If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
I was referring to the tendancy of Marxists to insist that the people are acting in the 'wrong' way in order to explain the failings of Marxism/Leninism as a societal model.
Hmmmm. By "free trade" people normally mean neo-liberalist capitalism, with no state run social services, everything privatised and run for profit.
I'd agree. But then I'm not a Marxist/Leninist.
true or not, i think the system we have is awful but until you give me a better alternative, i'll be happy enough.
Do they? They'd be wrong then. For ex, look at 19th Century history, and the free trade/protectionism debate in the UK. 'Free trade' means just what it says on the tin, neo-liberalist capitalism, means neo-liberalist capitalism. In fact the neo-liberal, IMF model is particularly awful because, as I said it insists upon free trade, privatising all state property and an open market in the developing world as a condition of World Bank/IMF loans, but allows the developed world to protect their own markets, and have a social security/public sector network.
<me too>
Absolutely! It's not great, but it's certainly the least worst, and it *has* produced the highest standard of living for the greatest number of any system we've tried.