Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options

Legal Aid abolished in Magistrates Courts

New rules introduced today have made it almost impossible to get Legal Aid in the magistrates courts, meaning that unless you are hyper-rich you can't afford to defend yourself.

Only people earning less than £11,000 a year will be eligible for Legal Aid. Predictably the Government has said this is clamping down on "the rich" getting aid.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/5396872.stm

Thoughts?
Beep boop. I'm a bot.
«1

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    With all the measures they are bringing in I fail to see the point of court anymore for most people.

    Just bring them in and give them the pointless jail sentence you want to give them.

    Hell, even if you are found not guilty they still will find a way to deport you.

    Out of interest, how much would it cost to defend yourself, roughly speaking?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Seems pretty unfair as basically means only people who don't work would get it...(although in my experience a huge number of people in mag's courts don't work)..

    But on the other hand a lot of stuff in mags doesn't really require the use of lawyers. A lot of stuff doesn't require them really. I have to stop myself from snorting when I hear some of the crap they come out with.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    right so if you earn £12,000 you should have plenty of money to pay for things like that:rolleyes: . Perhaps some of them should try to live off £12,000 without any of that on top and see how they get on.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Tweety wrote:
    right so if you earn £12,000 you should have plenty of money to pay for things like that:rolleyes: . Perhaps some of them should try to live off £12,000 without any of that on top and see how they get on.

    Which is just crap.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Sofie wrote:
    Which is just crap.

    Crap as in hard to live on or crap as in you don't agree?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    As in hard to live on. It doesn't seem right that because you earn over 12k that you should have to pay for legal aid.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    It should be only for those in need, but getting means testing right is a bastard, and doesn't necessarily take into account everything.

    What cases can you push to have heard in Crown courts?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    You can request that ANY case is in heard in the crown court. It is your right as a defendant to be tried by jury if you so wish.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    You can request that ANY case is in heard in the crown court. It is your right as a defendant to be tried by jury if you so wish.

    That is incorrect. Only certain crimes (more serious ones) can be heard in the crown court.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    We all know what this is about really, though.

    It's about making the crime figures look better- how many people will plead guilty when they didn't do it because they can't afford to pay for the solicitor to defend themselves? And if they do do it alone, how easy will it be for an experienced CPS lawyer to wrap them up in knots?

    As it stands, if you are acquitted you get reasonable legal costs back, and these fees are higher than on the legal aid scheme. However, this a) isn't publicised (but is why many legal aid lawyers will do pro bono work for "valued" clients- every so often they win) and b) isn't much of a concern when you have to stump the cash up front.

    Even if you have a chance of going to prison you will have to pay fees, and so will be denied access to important legal advice unless you have the money. How many people have the spare cash to pay £300 or £400 out in one go?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Kermit; Do you get legal aid (or will you) if you are defending yourself against an ASBO, because I know they want to broaden them to include 'problem drug dealers' what ever the hell that means.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I'm not too sure, tbh. I believe so, subject to the new restrictions, but I could be wrong because an ASBO is a civil not a criminal matter.

    I've done legal aid work on defending and appealing ASBOs, but they've always been for people with mental difficulties, who are entitled to legal aid regardless.
  • Options
    SkiveSkive Posts: 15,286 Skive's The Limit
    How does this affect duty solicitors Kermit? Would you have to pay for a duty solicitor if arrested?
    Weekender Offender 
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    People should have the right to legal representation no matter what their income is. This brings us one step closer to a police state.

    "Is every body happy!? You bet your ass we're happy!"
  • Options
    SkiveSkive Posts: 15,286 Skive's The Limit
    People should have the right to legal representation no matter what their income is.


    You still have the right to be represented, it's just that now it's more likely you'll have to pay for it.
    Weekender Offender 
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Skive wrote:
    How does this affect duty solicitors Kermit? Would you have to pay for a duty solicitor if arrested?

    I think that's still free, its just when it gets to court you will be means tested on the assistance you receive, instead of receiving it free of charge if the matter will result in you losing your liberty or livelihood.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    PussyKatty wrote:
    That is incorrect. Only certain crimes (more serious ones) can be heard in the crown court.

    You can request your case goes to crown, at very least, you are legally entitled to have your case heard by Jury, in which case they can select a 6 person jury, even in a magistrates.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Skive wrote:
    You still have the right to be represented, it's just that now it's more likely you'll have to pay for it.
    ok, and suppose you don't have the money but still are above the level of income where the aid stops?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    You can request your case goes to crown, at very least, you are legally entitled to have your case heard by Jury, in which case they can select a 6 person jury, even in a magistrates.

    :no:

    There is no jury in a magistrates court. There are different types of offences, less serious ones can not be tried in the crown court even if the defendant wants them to be. Eg: motoring offences, threatening behaviour. :no:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    ok, and suppose you don't have the money but still are above the level of income where the aid stops?

    It kinda means you're screwed and they might as well convict you upon charging. Our min wage is £5.05 per hour. What the £11k means in real terms is that anyone who works full-time and can try and will try in their lives will be above automatic level of free legal aid. 40hrs a week in a £6hr job takes you well above this pathetic £11k limit.

    The people who will be worst affected by this are those in entry level jobs, younger people and/or those working long hours/two jobs on minimum wage- usually those who are less well educated and therefore those who are least likely to have the time, tenacity and resources to prepare a decent defence for themselves... These are likely to include single-parents struggling to support themselves outside of the benefit system and those who have literacy/education needs, self-esteem/mental health issues etc - the people we should be helping not banging them up without access to fair representation. And like Kermit said- who has a spare £400 to stump up upfront just to speak to someone who knows what they're doing to keep you outta jail?

    Then, throw that in with the fact that Magistrates are not trained in law AT ALL! They are volunteers from within the community who do not get paid and can only claim minimal expenses for their efforts. In theory most anyone can be a magistrate (though you are supposed to declare any freaky allegance to certain group/allegances). In practice - how many people can afford to be a volunteer? And, how many people in low in come households and entry level jobs where this move will hit hardest either know they could apply to be a magistrate or could afford to do it? As much as I'm adverse to reverse snobbery, I find it to be true that magistrates are... country-club, cucumber sandwich eating, golf players and (oh yeah- stick a sock in it, there she goes again) black and ethnic minorities are still significantly under-represented...


    Boo!
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    katralla wrote:
    It kinda means you're screwed and they might as well convict you upon charging. Our min wage is £5.05 per hour. What the £11k means in real terms is that anyone who works full-time and can try and will try in their lives will be above automatic level of free legal aid. 40hrs a week in a £6hr job takes you well above this pathetic £11k limit.

    The people who will be worst affected by this are those in entry level jobs, younger people and/or those working long hours/two jobs on minimum wage- usually those who are less well educated and therefore those who are least likely to have the time, tenacity and resources to prepare a decent defence for themselves... These are likely to include single-parents struggling to support themselves outside of the benefit system and those who have literacy/education needs, self-esteem/mental health issues etc - the people we should be helping not banging them up without access to fair representation. And like Kermit said- who has a spare £400 to stump up upfront just to speak to someone who knows what they're doing to keep you outta jail?

    Then, throw that in with the fact that Magistrates are not trained in law AT ALL! They are volunteers from within the community who do not get paid and can only claim minimal expenses for their efforts. In theory most anyone can be a magistrate (though you are supposed to declare any freaky allegance to certain group/allegances). In practice - how many people can afford to be a volunteer? And, how many people in low in come households and entry level jobs where this move will hit hardest either know they could apply to be a magistrate or could afford to do it? As much as I'm adverse to reverse snobbery, I find it to be true that magistrates are... country-club, cucumber sandwich eating, golf players and (oh yeah- stick a sock in it, there she goes again) black and ethnic minorities are still significantly under-represented...


    Boo!
    fuck am I glad I live in the states.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    My brother recently had a run in the police and he is receiving legal aid. With out my family would have had to spend big bucks they really cant afford.
  • Options
    SkiveSkive Posts: 15,286 Skive's The Limit
    fuck am I glad I live in the states.

    :lol:

    In country that still uses capital punishment.
    Weekender Offender 
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Skive wrote:
    :lol:

    In country that still uses capital punishment.
    that's right, in a country that still uses capital punishment, and still gives legal aid to anyone who wants it. If I go shoot someone in the next week, I know I'll at least have legal representation when I go to my sentencing hearing.

    again, fuck I'm glad I live in the USA.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    that's right, in a country that still uses capital punishment, and still gives legal aid to anyone who wants it. If I go shoot someone in the next week, I know I'll at least have legal representation when I go to my sentencing hearing.

    again, fuck I'm glad I live in the USA.

    Yes, and that legal representation will tell you to plea bargin because its your only hope. The judge will then ignore your guilty plea bargin and give you a whacking long sentence.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    that's right, in a country that still uses capital punishment, and still gives legal aid to anyone who wants it. If I go shoot someone in the next week, I know I'll at least have legal representation when I go to my sentencing hearing.

    You're confusing legal aid and legal representation.

    Legal aid is where the Government pays the defence solicitor for you- you don't have that in the US, do you? All that's changed is that the "rich" (anyone who works, basically) will have to pay instead- you still get your lawyer if you pay for one.

    PussyKaty, I'm pretty sure any defendant can elect for Crown Court for criminal offences, and that this has not been removed. Certain motoring offences are no longer criminal matters.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Kermit wrote:
    Legal aid is where the Government pays the defence solicitor for you- you don't have that in the US, do you? All that's changed is that the "rich" (anyone who works, basically) will have to pay instead- you still get your lawyer if you pay for one.

    In the US, (as far as I know) you are always given representation, so you will get a lawyer for free if you cant afford it. But they are a deeply mixed blessing. A huge number of them are basically just there to push you through the court as quickly as possible and into a cell.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Oh, fair enough.

    Sounds a lot like the aborted "community defender" programme over here, where instead of an independent criminal solicitor working for you, you were press-ganged into taking a solicitor from what was basically the CPS.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Kermit wrote:
    Sounds a lot like the aborted "community defender" programme over here, where instead of an independent criminal solicitor working for you, you were press-ganged into taking a solicitor from what was basically the CPS.

    Exactly, you get the 'state defender' who may be a just out of law school idealistic person who is willing to fight hard for you all the way. Or it might be a crap lawyer who cant get a job elsewhere and doesnt give two fucks about you.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    budda wrote:
    Yes, and that legal representation will tell you to plea bargin because its your only hope. The judge will then ignore your guilty plea bargin and give you a whacking long sentence.
    Some of the time yes, mostly in larger cities. But at least you have a lawyer
Sign In or Register to comment.