Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options

Definition of racism and descrimination...

2456

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Discrimination is treating people differently because of different attributes

    Racism is believing that your race (genes I guess) is superior or more deserving of favour than that of different races.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Aladdin wrote:
    Well I have always said that lines can be drawn.

    What gives you the right to determine where those lines are though?
    The ''they first came for xxx and I said nothing...'' saying does not apply as far as I am concern, because there is a fundamental difference between fascism, racism & homophobia and everything else. The former is simply an unnaceptable abomination. Anything else isn't.

    But that is just your opinion, surely? Why deny the right to an opinion to someone esle just becaue it differs from yours?
    They are a cancer that must be destroyed.

    But not in the way you are suggesting. They should be destroyed through persuasion, not violence.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    klintock wrote:
    Aladdin, saying that one set of views is unnacceptable and that you will use violence to stamp them out IS facism.

    So, looks like Al is a facist.

    :yes:

    It's a lovely irony isn't it?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    klintock wrote:
    Aladdin, saying that one set of views is unnacceptable and that you will use violence to stamp them out IS facism.

    So, looks like Al is a facist.

    Errr...no it isn't. I don't agree with Aladdin on this, but it ain't fascism.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    What gives you the right to determine where those lines are though?
    Common sense and basic human decency. I'm sure I'm not alone in that.


    But that is just your opinion, surely? Why deny the right to an opinion to someone esle just becaue it differs from yours?
    Because amongst other things they are offensive? It's basically the same as insulting someone and calling them names.


    No difference between calling someone a fucking this and that and saying people of certain race are by definition criminal/twisted/evil/etc. Is there?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Errr...no it isn't. I don't agree with Aladdin on this, but it ain't fascism.

    Yeah it is. You should stop looking at content and start looking at how things operate.

    Then you might see why I thik communism, socialism, monarchism, feudalism etc and all other forms of government are all cut from the exact same cloth.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    You really could do with reading some history...
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    You really could do with reading some history...

    You could do with doing some thinking. :rolleyes:

    in all those systems the common element is the violent domination of some by a few. The purpose changes, the takers and the stolen from swap places, but the fundamental methodology is exactly the same.

    It's this method that's the problem, not what you do once you are using it.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I'm wondering what you think fascism actually is? :confused:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I'm wondering what you think fascism actually is? :confused:

    All politics follows this pattern.

    1) The violence and threats used to make it happen

    2) The fraud that allows persuasive men and women to get others to be violent for them.

    As 1) is the problem and always will be, the reasons for 2) are quite immaterial. Unfortunately, 99% of political debate centres around what we should direct violence towards to achieve whatever preffered goals we have this week.

    Facism is identical to monarchism, feudalism, capitalism, democracy yadda yadda in employing this process. The groups influenced and attacked by the fraud changes according to the whims of those in charge of the fraud. The process does not.

    As this is the case, Al saying that person "x" should be stamped out, all that is happening is the same process, but with different players. That Al can't persuade others to get busy stomping is the only real difference.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    You haven't a clue then. Thought so.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    You haven't a clue then. Thought so.

    :confused:

    I was oretty detailed I thought. You find anything factually incorrect in my statements?

    No doubt you will want to waste your time looking at what fraud is being used and which groups are using it on which other groups, like it makes a gnat's chuff of difference.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Look - if you're gonna throw words like "fascist" around, it might be an idea to learn what they actually mean eh?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Klintock - an ideology is more than the means by which it gains power...come on FFS...
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Spliffie wrote:
    Klintock - an ideology is more than the means by which it gains power...come on FFS...

    ...and they don't gain power in the same ways. As it happens (yes, you guessed it), I can recommend a book on the subject...

    0141014326.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Look - if you're gonna throw words like "fascist" around, it might be an idea to learn what they actually mean eh?

    Look, I have told you that I don't see any difference between the fraud of "the divine right of kings" or the fraud of "the rule of law" and the frauds of nationalism (what nation? lunatics) or what have you. I see them as identical. They are one group using fraud to acquire violence to impose, rob murder (depnding on whim) and otherwise control another.

    Once you've decided that there's no legitimacy in one man having violent control over another, then there's no need to look for people's excuses for getting that control.
    Klintock - an ideology is more than the means by which it gains power...come on FFS...

    Not really. Ideology is oneof the marketing device used by men and women who want you to be their slave. The fraud may change it's names and characters but not much else does.
    ...and they don't gain power in the same ways. As it happens (yes, you guessed it), I can recommend a book on the subject...

    Yeah, they all follow the same principle. Without a bunch of people voluntarily ganging together to control others, they couldn't exist. The only way you can do this is through some sort of persuasion of that group.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    You only actually have one idea don't you klintock?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    klints right.
    it is something i've asked you about before blag ...like what will you do about people like me who don't want to be a part of your commune ...
    trouble is ...there are so many individuals and desires out there ...we have to have that violent control ...even in klint worlrd ...there would be a need for violence ...which i guess he already accepts.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    No, he isn't right. The point is, if you're going to use terms like fascist, you should have an understanding of what they mean. How different idealogies and political systems is wield and enforce power is different, they appeal to different people, different ideas and desires and are products of different circumstances.
    If you're going to discuss politics, it helps to know what you're on about.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    klints right.
    it is something i've asked you about before blag ...like what will you do about people like me who don't want to be a part of your commune ...

    Where have I ever mentioned communes? :confused:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    No, he isn't right. The point is, if you're going to use terms like fascist, you should have an understanding of what they mean. How different idealogies and political systems is wield and enforce power is different, they appeal to different people, different ideas and desires and are products of different circumstances.
    If you're going to discuss politics, it helps to know what you're on about.
    even i have that basic understanding!
    your missing the point mate.
    whatever system we put in place ...involves force to keep it running in thst manner.
    in kilint world or blag world ...you'll have to use force of some kind ...to maintain it.
    there is no way round that simple fact.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Self defence is needed. Dunno about force as you mean it. But what would you prefer? Force decided on and wielded from above without your say? or force decided on from below, by ordinary people, with your say?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    Self defence is needed. Dunno about force as you mean it. But what would you prefer? Force decided on and wielded from above without your say? or force decided on from below, by ordinary people, with your say?
    it can never be that simple .
    life is so complex and people and their desires even more so.
    how the hell ...do we ever achieve peace even?
    surely the desire of most men and women is to live in peace ...with whatever prosperity we can afford eacjh other.
    but even peace ...a simple desire ...seems unatainable.
    why?
    cos no matter what you want ...i want something else.
    is there realy anty way round that?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    The way I envisage society being organised, yes. You'd be free to live in Wales and do whatever it is you do. People would have control over their own lives and labour, rather than having to sell it to someone else in order to survive.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    How different idealogies and political systems is wield and enforce power is different, they appeal to different people, different ideas and desires and are products of different circumstances.

    Never said they didn't. Don't give a shit either.

    All i said was that they all operate in an identical fashion, save the players change and the groups on the "top" and the "bottom" differ. Other than that, all those political systems are identical. You've not addressed this point have you, though? Ever notice how when blagsta is stumped he asks a question?

    So facism is communism is democracy is monarchism is capitalism yadda yadda. Oh, they look different, they tell different lies to get their way, and they do different things once they have that violent control over individuals. So what? They are still identical in their fundamental methods, and so all the same.

    As the process is the problem, you can't do anything by organising politically along any lines whatsoever.

    So this -
    But what would you prefer? Force decided on and wielded from above without your say? or force decided on from below, by ordinary people, with your say?

    Misses the key point that whoever has the violence becomes the top. All you really have to do to make people's lives better is fuck all. Just don't interfere at all. I don't have the right to wander into your house and look through your stuff. So if me and you and 100,000 other people band together and give ourselves a group name, we don't have that right either.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote:
    or force decided on from below, by ordinary people, ?
    force is violence ...and what if it aint with my say or a few million other peoples say ...it's still force.
    it doesn;t matter to me wether the the force comes from above or below ...whatever that may mean ...it's still force.
    the last thing i need right now is ...some fucking shite estate with burnt out cars and kids ,,,burnt out finances and and id on't give a shit about peple who own their own house ...fuck the self employed ...telling me ...how i should arrange my life and my finances.
    so ...someone is going to have to use vilolence.
    i'm for a high tax economy ...unlike klint ...but i aint for being pudhed around ...much more than i already am being.
    your going to have to use force ...from the bottom ...to move me ...and god hel- us all.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Aladdin wrote:
    Common sense and basic human decency. I'm sure I'm not alone in that.

    You aren't. But what is common sense to you isn't necessarily common sense to someone else. Just because a majority believe something, does that make is true?

    As for basic human decency, I don't disagree that it is decent to treat people equally., but your are not doing that.

    You are treating, or advocating treatment, which is different because of a person's belief. It actually makes you little different to them.
    Because amongst other things they are offensive? It's basically the same as insulting someone and calling them names.

    No difference between calling someone a fucking this and that and saying people of certain race are by definition criminal/twisted/evil/etc. Is there?

    It's your opinion that it is offensive. But not of the person making the comments. Who's right? You'd be surprised what can cause offence to some people, it's a subjective issue... does that mean that everytime you cause offense then you should be subjected to the same remedy that you suggest for racists?

    What you advocate is the forcing of your opinion and view on life on someone else, against their will. How does that make you different from the BNP?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    @ Blagsta.

    Fasicm is oppressive dictatorial control, including censorship and suppression of opponents.

    Please explain how violence against someone because of their beliefs does not fall into that category.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Yup.. For once I agree with what Blagsta's saying...

    Learn what something means before using it. Fascism is a strong word.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    force is violence ...and what if it aint with my say or a few million other peoples say ...it's still force.
    it doesn;t matter to me wether the the force comes from above or below ...whatever that may mean ...it's still force.
    the last thing i need right now is ...some fucking shite estate with burnt out cars and kids ,,,burnt out finances and and id on't give a shit about peple who own their own house ...fuck the self employed ...telling me ...how i should arrange my life and my finances.
    so ...someone is going to have to use vilolence.
    i'm for a high tax economy ...unlike klint ...but i aint for being pudhed around ...much more than i already am being.
    your going to have to use force ...from the bottom ...to move me ...and god hel- us all.

    But the society we live in already employs violence and the threat of violence to enforce its laws and to keep it running. You seem to be Ok with that though, for some reason. And what are you going on about estates and burnt out cars for? :confused::confused:
Sign In or Register to comment.