the first to admit that this Amitjo Kajla is very easy on the eye, although I don't think we've got the whole story here. But I can't help but ask myself - why would a 22-year old woman with a size four frame want to work in a young offenders institution? These "young offenders" (or criminals, as I prefer to call them) could be capable of being very dangerous - without meaning to be sexist, how would such a petite woman defend herself against some of these men if they were to turn nasty, for instance?
A case of someone being in the wrong job, methinks. Over to you.
She was based at Brinsford Young Offenders Institution near Wolverhampton. One look on Wikipedia and you will discover that "In 2008, an additional residential unit and activity centre were built at Brinsford. This resulted in a reduction of places for Juveniles, and an increase in places for Young Offenders at the prison." Young offenders are those over the age of 18. So the idea that a sexually frustrated young male, stuck in prison all day, would tell an attractive female officer that he "wouldn't mind taking [her] back to a cell' shouldn't be news to anyone.
I'll be the first to admit that this Amitjo Kajla is very easy on the eye, although I don't think we've got the whole story here. But I can't help but ask myself - why would a 22-year old woman with a size four frame want to work in a young offenders institution? These "young offenders" (or criminals, as I prefer to call them) could be capable of being very dangerous - without meaning to be sexist, how would such a petite woman defend herself against some of these men if they were to turn nasty, for instance?
A case of someone being in the wrong job, methinks. Over to you.
Beep boop. I'm a bot.
0
Comments
You really can be a tit sometimes.
It's The Daily Hate - you can't be sure you have a story, let alone the whole story.
I've been to a prison once to visit someone and not all officers I saw were particularly muscley or big by any means, but there has to be a cut off point I suppose. A person who is too small to portray any sort of physical authority might not be best suited to be in charge of watching over prisoners, for obvious reasons I would have thought.
The very fact that these prisoners knew where she lived of all things means she wasn't up to it.