If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options
Police Name PC Murderers
Former Member
Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
---
0
Former Member
Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
Comments
okkk
I also can't say I'm too surprised that the police ignored warnings about the gang.
Oh and "harmless unarmed bobby"? Tell that to Jean Charles de Menezes' family.
P.S.
What is "British culture"? and how does one "dilute" it?
Aaaaah, like Dixon of Dock Green. Got ya. You have a fictionalised view of the past.
Don't use words you don't understand.
The police have always been "officers of the state".
Act of union creating the united kingdom was in 1707, last amended in 1941 to change the nature of the kingdom into a nation state.
And in the film which Dixon's first appeared he was shot dead by Dirk Bogarde.
Of course not.
No mention of the last armed robbery in a Bradford travel agents, which was performed by two white men from Buttershaw estate.
Aaaah, an uncheckable source. How convenient. There's no reference on the net or in any history books.
1949, in fact.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_subject#Loss_of_British_subject_status
Before then everyone's legal status was that of a "subject", that is within the feudal system, a person who owes a duty of allegience in exchange for protection from the monarch or his/her agents.
After that almost everyone's legal status became more or less the same, except the allegience was to the "state" instead. Isn't law fun?
God I thought that shit died out in the late medieval years.
Although of course, what you are now claiming is completely different to what you originally claimed and has nothign at all to do with Britain being a nation state. You're a fraud and a liar klintock.
It actually means nothing at all. Klintock is talking out of his arse as usual.
I got the date wrong. That is all. Even the "state" itself doesn't claim to be a "nation state", it's a state made up of several nations. The link between the nations was that the monarch was the same for all of them.
Well, naturally. You missed charlatan, too. Of course I could be the greatest liar that ever lived, my statements are either true or false on their own merits. Logic really isn't your strong point. In this case, the statement is true.
It was a monarchy, now it's a state. A state (in law) is a body politic made up of citizens that owe allegience to the state in exchange for protection. A monarchy is exactly the same but the allegience is owed to just one person, the monarch.
In both cases, it's a contractual relationship. As the"state" isn't doing it's side of things i.e. protecting anybody then there is no relationship, hence no citizens or state.
http://alt-usage-english.org/whatistheuk.html