If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
People have been sentenced to less time in prison for running people down, that's all I'm saying.
That judge should be jailed for fifteen years for being such a twat.
Oh, shut up about paedophiles. Please, it is tiring and boring.
i know some judges are what many consider to be lenient on paedo's, but the end of the day the only reason they get away with it is because the sentencing laws are fooked up, that is what needs sorting
No, it's not true.
Or maybe it is, it depends on what you define as "paedo".
In Teeside a bit ago there was a person who downloaded loads of child pornography, and was only given a rehabilitation order. The reason? He was 13, and just wanted to look at pictures of his peers.
Is he a "paedo"?
So a 13 year old wanting to see pictures of a 13 year old is wrong is it, and will make him into filthy scum when he is older?
Does that mean any adult who looks at pornographic images of his or her peers is filthy scum?
what someone who lok at porn of people their own age?
im sure with the right guidance he'll grow up to see peers his own age in a sexual way
so the order was correct
Kentish, if you ever looked at a girl when you were 13 in a manner of fancying em, then you needed help according to you
You mean lukesh.
I fancied anything in a skirt when I was 13. Holidays in Scotland were never the same. :eek:
GOOD POINT, however people still missing point when comparring this case as has been done within this thread.
this was treason against the queen and the crown, however it was rather too harsh.