Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.

The pictures you don't see

1356

Comments

  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    LacyMay wrote:
    Agreed.

    When you know fuck all about something it's better to keep your mouth shut, then to spout out a load of crap :thumb:
    If youre gonna give advice, its best if its something youve tried and tested yourself, which im not sure it is Lacy.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    and I am a pacifist, but self defense is different, but it seems to me, a big part of the army isnt even about self defense at all. Look at the last two wars, unless you want to attack someone, and then when they hit you back, and then you kill them, thats self defense?

    When they hit back at you, your defending yourself no matter who starts it. If you start a fight down the pub and some fella hits you, your going to try and defend youself even if it is hitting him back.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    When they hit back at you, your defending yourself no matter who starts it. If you start a fight down the pub and some fella hits you, your going to try and defend youself even if it is hitting him back.

    But that's not pacifism. pacifism is when some chap is beating the living shit out his girlfriend and you sit back and let it happen, but feel morally superior by telling the people who lay him out that 'violence isn't the way'
  • Teh_GerbilTeh_Gerbil Posts: 13,332 Born on Earth, Raised by The Mix
    Pacifism is a load of twaddle.

    And yes, Soldiers are good everyday blokes. And they drink hard, I tell you... and have great parties. :yippe:

    Soldiers, at the end of the day, do their job and do it well. Thing is in Iraq... they are trying to do someone ELSES job. That of the Police.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    NQA wrote:
    But that's not pacifism. pacifism is when some chap is beating the living shit out his girlfriend and you sit back and let it happen, but feel morally superior by telling the people who lay him out that 'violence isn't the way'
    now THATS a load of bollocks.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Teh_Gerbil wrote:
    Pacifism is a load of twaddle.

    And yes, Soldiers are good everyday blokes. And they drink hard, I tell you... and have great parties. :yippe:

    Soldiers, at the end of the day, do their job and do it well. Thing is in Iraq... they are trying to do someone ELSES job. That of the Police.
    I live in Colchester, a major Garrison town and home to the army jail. Yes they drink hard, and cause most of the trouble in the streets at night.
    My ex husband was an ex paratrooper and wilfully admits that they were encouraged to go out and have fights, its seen as part and parcel of it. maybe that was just his lot, but i very much doubt it.
    OK im sure some of them are nice blokes and are just doing their job guv, but thats not the side I see on a friday night walking through the town.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Pacifism is NEVER under any circumstances using violence ever! If you fight back, your not a pacifist at all.

    And soldiers are good blokes on the whole and are not encouraged to go out and cause trouble and disgrace themselves or their fellow soldiers who sign up to defend their nation and protect its citizens.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Pacifist is military related by definition... Not everyday life related...
    pac·i·fism Audio pronunciation of "pacifist" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (ps-fzm)
    n.

    1. The belief that disputes between nations should and can be settled peacefully.
    2.
    1. Opposition to war or violence as a means of resolving disputes.
    2. Such opposition demonstrated by refusal to participate in military action.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I didnt suggest soldiers sign up just to kill people, but they sign up being ok with the fact they might have to, which is why I could never do it, and why theyre not like me.
    They are trained to kill - deny that?
    Why is that senseless drivel?
    They are trained to kill, they have to have a certain mentality to want to go into the army in the first place.
    Of course they're trained for violent conflict - the British Army wouldn't be much good if its soldiers weren't trained to use weapons.

    The rest of your drivel is simply rhetoric. And not very impressive rhetoric at that.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    If youre gonna give advice, its best if its something youve tried and tested yourself, which im not sure it is Lacy.

    Oh yeah cos you've been in the army ain't ya :rolleyes:

    My dad was in the army for 23 years, my uncle has been in it for 20. I think i might know a little something having been brought up amongst them all for like 20 years.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    ...although, to be fair, its gonna make you biased too.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    ...although, to be fair, its gonna make you biased too.

    What me?
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    and I am a pacifist, but self defense is different, but it seems to me, a big part of the army isnt even about self defense at all. Look at the last two wars, unless you want to attack someone, and then when they hit you back, and then you kill them, thats self defense?

    There is not a single definition for pacifism.

    Some pacifists completely oppose any form of violence, they reject any notion of self-defence. Others accept the idea of self-defence but do not believe it extends to a community of people (a country). Then I think there are some people who call themselves biological/nuclear pacifists who oppose biological/nuclear warfare because of its indiscriminate effects. There's been others, particularly in the anti-war movement back during the Vietnam war who called themselves pacifists but had supported US involvement in WWII. Pacifism is a broad term really...

    Pacifism doesn't distinguish between good and bad and through failing to stop bad (e.g. Nazis) it's promoting bad...That said a lot of pacifists are Christians who've done a bit of picking and choosing from the Bible to reach a pacifist interpretation, mixed in with a naive belief that humans don't need to fight bad in the world but God will ensure good will somehow prevail. (I guess these people are unfamiliar with what happened in Rwanda and Auschwitz...)

    I've always thought really you have to be pretty immature and idealist (as well as historically and politically ignorant...and er out of touch with reality) to call yourself a pacifist. Hmm.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    LacyMay wrote:
    What me?

    Yes, you.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru


    I've always thought really you have to be pretty immature and idealist (as well as historically and politically ignorant...and er out of touch with reality) to call yourself a pacifist. Hmm.
    there are many intelectuals who are quakers ...i don't think these people are out of touch with realiuty.
    they make an informed choice and refuse to play your game ...to the point where many people would prefer to be jailed tortured and killed ...before playing this insane game.
    some people are imprisoned or killed for killing.
    some people end up in the same situation for refusing to kill.
    wheres the sanity?
    imagine two such men sharing a cell.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    Yes, you.

    Not really.

    I just thought she was wrong in what she was saying. No point making sweeping generalisations about a whole group of people just cos a couple of them fight when they're pissed.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    LacyMay wrote:
    Not really.

    I just thought she was wrong in what she was saying. No point making sweeping generalisations about a whole group of people just cos a couple of them fight when they're pissed.

    So the fact that you come from an army family isn't going to influence your view? I don't think so.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    So the fact that you come from an army family isn't going to influence your view? I don't think so.

    Nah not really. I only objected to her making out that everyone in the army is in it to kill people.

    I'm sure there are people that are nutters that join the army, but in my experience not all are like that.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    there are many intelectuals who are quakers ...i don't think these people are out of touch with realiuty.
    they make an informed choice and refuse to play your game ...to the point where many people would prefer to be jailed tortured and killed ...before playing this insane game.

    Perhaps, yeah. I have more respect really for a pacifist whose views are influenced by religious beliefs. I can respect that a lot more than someone who holds pacifist views with no real religious pretext because there's not really any secular justification for pacifism.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Perhaps, yeah. I have more respect really for a pacifist whose views are influenced by religious beliefs. I can respect that a lot more than someone who holds pacifist views with no real religious pretext because there's not really any secular justification for pacifism.

    of course there is, there's a suck thing called ethics and refusing to be involved in violence no matter the consequences, or reufising to support the military wherever possible
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    of course there is, there's a suck thing called ethics and refusing to be involved in violence no matter the consequences, or reufising to support the military wherever possible

    I don't see any justification there...

    With the exception of religious reasons relevant to some religious people there is imo no justification for say, opposing the Allied fight against Nazi Germany.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    the greenham common women ...some who lived in trees and holes in the ground for years ...were mostly not there from any religous comitment.
    many of these women were willing to go ...and many did ...to prison for peace by peacful means.
    i like to think they managed to retain their dignity all these years later.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I don't see any justification there...

    With the exception of religious reasons relevant to some religious people there is imo no justification for say, opposing the Allied fight against Nazi Germany.
    many did oppose it and went to jail ...not from a religous perspective.
    they would rather be a slave than kill another man.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    now THATS a load of bollocks.

    Seems like a perfectly good analogy to me...
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    many did oppose it and went to jail ...not from a religous perspective.
    they would rather be a slave than kill another man.

    And they'd rather than they kept their lily white consciences clean than kill to save another human.

    At the end of the day pacifism is not 'I won't kill to save myself', but 'My conscience is more important than the lives of others'. Sorry, I think that is a self-centred view and I have absolutely no respect for pacifists at all, religous or not.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    the greenham common women ...some who lived in trees and holes in the ground for years ...were mostly not there from any religous comitment.
    many of these women were willing to go ...and many did ...to prison for peace by peacful means.
    i like to think they managed to retain their dignity all these years later.

    Most of them weren't pacifists either - they were anti-nuclear which is different.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    NQA wrote:
    And they'd rather than they kept their lily white consciences clean than kill to save another human.

    At the end of the day pacifism is not 'I won't kill to save myself', but 'My conscience is more important than the lives of others'. Sorry, I think that is a self-centred view and I have absolutely no respect for pacifists at all, religous or not.

    they are obviously becoming an endangered species which i find quite alarming.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    OK im sure some of them are nice blokes and are just doing their job guv, but thats not the side I see on a friday night walking through the town.

    I bet they're the same as the boys on the way back from the union on a weds night. They're drunk blokes, they're all the same.

    Stop acting like you're better.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    they are obviously becoming an endangered species which i find quite alarming.

    Yep, when there's conscription on the cards and the only way to stop the Panzers rolling down the street is to risk getting yourself killed flying a spitfire or driving a Sherman tank the number of pacifists rockets up. Funny that :chin:
  • Teh_GerbilTeh_Gerbil Posts: 13,332 Born on Earth, Raised by The Mix
    NQA wrote:
    Yep, when there's conscription on the cards and the only way to stop the Panzers rolling down the street is to risk getting yourself killed flying a spitfire or driving a Sherman tank the number of pacifists rockets up. Funny that :chin:

    *apologies*

    But I have to say it... surley it'd be "killed flying a spitfire or driving a Churchill tank"

    :p But a very true statement, either way.
Sign In or Register to comment.