Home Drink & Drugs
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options

Small ecstasy use 'harms brain'

Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
Even small amounts of the illegal drug ecstasy can be harmful to the brains of first time users, researchers say.

The University of Amsterdam team took brain scans and carried out memory tests on 188 people with no history of ecstasy use but at risk in the future.

They repeated the tests 18 months later, and found for the 59 people who had used ecstasy there was evidence of decreased blood flow and memory loss.

Long-term ecstasy use is already known to be harmful.

The class A drug is used by about 500,000 people in the UK, mostly on the club scene.

We know long-term use has a lasting impact so it makes sense that damage starts as soon as someone starts to use the drug
Dr Fabrizio Schifano, of the University of Hertfordshire

Lead researcher Maartje de Win said: "We do not know if these effects are transient or permanent.

"Therefore, we cannot conclude that ecstasy, even in small doses, is safe for the brain, and people should be informed of this risk."

Research has shown that long-term or heavy ecstasy use can damage neurons and cause depression, anxiety, confusion, difficulty sleeping and decrease memory.

However, no previous studies have looked at the side-effects of low doses of the drug on first time users.

The study, presented to the annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America, said there was no evidence of damage to the neurons or alteration to mood and it was unclear whether the effect of early use of the drug was permanent.

Blood provides the brain with energy, and decreased flow can lead to memory loss and attention problems.

Of the people who were tested who had taken ecstasy, the average use was six tablets.

Dr Fabrizio Schifano, professor of pharmacology at the University of Hertfordshire, said it was clear that early use of the drug did have some effect, but what there was not a consensus on was how long that would last.

He said: "We know long-term use has a lasting impact, so it makes sense that damage starts as soon as someone starts to use the drug.

"But we cannot say exactly how much damage is sustained at the start and need more research to be categorical about this."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6190538.stm

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    my memory was wrecked by alcohol well before taking Es.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    lipsy wrote:
    my memory was wrecked by alcohol well before taking Es.

    :lol: Exactly! If the Pills don't get you then the Weed and the Booze will!
    There's no escape for any of our brains, so fuck it, let's all go and get mashed... :D :thumb:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Nash wrote:
    Long-term ecstasy use is already known to be harmful.

    Is it? To whom? This baseless statement nicely show's up the BBC reporting of drugs. The evidence is mixed to say the least.
    Nash wrote:
    Lead researcher Maartje de Win said: "We do not know if these effects are transient or permanent.

    "Therefore, we cannot conclude that ecstasy, even in small doses, is safe for the brain, and people should be informed of this risk."

    Ask any scientist to say absolutely anything is 'safe' and they will tell you its impossible.
    Nash wrote:
    Research has shown that long-term or heavy ecstasy use can damage neurons and cause depression, anxiety, confusion, difficulty sleeping and decrease memory.

    Well, sort of, that is certainly what appears to happen, though why it happens to some and not others and how much it is the MDMA is up for debate.
  • Options
    JadedJaded Posts: 2,682 Boards Guru
    The Guardian ran a story on it yesterday too, Ecstasy harms brain on first use, study finds.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Just thought it would be worth a mention as I've not seen much in the news about ecstacy recently.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    This kind of thing always worries me because my memory is shit as it is and I need it to be good in my final year of uni!
    I'd be interested to look at the actual study to see the specifics like the criterion for the sample and the significance of the results etc. Surely there are so many other factors that can affect blood flow to areas of the brain, I just don't understand how they could single it out to be the effect of ecstacy.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Another question...how badly does alcohol affect the memory then..to a more or lesser extent than ecstacy? I don't mean in the short term after a night out, just in general.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Nash wrote:
    Research has shown that long-term or heavy ecstasy use can damage neurons and cause depression, anxiety, confusion, difficulty sleeping and decrease memory.
    as has research for alcohol consumption, mobile phone use, etc etc etc
    how many times have we heard similar?!!! ...
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    otter wrote:
    as has research for alcohol consumption, mobile phone use, etc etc etc
    how many times have we heard similar?!!! ...

    Tells you something about either the scientists or progressing technology...

    I feel like this is just some slanted lab work to give ecstasy a bad name. They do this with every drug. It's like an "acid burning holes in your brain" theory. It is just in response to the massive use of MDMA.
    I know around here, a lot of the times pills aren't even amphetamines, and alot aren't vasoconstrictive.
    But bloodflow in the brain is so dependent on alot of things. They only tested these people twice, and they only tested a few people. This is hardly enough evidence to come to conclusions with.
Sign In or Register to comment.