Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options

What alternative is there to terrorism?

2»

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Just because Afghan civilians are being killed accidentally it does not make it morally acceptable.
    I disagree with you,you say that the West will not accept civillian deaths yet the the war against terrorism(or TWAT) has recieved mass support from the public!
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Toadborg,

    You seem to have come into this discussion and turned it into something totally different.

    Ive never said that killing civilians through any means was 'morally acceptable'. There is however, a matter of intent.

    If I stab you in the head with intent to kill you then that is seen as a lot more serious than if I accidentally stab you in the head while chopping carrots. Even in our legal system, one is called murder, the other possibly manslaughter.
    I disagree with you,you say that the West will not accept civillian deaths yet the the war against terrorism(or TWAT) has recieved mass support from the public!

    I actually said large numbers of civilian casualties. IE, the results of firebombing a city etc.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Thanatos jr

    Oh and the whole US support of 3 billion dollars. That comes from private donations from wealthy Jewish people in the US. And if it wasn't for Israel our new F-22 Raptor wouldn't be in exitstance. And niether would the F-117 or the B-2. That's write most of the technology in our most advanced birds comes from the Jews. Speaking of that I have to give a shout out to the British, thanks for the Harrier, it's a great plane and the Marine Corps wouldn't be the same without it.

    The 3 billion dollars is not from private individuals, that is the value of all the US assistance to the state of Israel. Israel is the number 1 recipient of US foreign aid.

    Secondly, I don't know about the F-22, but the tech to make the F-117 and the B-2 came from the Russians. A Russian physicist was allowed (God knows why) to publish a paper that explained the mathematical formula used to calculate the reflection of radio waves off of angled surfaces. The US saw the value of this and used it to make the 117. Because it only explained reflection off angles, we used computers to calculate reflections off of curves and then built the B-2.
    Well lets see, if you take a look at real history (long before WW1, some of you don't seem to think that exists but it does) you would see that the Jewish people were taken from there homes in Cannan (or modern Israel for you non history types) by many empires (most notably the Romans) and so after the holocaust the Western powers set up a small portion of land in palistine (same place as cannan) and formed a country of Israel (there were already many Jewish people there)So on the dawn of the first day of the nation of Israel, Arab forces attacked and tried to finish what Hitler couldn't. If it wasn't for our support the Jewish population would be gone forever. In the midst of this war the Jewish people gained more land. Every time the nation of Israel has grown in size it has been because the Arabs have attacked it. I'm not saying everything they do is good but stop sounding like anti-semites please.

    Finally,
    Who says that history should have anything to do with restoring people to their original homeland? Last time I checked, there used to be a country called Kurdistan that existed until much more recently than ancient Israel, whose territory and people were spliit up among Iran and Iraq and haven't had any success in getting it back, despite the horrible treatment the Kurds recieve from those two countries.

    The Palestinians have lived in Palestine, later Israel, for thousands of years, their claim to the land is no worse than that of the Jewish people.

    Oh, by the way, the comments made by me and some of the others in this thread are not anti-Semitic. We have a problem with the Israeli government, who is as responsible for this situation, and practices discrimination against the Palestinians as well as Israeli Arabs as the Palestinians. I am one quarter Jewish, so it would be pretty hard for me to be anti-Semitic. The equivalent situation in the US would be if Guatemala invaded us through Mexico, we fought them off and chased them back into Guatemala, and then occupied Mexico for 40 years.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    LondonGurl go and stop talking so much pish
    BUT because america is a suoerpower other countries have no way of fighting back - they have little choice but to fight dirty.So guys, What else can they do to fight back? null

    Are you saying they have a right to fight the americans at all, just because of the way america works. If I hate you in the way you do things, does that give me a right to find you and kill you????? Hmmmm I wonder what the answer would be to that!!
    anyway how do you know what they wanna do to us? - and surely rather than killing them if they dont like us we could just fine out what the problem is & negotiate!!??

    With the fact that they fly planes into buildings to kill people and also hold guns to hostages heads!! And these things dont give you an idea as into what they want to do to the USA, are you thick?????? Do you think there trying to show us that they want to be friends with us????? Hmmmm another tricky one <IMG alt="image" SRC="rolleyes.gif" border="0">
    THEY ARE NOT JUST RANDOM EVIL PEOPLE THAT ARE KILLING FOR NO REASON. THEY HAVE EXTREMELY SERIOUS GREVIANCES - KILLING THEM OR PUTTING THEM IN PRISON OR BOMBING THEM WONT MAKE THEM GO AWAY - THERE ARE SO MANY OTHER PEOPLE WHO HAVE HTE SAME GREVIANCES AND AMERICA CANT INPRISON ALL OF THEM - THIS IS JUST A SHORT TERM SOLUTION.

    So this gave these people a right to board a plane full of innocent people, hi-jack it(and also stab some stewards)then fly the plane into a building killing more innocent people just because they had greviances?!?!

    Hey has anyone got a plane I could borrow, I have some greviances that I want to sort out??? Anyone......I really need one........anyone.......please?! <IMG alt="image" SRC="rolleyes.gif" border="0"> <IMG alt="image" SRC="rolleyes.gif" border="0">

    Open your eyes and sort your brain out as it seems you have some serious crossing of wires in that head of yours.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Just before you think anything about this reply Whowhere am not being cheeky.
    Imagine during the cold war, there are a couple of battallions of British troops in Germany. They find out that every major city in Britain has been destroyed. They have no way of getting home, and just over the horizon they will come across soviet territory. What would you do??

    The brittish were never on the east side of germany during the war. They were on the west with the other allies fighting the germans and they never got even close to the center as they let the soviets take berlin due to what the germans did you the soviet people. The soviets were on the east fighting the other german forces.

    When you say cold war, is that the battle of the germans and soviets when hitler decided to invade the cossacks but didnt make it in time before winter came and half of the german army turned into ice lollies because they didnt have the right protection??. Or are you getting confused with the cold war of america and the soviets which the brits never really had much of a part to do with it nor germany as the cold war was in cuba or whereever as that was where the soviets had there shiny missles and the yanks didnt like that at all??

    That we paragraph is very confusing?? <IMG alt="image" SRC="confused.gif" border="0"> <IMG alt="image" SRC="confused.gif" border="0">
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by wuckfit:
    <STRONG>LondonGurl go and stop talking so much pish



    So this gave these people a right to board a plane full of innocent people, hi-jack it(and also stab some stewards)then fly the plane into a building killing more innocent people just because they had greviances?!?!


    Hey has anyone got a plane I could borrow, I have some greviances that I want to sort out??? Anyone......I really need one........anyone.......please?! <IMG alt="image" SRC="rolleyes.gif" border="0"> <IMG alt="image" SRC="rolleyes.gif" border="0">

    Open your eyes and sort your brain out as it seems you have some serious crossing of wires in that head of yours.</STRONG>

    I didnt say it gives them the right to do anythign - but who gives people rights anyway? you? AMerica has issues with countries over things and they seem to have given themselves "the rights" to take action that they see reasonable.

    your the one with serious crossings of wires. your twisting my words.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by LondonGurl:
    [QB]

    I didnt say it gives them the right to do anythign - but who gives people rights anyway? you? AMerica has issues with countries over things and they seem to have given themselves "the rights" to take action that they see reasonable.

    They seem to think they have these "rights" to do that but what they think and what is reality are 2 different things.

    In any case Id say America has been within her "rights" in responding to the attacks and detaining their footsoldiers. You lose whatever "rights" you have when you kill innocent civilians.

    Had it been a legit military target, the attack would have at least had some honor but no - they choose to attack unarmed civilians and unaware military personnel in office buildings!

    These "people" represent the absolute lowest in humanity and I for one revel in their elimination.

    Whatever issues they had with us are now inconsequential. They lost their "right" to be respected and deserve every last death inflicted upon their pathetic cause.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by LondonGurl:
    <STRONG>

    I didnt say it gives them the right to do anythign - but who gives people rights anyway? you? AMerica has issues with countries over things and they seem to have given themselves "the rights" to take action that they see reasonable.

    your the one with serious crossings of wires. your twisting my words.</STRONG>

    MUCH you have to learn, and hopefully, you will absorb a portion of it when you grow up.

    As a child, you have not yet been in a position of responsibility to direct your own life, much less anyone elses. You have not experienced the consequences of "opening a dialogue" when an armed response is mandatory. "Mandatory???" Klinton did the naive and childish (pc translation from COWARDLY) thing and just closed his eyes and pretended the naughty boys would just stop acting out if he ignored them.
    If you were conversive with current events, then you would understand what "jihad" means... and to THOSE people, it means the murder of ALL Americans. To refrain from taking it to the antagonist is allow them to continue to escalate their "jihad" until the US is eliminated.
    Like it or not, it IS in your PERSONAL best interest for the US to continue to exist. What do you think the consequences to UK would be if the US fell???
    While you may very well believe that the act of defending yourself is vulgar, the reality is that if you do not value yourself sufficient to defend yourself, then you certainly HAVE demonstrated your value to the world around you.
    Perhaps you WOULD enjoy life as a female in a Muslim world... <IMG alt="image" SRC="wink.gif" border="0"> Enjoy their "fashions"? Ready to queue up for the manditory female circumcision/mutilation? How about being publicly caned to death for a perceived infraction, tried/judged/sentenced/executed by one of the "defenders of the faith" who witnessed you exposing your ankle in public??? <IMG alt="image" SRC="eek.gif" border="0"> Ready to become a chatel? (Oops, I forgot... talking to "subjects", as opposed to citizens <IMG alt="image" SRC="wink.gif" border="0"> ) Perhaps you really DO need a tour of Kabul to comprehend the pertinent issues...

    Me? Naw... don't need to see Kabul. Saw enough in Quang Tri and Khe Sanh to understand the issues... <IMG alt="image" SRC="wink.gif" border="0">

    [ 01-02-2002: Message edited by: Thanatos...AGAIN ]
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by wuckfit:
    <STRONG>Just before you think anything about this reply Whowhere am not being cheeky.



    The brittish were never on the east side of germany during the war. They were on the west with the other allies fighting the germans and they never got even close to the center as they let the soviets take berlin due to what the germans did you the soviet people. The soviets were on the east fighting the other german forces.

    When you say cold war, is that the battle of the germans and soviets when hitler decided to invade the cossacks but didnt make it in time before winter came and half of the german army turned into ice lollies because they didnt have the right protection??. Or are you getting confused with the cold war of america and the soviets which the brits never really had much of a part to do with it nor germany as the cold war was in cuba or whereever as that was where the soviets had there shiny missles and the yanks didnt like that at all??

    That we paragraph is very confusing?? <IMG alt="image" SRC="confused.gif" border="0"> <IMG alt="image" SRC="confused.gif" border="0"></STRONG>


    Yes, but after the second world war, Britain, France and America all had garrisons of occupying troops based in West Germany. Brtain had an active RAF base there until a couple of years ago.
    The cold war I am talking about is the 40 or so years from 1945 to 1989 when russia and the US were engaged in an arms race. During this time Britain had a large garrison of troops in Germany;soldiers, tanks, fighter aircraft. That is the example I was thinkig of. Answer your question for you?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Answer your question for you?

    Cheers, very well answered. I knew about the cold war with USA and russia but I didnt know that garrisons were in germany.

    Thanks anyway, you learn something new all the time when you on thesite <IMG alt="image" SRC="biggrin.gif" border="0"> <IMG alt="image" SRC="biggrin.gif" border="0"> <IMG alt="image" SRC="biggrin.gif" border="0">
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    We still have large numbers of troops based in Germany, as do the Americans.

    Germany was the front line of the cold war. That was where the hordes of Soviet tanks were supposed to be stopped before they could take over the rest of western Europe.
Sign In or Register to comment.