If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Options
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
No I didn't see it.
if you looked over your posts on this board or anyone else was to check them out ...big changes!
i hope your thinking of making a carear out of it.
I've lived for 21 years and come across very few non decent police officers.
maybe you should try to avoid having so many 'dealings' with them in the future.
The police are making more effort than ever to stamp out institutional racism, this kind of thing takes years to solve, not months, no matter how much effort is put in.
You have no idea what I mean by 'dealings' so who says I can avoid them. I don't mean that I've been in trouble with the police either.
Some forces also have tasers.
Only as a pilot, and they are only used by officers who are already armed.
Strikes me as pointless, considering they already have guns.
If you already have access to a firearm then a taser is a poor substitute.
That does seem pretty pointless then
I don't think there's anything wrong with shooting someone waving a gun at people.
Others disagree.
Depends whether you mean shooting to kill or just shooting to disarm him.
bit late, i get what your saying overall, but what do you mean they police with the consent of people whilst in usa they dont
If they are waving a gun around then shooting to disarm is what would be used. If they have a hostage and have the gun pointed at them or are pointing the gun at police then they should shoot to kill.
I think she meant whether to use a tazer or not. Tazers can also be used when someone is armed with a knife or other non-projectile but dangerous weapon.
No I meant, whether they'd be shooting at them to disarm or to kill.