Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options

Gypsies

123457

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote: »
    Fairynuff. Although tbh, I don't really give a toss about shoplifting from supermarkets. Fair play to 'em.

    :yeees:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote: »
    Fairynuff. Although tbh, I don't really give a toss about shoplifting from supermarkets. Fair play to 'em.

    :confused: How is that any kind of argument? My respect for this debate has suddenly taken a turn for the worst.

    So now it's OK for a gypsy to steal from a supermarket? Ridiculous.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    pah1986 wrote: »
    :confused: How is that any kind of argument? My respect for this debate has suddenly taken a turn for the worst.

    So now it's OK for a gypsy to steal from a supermarket? Ridiculous.

    I don't give a toss who steals from supermarkets tbh, they don't have to be a gypsy.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote: »
    I don't give a toss who steals from supermarkets tbh, they don't have to be a gypsy.

    Whys that?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote: »
    I don't give a toss who steals from supermarkets tbh, they don't have to be a gypsy.

    Absolutely and completely absurd. I was listening to your points and assumed them to be valid, but that kind of opinion is dangerous and stupid.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Tweety wrote: »
    Whys that?

    Well we'd have to start a thread about property rights and the nature of capitalism for me to go into any great detail.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    pah1986 wrote: »
    Absolutely and completely absurd. I was listening to your points and assumed them to be valid, but that kind of opinion is dangerous and stupid.

    Why's that then?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote: »
    Well we'd have to start a thread about property rights and the nature of capitalism for me to go into any great detail.

    Oh yeah, and I'd have to admit I'm ever so slightly on the wind up...but only slightly. :D
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote: »
    Fairynuff. Although tbh, I don't really give a toss about shoplifting from supermarkets. Fair play to 'em.

    Someone championing gypsies and new age travellers doesn't have a problem with shoplifting. Doesn't really help your case.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Someone championing gypsies and new age travellers doesn't have a problem with shoplifting. Doesn't really help your case.

    Help my case? LOL! :D

    You don't half come out with some toss. :D:D
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote: »
    Leaving aside the appalling state of housing benefits services and social housing, why should they be forced to conform to living in a house? It brings into play wider issues about who gets to say what lifestyles are acceptable in society.

    If they want to live the way they do, that's fine but they do it on societys terms or not at all.. thats how it works for everyone!

    Why can't I walk around in public naked all the time? I am born without clothes and it is natural - why should I be forced to conform to it?

    I'll tell you why - because that's how society works - not everyone gets what they want - thats tough but its how it works.

    Don't be pathetic. Not the same thing is it?

    Fail to see how I am being pathetic - Benefits and Social help are not there to subsidise a lifestyle of a persons choice - They are there to provide the bare essentials and keep people off the streets etc wherever possible which should be ideally the cheapest and fairest way to use the tax payers money - is that not correct?
    So it sucks and people should just put up with it, yes?

    Yes until it improves - as stated plenty of times before, why should they get special treatment at our expense?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru

    Why can't I walk around in public naked all the time? I am born without clothes and it is natural - why should I be forced to conform to it?

    I'll tell you why - because that's how society works - not everyone gets what they want - thats tough but its how it works.

    Well i don't know about anyone else, but i wouldn't have a problem with you doing that :p

    Sorry am i allowed to say stuff like that in here?!
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Firstly, can I clarify who Jim V believes to be bigoted and racist?

    I find it amazing that my opinion can be written of as racist because upon consolidating the experiences of myself, friends, family, and internet posters, a common thread of unpleasant experiences has surfaced.

    I have gone out of my way to explicitly state that I don't for one second think that gypsies are intrinsically criminal or violent, and that I suspect that there are a number of sound sociological theories which would go a long way to explaining the aforementioned observations.

    If being critical of traits which appear to be disproportionately prevalent in a given social group is construed as small-minded and bigoted - even after expounding the reasons for such thought - then i'm really at a loss of whether I want to post here anymore.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    If they want to live the way they do, that's fine but they do it on societys terms or not at all.. thats how it works for everyone!

    If society is unjust? What then? Just accept it?
    Why can't I walk around in public naked all the time? I am born without clothes and it is natural - why should I be forced to conform to it?

    I think you should be able to as it goes. Different societies have very different attitudes to nakedness. I wold prefer it if we had a more relaxed attitude to bodies, I think it would make for a less messed up world.
    I'll tell you why - because that's how society works - not everyone gets what they want - thats tough but its how it works.


    That's not telling me why, that's just saying "it is how it is".
    Fail to see how I am being pathetic - Benefits and Social help are not there to subsidise a lifestyle of a persons choice -

    Being born into a culture with hundreds of years of history is not a "lifestyle choice" - which is why I said you were being pathetic. Your analogy is completely off beam.
    They are there to provide the bare essentials and keep people off the streets etc wherever possible which should be ideally the cheapest and fairest way to use the tax payers money - is that not correct?

    That's one interpretation, certainly.
    Yes until it improves - as stated plenty of times before, why should they get special treatment at our expense?

    I'm not arguing for anyone to get special treatment. I'm arguing for everyone to get just and fair treatment.

    You seem to think that people should just put up with injustice. If everyone thought that way, we'd still be sending children up chimneys.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Firstly, can I clarify who Jim V believes to be bigoted and racist?

    I find it amazing that my opinion can be written of as racist because upon consolidating the experiences of myself, friends, family, and internet posters, a common thread of unpleasant experiences has surfaced.

    I have gone out of my way to explicitly state that I don't for one second think that gypsies are intrinsically criminal or violent, and that I suspect that there are a number of sound sociological theories which would go a long way to explaining the aforementioned observations.

    If being critical of traits which appear to be disproportionately prevalent in a given social group is construed as small-minded and bigoted - even after expounding the reasons for such thought - then i'm really at a loss of whether I want to post here anymore.


    Close the door on your way out.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote: »
    Close the door on your way out.

    Haha, it'll take more than your trademark curt one-liners.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Haha, it'll take more than your trademark curt one-liners.

    Make yer mind up! Flounce or don't, who gives a fuck.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote: »
    If society is unjust? What then? Just accept it?

    No, but breaking the law and upsetting other citizens isn't the way to go about fixing those injustices is it? Two wrongs don't make a right.

    I think you should be able to as it goes. Different societies have very different attitudes to nakedness. I wold prefer it if we had a more relaxed attitude to bodies, I think it would make for a less messed up world.

    I agree - but the point I am trying to make is that we can't, because that is how it stands in our society at the moment. Until societys principles on it are changed then it is our duty as citizens to follow it. Surely that is the how the whole underpinnings of a civilized society works

    Being born into a culture with hundreds of years of history is not a "lifestyle choice" - which is why I said you were being pathetic. Your analogy is completely off beam.

    OK, well maybe explain that next time instead of writing it off with quite a provocative word ;)

    Fair point with the analogy being off beam, but saying they were born "into a culture" is not an excuse for breaking the laws - If that were the case then society would not evolve and become (in theory) more civilized as time goes on.
    I'm not arguing for anyone to get special treatment. I'm arguing for everyone to get just and fair treatment.

    Please explain to me how them being emergency sheltered and placed on a housing list with the rest of the poor people waiting is not just and fair?
    You seem to think that people should just put up with injustice. If everyone thought that way, we'd still be sending children up chimneys.

    Now who's analogy is off beam...

    RE the point you are making - Injustice in many aspects is down to opinion.

    I think it's an injustice if a private land owner or farmer has their land wrecked by (what may well be the minority) of modern travellers.. don't you?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote: »
    Make yer mind up! Flounce or don't, who gives a fuck.

    Curt non-post #7892.

    Blaggy, you're really cutting deep now.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    No, but breaking the law and upsetting other citizens isn't the way to go about fixing those injustices is it? Two wrongs don't make a right.

    So the suffragettes were unjustified? Or civil rights protests in the southern states?
    I agree - but the point I am trying to make is that we can't, because that is how it stands in our society at the moment. Until societys principles on it are changed then it is our duty as citizens to follow it. Surely that is the how the whole underpinnings of a civilized society works

    So we're back to just putting up with things?

    OK, well maybe explain that next time instead of writing it off with quite a provocative word ;)

    If you had read the thread and the links posted, you would know that gypsies and Irish travellers are not a a lifestyle choice. Its not up to me to explain what's already been covered on the thread.
    Fair point with the analogy being off beam, but saying they were born "into a culture" is not an excuse for breaking the laws

    So if your culture and way of life was outlawed, you'd just accept it would you?
    - If that were the case then society would not evolve and become (in theory) more civilized as time goes on.

    On the contrary, its exactly how society evolves. Rights are never willingly granted by the powers that be, they have to be fought for. A basic knowledge of history should tell you this.
    Please explain to me how them being emergency sheltered and placed on a housing list with the rest of the poor people waiting is not just and fair?

    Because I don't think anyone being housed in a shitty B&B or hostel and having to wait years to get decent housing is just and fair.
    Now who's analogy is off beam...

    In what way? You're arguing that we should quietly acquiesce to injustice and never take action to make things better.
    RE the point you are making - Injustice in many aspects is down to opinion.

    Well, its contingent on where you sit in society, yes.
    I think it's an injustice if a private land owner or farmer has their land wrecked by (what may well be the minority) of modern travellers.. don't you?

    Depends. If that land is not used for anything else and the travellers have nowhere else to go and are allowed time to clear up when they leave, then no, its not an injustice. What is an injustice is that vast amounts of land are owned by a minority of people...[insert something about the enclosures acts here].
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Curt non-post #7892.

    Blaggy, you're really cutting deep now.

    Quit with the melodrama, no one gives a shit.
  • Options
    JsTJsT Posts: 18,268 Skive's The Limit
    Blagsta wrote: »
    Quit with the melodrama, no one gives a shit.
    Argument lost so resorting to mindless insults.

    Top work Blagsta!
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I think most of the points of view have been covered in this thread, and if things are going to descend into squabbling then I think it will be best to close this thread, if people can't find their own way out of the playground.

    I'll see how it is in the morning - but even if the thre4ad is closed I'de suggest people at least spend time reading the threads posted.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Gypsies, Tramps and Thieves... Cher really used to be good you know, lessons to be learned.
  • Options
    SkiveSkive Posts: 15,286 Skive's The Limit
    It's quite clear that most people experiences of travellers are related to those living on illegal sites - and that only constitutes 30% of the traveller population. Jsut goes to show that peoples generalisations are actually based on a minority of the traveller community. Bit foolish don't you think?

    And if the majority of the problems many of you talk about are only associated with illegal camps, does it not make sense to allow the travellers planning or to encourage councils to provide autorised sites?

    Here in South Wiltshire and there are a number of autorised sites, several not far from where I live including one in the neighbouring village. Although the land and amenities are provided by the council, the travellers living on the site pay for them.
    The kids from these sites are then able to go to school, have clean running water and sanitation. The travellers have access to the local surgery etc etc.

    It's quite clear from this thread that although many of you have experiences ith travellers, not many of you actually understand them, their culture, their history and their wants.
    Weekender Offender 
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Skive wrote: »
    It's quite clear that most people experiences of travellers are related to those living on illegal sites - and that only constitutes 30% of the traveller population. Jsut goes to show that peoples generalisations are actually based on a minority of the traveller community. Bit foolish don't you think?

    Not really foolish if we don't know - most people base their opinions on thier own experience rather than on statistics.
    And if the majority of the problems many of you talk about are only associated with illegal camps, does it not make sense to allow the travellers planning or to encourage councils to provide autorised sites?

    Here in South Wiltshire and there are a number of autorised sites, several not far from where I live including one in the neighbouring village. Although the land and amenities are provided by the council, the travellers living on the site pay for them.
    The kids from these sites are then able to go to school, have clean running water and sanitation. The travellers have access to the local surgery etc etc.

    It's quite clear from this thread that although many of you have experiences ith travellers, not many of you actually understand them, their culture, their history and their wants.

    Seems fair enough to me - as long as it doesn't cost disproportionatly(Sp) more to tax payers than it would to put them in shelters and house them normally!
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Not really foolish if we don't know - most people base their opinions on thier own experience rather than on statistics.

    Yeah I agree with that part. Although it seems irrational to make claims such as 'oh about 90% of them'. A statistic which is your opinion and you one which you have no proof whatsoever to back it up.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Rachael wrote: »
    Yeah I agree with that part. Although it seems irrational to make claims such as 'oh about 90% of them'. A statistic which is your opinion and you one which you have no proof whatsoever to back it up.

    Where have I said about 90% of "them" !?:confused:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Sorry I should have said. Back in the begining of the thread a few people said this. No idea if you were one of them.
  • Options
    SkiveSkive Posts: 15,286 Skive's The Limit
    Not really foolish if we don't know - most people base their opinions on thier own experience rather than on statistics.

    This site has taught me how stupid generalisations are. People from all walks getting on when in the street they would give each other the time of day. Apearances and backgrounds mean fuck all on here, it's your beleifs and what you have to say that count. It's waht my sigs about.

    Seems fair enough to me - as long as it doesn't cost disproportionatly(Sp) more to tax payers than it would to put them in shelters and house them normally!

    What is so wrong with people in genuine need, recieving more from the taxman than they give?
    Weekender Offender 
Sign In or Register to comment.