Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options

The Catholic Church blackmails the government on gay rights

Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor has denied trying to blackmail ministers over laws on adoption by gay couples.
He said: "I'm not blackmailing anybody. I am just saying to the government the possible consequences of carrying through these particular regulations."

The head of the Catholic Church in England and Wales says, if bound by the laws, his adoption agencies will close.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6292315.stm

That's right. Let's close adoption agencies and deprive children from long term adopting parents for as long as it takes, rather than giving them to evil homosexuals.

Very Christian and charitable of you, mate. :rolleyes:

Judging by this threat, if anyone is not fit to care after children is the Catholic Church, rather than loving homosexual couples. I can see who has the best interest of the child at heart and who doesn't...
Beep boop. I'm a bot.
«13456711

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Remember, it's ungodlike to not stick their noses in at every turn.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Aladdin wrote: »
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6292315.stm

    That's right. Let's close adoption agencies and deprive children from long term adopting parents for as long as it takes, rather than giving them to evil homosexuals.

    Very Christian and charitable of you, mate. :rolleyes:

    Judging by this threat, if anyone is not fit to care after children is the Catholic Church, rather than loving homosexual couples. I can see who has the best interest of the child at heart and who doesn't...

    No the Catholic Church thinks its okay to be Christian and charitable when it suits them, not when it goes agaisnt there core beliefs.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I am going to burn in hell, I'm a catholic and I really hate everything it stands for and has ever done. This is despicable. A loving home is a loving home, so what if it isn't made up of a woman and a man, the child won't be any more or less loved.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Aladdin wrote: »
    I can see who has the best interest of the child at heart and who doesn't...

    To be fair, I think that their argument is that the best interests of the child is not with homosexual couples.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    But why? Because God disapprove of homosexuals? Because they believe the child might be abused by the adopting parents? Or because they are concerned of the possible social repercussions of being raised by same-sex parents?

    Even though I disagree with those who say gay couples should not be allowed to adopt because the child might get bullied, at least their argument has a logic. Blocking someone out because a passage or two in the Bible says they are wrong 'uns is not only wrong but without logic. According to the Bible we are all sinners. We are all imperfect. Therefore the Catholic Church should not consider anyone at all for adoption.

    It all boils down to homophobia and bigotry masquerading as religious beliefs.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    The Catholic adoption agencies place children with what they find to be suitable parents. That's them practising their faith and living by the standards their faith sets.

    I can't see why every adoption agency should be forced to take everyone, in fact a reasonable amount of specialism could be a good thing. As long as everyone has the opportunity with some agencies to be considered as a candidate for adopting, they don't need to have that right with every single agency.

    Think of the outcry there would be in the government tried to oppress other faith organisations, I think part of this picking on the Catholic Curch is because it's an easy target that few defend.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Think of the outcry there would be in the government tried to oppress other faith organisations,


    How is it oppressing them? :confused:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Aladdin wrote: »
    It all boils down to homophobia and bigotry masquerading as religious beliefs.

    Other way around, it's religion being seen as homophobia. Understandably so.

    Remember homosexuality is seen is totally against God's wishes and the Catholic Church "doesn't" condone homosexuality in any form (apart from covering uop the excesses of it's own priests ;) ) and they would view placing a child with a same sex couple as morally bankrupt. It's the opposite of what you believe.

    I can't see where they are coming from. I disagree wit hthem but it is completely in keeping with their teachings - just as their view on condoms are - and you cannot condemn someone for being true to their principles.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Why should religion get special treatment?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Just to clarify, the Catholic Church (generally) has no problem with homosexuality as such, just it's actions. In its eyes celibate homosexuals are just fine (although not as a 'family' in their sense for adoption).

    It's oppressing them because it's saying that they can't practise their faith and follows its teachings when trying to look after children.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Other way around, it's religion being seen as homophobia. Understandably so.

    Remember homosexuality is seen is totally against God's wishes and the Catholic Church "doesn't" condone homosexuality in any form (apart from covering uop the excesses of it's own priests ;) ) and they would view placing a child with a same sex couple as morally bankrupt. It's the opposite of what you believe.

    I can't see where they are coming from. I disagree wit hthem but it is completely in keeping with their teachings - just as their view on condoms are - and you cannot condemn someone for being true to their principles.
    In that case they are clearly not fit to run adoption agencies are they?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Just to clarify, the Catholic Church (generally) has no problem with homosexuality as such, just it's actions. In its eyes celibate homosexuals are just fine (although not as a 'family' in their sense for adoption).

    It's oppressing them because it's saying that they can't practise their faith and follows its teachings when trying to look after children.

    Why should religion get special treatment?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote: »
    Why should religion get special treatment?

    Why should sexuality get special treatment, or anything for that matter?

    At the moment the right to practise a religion is an enshrined right. If that changes then this would be a different discussion.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Why should sexuality get special treatment, or anything for that matter?

    How is sexuality getting special treatment here?
    At the moment the right to practise a religion is an enshrined right. If that changes then this would be a different discussion.

    Who is stopping anyone practise their religion?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Aladdin wrote: »
    In that case they are clearly not fit to run adoption agencies are they?

    Based on your morals, no. Based on theirs, yes.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Aladdin wrote: »
    In that case they are clearly not fit to run adoption agencies are they?

    They do a pretty good job of it, see if you can find some successful placement statistics for them vs local authorities.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Based on your morals, no. Based on theirs, yes.

    Whatever their morals, surely they're not above the law?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote: »
    How is sexuality getting special treatment here?

    Who is stopping anyone practise their religion?

    By forcing the Catholics arranging placements to accept Gay candidates then you are stopping them from practising their religion.

    Sexuality is getting special treatment because this is saying that the religious principles of specific agencies are less important than homosexuals having the option to adopt from every single adoption agency.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote: »
    Whatever their morals, surely they're not above the law?

    No, but one has to question the morals of a Govt which creates a law like this. Why shouldn't any adoption agency have the right to refuse placements for whatever reason they choose?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote: »
    Whatever their morals, surely they're not above the law?

    It's not law yet.

    For the last 20 years Catholic adoption agencies have been approached by homosexual couples interested in adoption. They have been provided with very good and impartial information and if the couple decide to persue things further they are put in touch with a suitable agency.

    Now that seems to work fine, why force a change?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    By forcing the Catholics arranging placements to accept Gay candidates then you are stopping them from practising their religion.

    Don't be absurd. How is it stopping them going to church, reading the Bible, believing in God?
    Sexuality is getting special treatment because this is saying that the religious principles of specific agencies are less important than homosexuals having the option to adopt from every single adoption agency.

    Well religion is less important. Religion is a choice, a belief system. Sexuality isn't.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    No, but one has to question the morals of a Govt which creates a law like this. Why shouldn't any adoption agency have the right to refuse placements for whatever reason they choose?

    Because that then opens the system up to abuse.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    It's not law yet.

    For the last 20 years Catholic adoption agencies have been approached by homosexual couples interested in adoption. They have been provided with very good and impartial information and if the couple decide to persue things further they are put in touch with a suitable agency.

    Now that seems to work fine, why force a change?

    Why should religion get special treatment? Should an adoption agency be allowed to refuse couples on the grounds of race?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote: »
    Don't be absurd. How is it stopping them going to church, reading the Bible, believing in God?

    Well religion is less important. Religion is a choice, a belief system. Sexuality isn't.

    There is more to religion and a faith than that, and many would argue with your statement that religion is a choice. There are plenty of people who feel it's an intrinsic part of them that can't be changed.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    There is more to religion and a faith than that, and many would argue with your statement that religion is a choice. There are plenty of people who feel it's an intrinsic part of them that can't be changed.

    I'm aware of how religion is bound up with identity and culture. However, religion is a choice. People change religions all the time. The same can't be said for sexuality.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote: »
    Because that then opens the system up to abuse.

    Sections of it, not the whole adoption process. Besides don't agencies make moral decisions every day?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote: »
    Why should religion get special treatment? Should an adoption agency be allowed to refuse couples on the grounds of race?

    Why not, if they feel it's in the best interests of the children they are placing. At the end of the day that is what matters. Make rules for the local authority agencies by all means, but then let the 'specialist' agencies do their thing.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Blagsta wrote: »
    I'm aware of how religion is bound up with identity and culture. However, religion is a choice. People change religions all the time. The same can't be said for sexuality.

    To you maybe, to others no.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I may not agree with the Catholic church on most things but I say that their agencies should be allowed to choose adopting parents on their basis under their rules.
    This is the same with any agency that spans the entire board. Housing agencies pick people for certain houses based on certain criteria.
    This is no different with adoption agencies. And it may seem outdated that the Catholic church denies the right for Homosexual couples to adopt children from their agencies but that is because it is not allowed under Catholic dogmatic law laid down by the Vatican. This is hundred's of years old.
    Put the shoe on the other foot here for a second.
    You are a member of a group of Homosexuals running an adoption agency. Can you honestly say that you would let a Catholic couple adopt a child if you knew they would teach that child that Homosexuality is wrong?
    Answer= No you wouldn't because that would go against what you stand for. These are your morals and beliefs.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Sections of it, not the whole adoption process. Besides don't agencies make moral decisions every day?

    If its OK to discriminate on grounds of sexuality, is it then also OK to discriminate on grounds of race?
Sign In or Register to comment.