If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options
Essential support for under 25s
Essential support for under 25s
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
Show me one single thing that I've 'invented' or take that remark back.
I await your apology...
Btw, before you reference the obvious, I did not invent this:
You were the one who said your girlfriend could be pretty sure you weren't gay. From that it's a perfectly reasonable inference that your relationship is not wholly platonic. Sex outside marriage is proscribed, you're doing it - QED, really.
You, however, ran out of places to hide in a long, long time ago.
It doesn't imply that he has sex with her at all. You are implying that you are homosexual if you don't have sex with your girlfriend, which is a bit offensive if you ask me.
That is not what I was implying at all. If you had bothered to read the previous few posts, you would have noticed that it is not me who made insinuations about RK's sexuality, which is a very low debating tactic IMHO. All I did was to point out that, assuming RK's relationship is sexual (which he himself hinted it was), then he is having sex outside marriage and therefore, from a Christian point of view, not really in any position to criticise others' sexual antics.
Judge not, lest ye shall be judged...
His views may be sometimes barking but he deserves the same courtesey as everyone else in not having his views misrepresented
I did say I'd made an assumption - albeit in my judgement a reaosnable one - and pointed out what it was. If RK wishes, he's welcome to tell me that assumption was wrong and I will gladly withdraw the comments I made on the basis of it.
He could extend me the same courtesy and apologise for accusing me of inventing things.
Unless he took the "you don't get many of those to the pound" a bit to literally.......
You said I 'usually' do, so it can't be all that hard to find an example can it?
YOU are as guilty of smear and misrepresentation - not to mention slander - as anyone you accuse of them.
"when you're making the beast with two backs with someone you aren't married to?"
implying I'm having sex in an unmarried situation. YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT ME!
Elsewhere you refer to me as "pig-ignorant, hypocritical, with ill-thought out views ......"
Now perhaps you'll undersatnd why I won't apologise to you. In afct you genuinely disappoint me Ibex because I had you down as a more sensible contributor than most.
You hinted at a sexual relationship. Obviously I don't know for certain whether that's true or not, and if I misread what you posted then I apologise, but I still think my assumption was reasonable given the circumstances.
I didn't. You misrepresent me. I said you had ignorant, ill-thought-out views. there's a difference.
My comments were a response to what I've seen of your views on here, and no more. You're not usaully slow to denounce others' opinions, but you take umbrage when others do it to you. If you can't take it...
I'm flattered...