Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options

Second Homes

2»

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Most landlords aren't corporations. Most landlords are investors using the ridiculous tax laws in order to price their tenants out of the market.

    Most corporations that run buy-to-let properties also use the same laws to their advantage, they make their money from the appreciation in property values.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Kermit wrote:
    Most landlords aren't corporations. Most landlords are investors using the ridiculous tax laws in order to price their tenants out of the market.

    Most corporations that run buy-to-let properties also use the same laws to their advantage, they make their money from the appreciation in property values.
    Which means you'd have to do it on a huge scale in order to make any sort of profit, which means even fewer companies would be able to do it, and they'd be able to charge whatever they wanted. Any additional costs will be passed on to the tennant obviously.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    They wouldn't be able to charge what they wanted, because most people would be able to buy instead of rent.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    :sour: at buy to let people.

    If they want to buy big fuck-off houses to rent out, then fine. But when they buy up the smaller ones (i.e. ones that first time buyers would've been able to afford millennia ago, without rich parents), then they piss me off.

    I hate having to fund the parasites, but forty-five grand wouldn't even get me somewhere in Bradford. Renting bollockes any illusion of stability (especially when you rely on housemates), I couldn't give a damn about the "property ladder", but essentially being answerable to someone I'm fucking paying makes me a little (more) bitter.

    I don't especially resent my landlord, because this flat would've (if it'd been built then) never been first time buyer material even before silly property prices.

    Kermit, it's rich Londoners rather than just southerners. They fuck up the south with their holiday homes as much as anywhere, unfortunately.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I broadly agree with Kermit's post. I see holiday homes far for immoral than buy to let, specially in certain towns, areas, for the reasons Kermit has pointed out.

    Buy to let also causes its fair amount of hardship. The problem is more and more people- I know of two cases- are buying a second home to let as their 'retirement fund'. Not because they want to become landlors or to have a property portfolio, but because they feel that will be the only asset they'll have when they retire.

    Unless confidence in the pension system increases more and more people will go down that route I reckon.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    well kermit i'm just glad you're not setting government policy or i'd be screwed lol........truth is there should be more tax breaks for buy to let investors not less, and the government knows that's what's actually driving the economy at the minute, the reason people can't afford to buy houses, especially in london, is because they're doubling in price every 6 years or so, and obviously wages aren't so the average age for first time buyers will just keep going up........then you look at all the immigration from new EU countries and the simple fact is that they're not building enough affordable new housing, even all this shared ownership stuff is a bit crap imo. you get half a house, and pay rent on the other half. whoopee.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Fuck it. I'm gonna buy properties to let if I can afford it. I'm planning on having a job that doesn't pay regular wages so it's a requirement to have other regular income in case you don't get any work for a while.


    buy to let is technically a poor investment at the moment due to low yields, yes youll find tenants, but you wont make any real money on it
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Aladdin wrote:
    Buy to let also causes its fair amount of hardship. The problem is more and more people- I know of two cases- are buying a second home to let as their 'retirement fund'. Not because they want to become landlors or to have a property portfolio, but because they feel that will be the only asset they'll have when they retire.

    I just wish houses were for living in rather than fucking speculation and making more money.
    That's all I want one for. Just one, too :p

    A few (lot of) buy-to-let repos would help. Starting with that bint on the BBC.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    buy to let is technically a poor investment at the moment due to low yields, yes youll find tenants, but you wont make any real money on it

    are you sure about that now? ;) all depends where you buy and at the right price any house is a good deal, i'm close to sale agreed on a 7 bed property atm, lets just say if everything goes ahead best case scenario it'll be kicking out £10,000 positive cashflow annually, even worse case i'm looking at about 7-8k, i'd say technically that's a pretty good investment.......
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    And that's why its so important to stop it being a good investment.

    80% tax on income not profit should do the trick!

    And with all that juicy tax income we can give tax breaks to first time buyers in affordable housing.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    i don't get what you've got against the small time entrepeneurs, some people don't want to work 9-5 all their life, and if i'm prepared to take the risk, well then.........he who dares rodders! anyways, i am a first time buyer, so bring on those tax breaks :D
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Got nothing against people who work for a living.

    Landlords don't.

    More than once I've been tempted to fuck up the BTL remortgages I deal with.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Kermit wrote:
    Got nothing against people who work for a living.

    Landlords don't.

    More than once I've been tempted to fuck up the BTL remortgages I deal with.

    Neither do I, I happen to be one of them thanks, you can work hard all your life and still end up nowhere, you have to think with your head and work smart......landlords don't work ay, exactly what planet are you living on? You think it's not work to raise the capital, trek across london looking through hundreds of houses to find the right deal that stacks up, then to make an offer before someone else gets there, get a good broker/solicitor in place so the deal doesn't fall through, get a mortgage agreement, get the house, advertise the rooms, get the tenants in..........on top of a full time job? if you think it just falls out of the sky into your lap your raving bonkers.........i'm just glad you're not my solicitor lol. :p
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    You think it's not work to raise the capital

    That must be a lot of scrimping and saving!
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    buy to let is technically a poor investment at the moment due to low yields, yes youll find tenants, but you wont make any real money on it
    I wouldn't be wanting to make loads of money, just enough to put away to keep me going between jobs. If I wanted to make a profit I'd probably buy a holiday home (haha) in an area with low costs and high potential, like Croatia or somewhere.

    And I don't see how buying to let is somehow immoral. Okay if it's preventing people who need a home from buying, then obviously it's not desirable. But let's not forget that their are plenty of people out there who can't buy a house for non-financial reasons. What would you do if you worked all round the country on various contracts, and there were no flats to rent?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Lets just say that I work as a remortgaging conveyancer for a major BTL lender's panel solicitor. I would never screw up, but its amazing how non-BTL remortgages can so easily take priority.

    In many cases, I don't think they do work for capital. I see so many people remortgage their houses to free up equity that they only have because BTL buyers sent house prices through the roof.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I wouldn't be wanting to make loads of money, just enough to put away to keep me going between jobs.

    Landlord-hate aside ;) it's probably not a great idea for a short term money making scheme. In the very long term, they go up, but you need to be able to weather the peaks and troughs.

    But a low yield won't always cover the mortgate repayments (and the market, not your mortgage is likely to dictate them).

    Houses are ridiculously expensive at the moment. They won't necessarily continue to be. You'd be buggered if they fell considerably.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I think buy to let is a good move, I definately plan on doing it in the future when I can afford.

    Although I think Kermit has made some good points, I don't think that being a landlord isn't working.

    Think about all the shit you are responsible for, the whole running of the house e.g. plumbing, heating system etc. Also if you get non paying tenants or squatters you are fucked....

    The main reason I want to do it is to make a good secure future for my son, what's so wrong with that?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    What's wrong with it is that it prevents every bugger else's son from being able to get their foot on the ladder, and carve out their own security.

    The house price inflation has given more people the capital to buy a second home, and because of that the houses prices go up because everyone can afford to pay the stupid prices. That means most first time buyers are spending 30%-40% of their income on their mortgage, and many tenants are spending 30%-40% of the income on rent. That is bad for everyone, it creates instability and it creates a flawed economy.

    There's gonna be a crash, and I hope to God its only BTL owners who get clobbered.
  • Options
    SkiveSkive Posts: 15,286 Skive's The Limit
    It pisses me off.

    Where I live is favourite for Londoners buying up second homes. Now down the pub you get the local farmers at one end of the bar and the stuck up rich Londoners with their Jags and Range Rovers at the other. :(

    House prices round my way are obscene. The only good thing about that is that my inheritence is going to be pretty good.
    Weekender Offender 
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Kermit wrote:
    There's gonna be a crash, and I hope to God its only BTL owners who get clobbered.

    I think so.

    Even if you've bought at the top of the peak (whenever that is), then as an owner-occupier, you should be able to sit tight and pay the mortgage (even if interest rates rise and you've on a tracker/variable). They'll (house prices) go up again.
    You buy as a long term place to live.

    If you buy a BTL now, then you stand a pretty good chance of being buggered, as you can't really set an arbitrary rent just to cover the mortgage. If the market rate is less than the mortgage payment, then so be it.

    If you've having to subsidise the mortgage payment, and getting no capital appreciation on the rental property, then you're not in a particularly favourable position.

    I'm not sure how much of this makes sense when written down, as I've had a few Hoegaardens :yum: but I think the ideas make sense.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Kermit,

    BTL has been around for donkey's years, I have family members who have been doing it for 20-30 years and have been very fair landlords since not increasing the rent for 7 years so far !

    I don't see how BTL is to blame for the market, the market was screwed anyway, and the goverment should have done a lot more to stabilise it, i.e. raise the interest rates to stop people spending stupid money.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Every landlord I've had has been a robbing cunt, which does cloud my view somewhat.

    BTL has its place, some people don't want to buy, but the rise and rise of BTL has meant that house prices in popular cities are quite frankly obscene.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I don't think BTL is why the market prices are obscene. They are obscene for so many other factors.

    I do however concede that BTL is more than likely the reason why the market has KEPT it's value and not burst/dropped before now...

    So I guess I can see what you're saying
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    levesquez wrote:
    While some people have no home, or can not afford to buy their own home, is it justifiable for others to have two, or three...

    If you're that concerned why don't you campaign to get the tax laws changed to encourage developers to renovate old homes that lay abandoned.

    Where I live the developers are happy to take an old office block and turn them into flats because they can claim back tax breaks but if you want to take an old place that has been empty for years those same breaks don't apply.

    As it is in this country the number of people that buy homes rather then rent is much higher then in other countries.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Skive wrote:
    It pisses me off.

    Where I live is favourite for Londoners buying up second homes. Now down the pub you get the local farmers at one end of the bar and the stuck up rich Londoners with their Jags and Range Rovers at the other. :(

    House prices round my way are obscene. The only good thing about that is that my inheritence is going to be pretty good.

    please emphisise the RICH part of that ;)

    im a londoner and i hate the housing market as it is at the moment as its pointless to rent at current prices, and a mortgage is well out of my range for next 15 years at current goings

    house prices rising more than wages can only result in a big collapse, i believe the IMF recently dubbed the london/uk houseprices 30% overvalued
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    everyone loves a good asset bubble
Sign In or Register to comment.