Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options

Abortion Doctor thingy

Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
Apparently there's a bit of a crisis because so many doctors are unwilling to carry out abortions on "moral grounds." And I say on "moral grounds" because apparently a lot of them are refusing it on social stigma grounds rather than genuine moral grounds. But anyway, should doctors be allowed to opt out of certain procedures on moral grounds, or should they be required to do every job that they've signed up for?
«1

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    But anyway, should doctors be allowed to opt out of certain procedures on moral grounds, or should they be required to do every job that they've signed up for?

    Carrying out abortions isn't a job that doctors sign up to by pursuing medicine as a career.

    Abortion is an emotive subject and people have a wide range of beliefs towards it. The decision to have an abortion or not to is a deeply personal one and must ultimately always be one of individual choice. Likewise the decision on whether to partake in an act deemed acceptable by some and horrific by others should be a personal one.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Carrying out abortions isn't a job that doctors sign up to by pursuing medicine as a career.

    What makes you say that?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Whilst I don't agree with someone choosing not to carry out abortions, especially given the reasons usually given, there is a name for people who aren't allowed to refuse work (whether on moral grounds, to go on strike, or any other reason)

    It's called a slave - and I don't believe any society should force a person to do anything they don't want to do - although that doesn't mean there shouldn't be consequences for that decision.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Renzo wrote: »
    What makes you say that?

    Do you think it is? I don't think many medics would agree with you.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Carrying out abortions isn't a job that doctors sign up to by pursuing medicine as a career.

    Well no, there's always been an opt out. It's always been one of the many procedures they could be asked to do though, and it is a medical procedure. So should they have to or not? And if not, what do we do about the girls that can't get an abortion? (Obviously the long term aim should be to try and cut the number of women who end up in this position in the first place, but in the meantime).

    I've gotta say though, it does make me slightly uncomfortable that a lot of doctors are refusing to do it simply because they don't like the idea of telling their friends, rather than because of genuine moral concerns.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Jim V wrote: »
    Whilst I don't agree with someone choosing not to carry out abortions, especially given the reasons usually given, there is a name for people who aren't allowed to refuse work (whether on moral grounds, to go on strike, or any other reason)

    It's called a slave - and I don't believe any society should force a person to do anything they don't want to do - although that doesn't mean there shouldn't be consequences for that decision.
    Yep, it's called being fired. :p
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Absoluetly - in certain circumstances - but no one performing such an important medical proceedure should be in a position where they feel forced to do it, if only for the chance that might increase the mistakes they may make.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Do you think it is? I don't think many medics would agree with you.

    I'm With Stupid basically says what i think. Its a medical procedure. Doctors have to be prepared for anything.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Okay, here's a hypothetical dilemma that would be without a doubt a medical procedure (because I can understand why people might not consider abortion a medical procedure). If a doctor was required to treat an illness, but the method of treatment involved the use of foetal stem cells, which the doctor morally objected to, should they be allowed to opt out?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Being allowed to opt out is silly, opting out should be taken at the accepting/ not accepting the job offer stage. Imagine if road sweepers refused to sweep streets because of the 'stigma', it's just silly.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    woohoo, another giant prick at large!
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Renzo wrote: »
    I'm With Stupid basically says what i think. Its a medical procedure. Doctors have to be prepared for anything.

    Fuck off, you're having a laugh. Do you really want your GP doing any procedure? Of course not so let's get this into perspective. Not all doctors should/could carry out all procedures.

    1. There are specialist units which carry out terminations. As a doctors, if you work there, then you shouldn't opt out. But realistically, who would work there if they didn't want to be involved?

    2. Terminations are not life threatening so, of course, doctors should be able to opt out.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    katralla wrote: »
    woohoo, another giant prick at large!

    No, someone who has principles and will stick up for them. There is no suggestion there that women should not be allowed to terminate their pregnancy, only that this person won't do it.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    giant prick principles. religion and medicine should be kept seperate.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    As MOK said, most are carried out in specialist units. Because OB/GYN is branching out further into foetal medicine, a lot of future OB/GYNs will want to specialise in that. Plus a lot of medics of my generation haven't seen what illegal abortion does to women, so with the advancing technology bringing the foetus into the spotlight, the woman will be pushed out more.

    So long as medics know how to perform a D&C as it's important in cases of missed miscarriages, and diagnostic procedures, I don't really have a problem. And as long as the woman is *always* referred to another doctor for a referral, and not have the process dragged out for them.

    The type of doctors who judge women like that don't deserve to be OB/GYNs :) There are a small number of people (e.g. me) willing to perform abortions as it's a valuable service to many women.
    I choose to be a doctor to assist the sick, I don't choose a career to take up murder imo

    Aaah, the bright eyed, bushy tailed statements of the doe-eyed pre-medics, how I've missed it ;) Seriously though, what happens then, when you get women wanting abortion referrals in your practice?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    xsazx wrote: »
    I'm intending on going to medical school to be a GP in 2 years but certainly won't be carrying abortions (religious/moral reasons) and do not believe such tasks should be forced. I choose to be a doctor to assist the sick, I don't choose a career to take up murder imo
    How about the pregnant woman? Does she not deserve your help?

    Whereas I guess we have to put up with members of a profession refusing to carry out some of their duties because of moral/religious objections it is by no means a welcome situation. And when people insist on using so indescribably inaccurate and inappropriate terms such as 'murder' for a medical practice that is nothing of the sort, one has to wonder if their moral compass isn't going to get in the way of offering patients the best care possible in other areas as well.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Life experience might change that. I was certainly very black and white at 16. I know of a medic who was very much against it, until she became pregnant...

    And even General Practice won't leave someone immune from unplanned pregnancy, wanted pregnancies that were terminated for foetal abnormality - and the care a family needs for that afterwards. Some doctors make their opinions known to their patients, as I heard at an Abortion Rights talk. "I could never do such a destructive thing." "Abortion is illegal after 12 weeks" "How much do you earn? You can pay for it yourself" - and that must stop.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Fuck off, you're having a laugh. Do you really want your GP doing any procedure? Of course not so let's get this into perspective. Not all doctors should/could carry out all procedures.

    1. There are specialist units which carry out terminations. As a doctors, if you work there, then you shouldn't opt out. But realistically, who would work there if they didn't want to be involved?

    2. Terminations are not life threatening so, of course, doctors should be able to opt out.

    No i'm not saying they should carry out anything in your local GP surgery. I was thinking more about hospitals where i would assume the procedure we are talking about would be peformed? At said units?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I was thinking more about hospitals where i would assume the procedure we are talking about would be peformed? At said units?

    Marie Stopes and BPAS take on a lot of cases, including NHS ones.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Isn't this part of a wider problem. MoK will be able to tell me if I'm spouting rubbish but my understanding was some new system for training Doctors in there specialisms had meant that some skills such as General Practice have too many Doctors and others (not those do abortions) had too few, and that there may be an element of spin to the original story....
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    MMC/MTAS = can of worms ;) not too sure, actually in terms of abortion and choosing specialities, haven't thought about it in that context before.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I have no problem with doctors opting not to do abortions, as long as they are happy to make suitable referrals and they don't chose to work in clinics where abortions are arranged or take place and would be a significant part of their job (I don't include general practise in that as it's not usually a significant part).

    Likewise I wouldn't want to require doctors to perform any procedure they are not comfortable doing, if you're not happy doing it you're more likely to screw up, be that getting a line into a vein on someone like me, or performing abortions.

    I'm a lifeguard, I will lifeguard any session including the naturist ones, and I am happy to do so. Some of my colleagues aren't, so they chose not to work that shift. It's the same principle.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Here's some food for thought:

    assume for whatever reason, the abortion is needed because it is life threatening. The foetus has already died and a surgical extraction is necessary (arguably the most 'difficult' thing for a surgeon / specialist to do in terms of morals). Would a professional surgeon say 'eww no, I don't like it'. No, they would still carry out the same procedure I think.

    If for whatever other reason i.e. unexpected pregnancy - then isn't it one of the fundaments of medicine not to judge / prejudice treatment of patients? It's the same procedure that in a different circumstance you would do, but because of your own morals (opinions) you don't fancy it.

    But if you don't fancy doing them then you don't need to work in one of these clinics. But as I said, if it was a doctor in a hospital - they sign up to treat patients, and I think it's their responsibility as a professional doctor to treat them however they can in accordance with legislation. Abortion is legal in the UK, so they may have to do that.

    A doctor isn't any profession, there is an enourmous amount of responsibility on their shoulders, and I don't think it's ethical for them to 'shrug' that responsibility if it suits them. But, they can choose whether they want to be a doctor or not, in a village surgery or hospital or in a clinic.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    then isn't it one of the fundaments of medicine not to judge / prejudice treatment of patients?

    Even if a doctor is against abortion they *must* refer the patient to a doctor who isn't - it's a little more difficult in rural areas where there may only be 1 GP in practice. But even in other fields like General Practice, as I said, no doctor is immune from seeing patients with unwanted pregnancies - for a lot of women who can't afford the £600 for a private abortion, their GP is the first port of call.
    But as I said, if it was a doctor in a hospital - they sign up to treat patients, and I think it's their responsibility as a professional doctor to treat them however they can in accordance with legislation. Abortion is legal in the UK, so they may have to do that.

    It's a little different now that the private abortion providers take a lot of cases. In some district hospitals, there aren't many 'abortion lists' for surgery anymore as the providers are contracted to do NHS terminations. You can never force a doctor to do something against their will though. So long as access to abortion isn't denied, I don't really have a problem with some surgeons opting out, providing that there are other surgeons to do it. Some are indeed on the decrease, but I don't think it's at a crisis point yet. I do have a problem, however, with women having to be exposed to nasty comments from someone thinking they have the moral high ground.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    If I was pregnant (and as man that would be a miracle in itself) and I was considering what to do i'd much rather be talking to a doctor who could give me the pros and cons, rather than one who was either really anti-choice (or come to that one who was strongly pro-abortion)

    Personally I think the system is pretty good in that a Doctor can opt out, but has to make sure that there is another Doctor who can take over and give medical advice
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    go_away wrote: »
    Marie Stopes and BPAS take on a lot of cases, including NHS ones.

    Yep - BPAS took on my case when the hospital refused me.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I wouldn't mind there being a system where you could know if the GP in your practice wouldn't refer you, that way they wouldn't have to deal with anyone coming to them, and the woman doesn't have to be exposed to any additional stress. Problem with that though, is that it's quite a personal thing to ask, and it could lead to other things being called into question. I know that Marie Stopes a while ago wanted clients to tell them if they had GPs trying to stall or make referral access difficult, to create a 'blacklist' but I'm not sure how off the ground that got.

    Even so, we've had referral letters in the past who had said they are against abortion, and they are referring the client to us, but they have still provided the first signature on the HSA1 form.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    VinylVicky wrote: »
    Yep - BPAS took on my case when the hospital refused me.

    Out of interest Vicky, if you don't mind talking about it - did the hospital refuse you on grounds of 'conscience'? If it wasn't, don't worry, I'm always interested in what is said to people in this situation.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    go_away wrote: »
    Out of interest Vicky, if you don't mind talking about it - did the hospital refuse you on grounds of 'conscience'? If it wasn't, don't worry, I'm always interested in what is said to people in this situation.
    The lady said she wouldn't give consent as she thought I was too far gone (15 weeks) and she didn't agree with it being so late on. She gave me details of the BPAS though but I had to wait 'til I was 19 - 20 weeks to have it done. Having it done quite so late on was rather upsetting but no fault other than my own I guess.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Jeez, really sorry that happened to you. It's not uncommon though, a lot of women wait for the appointments, get refused for whatever reason, and then have to wait again. While I believe that abortion should be as early as possible and as late as necessary, I don't think it's necessary for a woman to be ping-ponged from GPs to hospitals then to clinics if she is refused, making the pregnancy advance as the weeks go by. 2nd trimester abortions have enough stigma as it is.
Sign In or Register to comment.