If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
Vote for the Paedophile Party!
BillieTheBot
Posts: 8,721 Bot
Dutch paedophiles launch political party
Dutch paedophiles are launching a political party to push for a cut in the legal age for sexual relations to 12 from 16 and the legalisation of child pornography and sex with animals, sparking widespread outrage.
The Charity, Freedom and Diversity (NVD) party said on its web site it would be officially registered on Wednesday, proclaiming: "We are going to shake The Hague awake!"
The party said it wanted to cut the legal age for sexual relations to 12 and eventually scrap the limit altogether.
"A ban just makes children curious," Ad van den Berg, one of the party's founders, told the Algemeen Dagblad (AD) newspaper.
Toddlers should be given sex education and youths aged 16 and up should be allowed to appear in pornographic films and prostitute themselves. Sex with animals should be allowed although abuse of animals should remain illegal, the NVD said.
The party also said everybody should be allowed to go naked in public and promotes legalising all soft and hard drugs and free train travel for all.
Full article and more details here
So the million dollar question is: if some tried to set up such a party here, would you want them banned from forming it or would you allow it?
A very tricky question... I'm undecided as it is. Would probably, and very relunctantly agree to its formation provided they limit their language and claims- i.e. simply campaigning for a change in the law, but not spreading any bullshit claims and not targetting of children during any campaign.
Beep boop. I'm a bot.
0
Comments
"We want to get into parliament so we have a voice. Other politicians only talk about us in a negative sense, as if we were criminals," Van den Berg said.
:eek2:
hmmmm....maybe because they ARE criminals?
haha what the fuck? so it's all good if the animals say yes eh?
This is quite wrong. Children DON'T know, they are NOT really responsible at that age yet.
Laws exist for a reason, ya know. This is just a bit sick.
Like it'll get anywhere though.
There seems to be some link to NAMBLA in the US
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NAMBLA
which while an extremely distasteful organisation is still legal.
I thought that was just a piss take in South Park. :eek2:
For their own safety some would ban them. I wouldn't.
It's interesting that pederasty was once acceptable in various societies, Graeco-Roman and Aztec societies obviously but there's still no place for what NAMBLA advocate in a civilised modern society...The libertarian ethic should always apply to matters of sexual ethics. Anything where it's all consensual is generally OK but where mature and free consent cannot be given (as the case with children) it's absolutely wrong in all circumstances.
NAMBLA interestingly at some points in its history had close links with the gay rights movement, or rather it was actually part of the gay rights movement for a while. Although then again some would say you did not see many 16 and 17 year old teenagers out campaigning for a reduction in the age of consent, plenty of bearded 50 year olds though. Not sure I know of many young people campaigning for a reduction in the age of consent to 14 either but that has still not stopped Peter Tatchell.
Sexy children.
Is that a subtle way of saying that shops shouldnt sell provocative clothes, such as thongs, to pre-teen markets?
Or just a joke?
sit the paedophile down and say you can be a paedophile but dont let those urges overtake you?
allowing paedophiles to watch child porn isn't acceptable either because some poor little child has to be filmed, etc and child porn could be the step on the ladder towards molestering?
i think it should be nipped in the bud, quickly
usual i'm a liberal and all for freedom of speech, i hate hat the BNP stand for but unfortunately they have the same right as me to speak, but paedophilia is putting the most innocent at risk
Sorry, I have nothing real to contribute to the debate.
This bit genuinely made me laugh out loud. You can almost imagine the after-thought happening!
"Hmmm, don't want to seem like a bunch of sexual deviants, better throw in some free train travel"
I was in Amsterdam over Easter weekend and the both the trams and trains were very punctual.
I am, however, going to travel a 160 miles by train this weekend for the princly sum of £28, no doubt having to change in London and get on numerous tube trains. God, i hate England's train service. :grump:
But really... form a political party? :eek2: I would guess first they'd try to change the law... If they want to form a party only to change those laws... then they haven't understood what a political party is about.
The agenda this political party has is obviously a scary one - but it will never be met, and hopefully by people who do have those kind of... leanings... (im being careful with my words here) being able to talk about it more, perhaps there is more scope for getting mental issues out in the open.
Maybe?
i doubt the kids have much of a voice in paedo circles
They don't have a political voice at all, which is the point here.
I'd vote for them.
Nahhhh.
That is a worrying idea.
Either way, as I said, it is unlikley they'll get anywhere. And I daresay Germany would invade them again if they got voted in.