Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨

Pathetic tosser refuses to admit defeat

Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi is refusing to admit defeat in last week's Italian election despite a court ruling in favour of his opponents.
The Supreme Court has confirmed a narrow win for the centre-left opposition led by Romano Prodi.

But after a meeting with his advisers, Mr Berlusconi let it be known he was considering a further legal challenge.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4925118.stm

My heart bleeds for the Italian soon to be ex-PM.

Perhaps he and also-soon-to-be-out-of-office Tony Blair can set up home together somewhere.
Beep boop. I'm a bot.

Comments

  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Let him waste his money on expensive lawyers.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Aye, second that.

    The corrupt tosser clearly has more money than sense, but it won't buy him another term this time.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    His reaction just proves how much Italy needs somebody else in office.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    yeah, he just needs go on whinging for another six years about how the election was stolen and he'll match the American Democrats :thumb:
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Only in the case of the American Democrats they're telling the truth and about half the country thinks so.

    In Italy however it's just Berlusconi himself who claims that any irregularities have taken place. And then even he knows that no irregularities took place.

    Massive difference.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    He will be back in the next election after non-stop media critisism of the new PM.

    Did i mention Berlusconi owns the Italian media? He does.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Aladdin wrote:
    Only in the case of the American Democrats they're telling the truth and about half the country thinks so.

    2000 was admittedly close and there were irregularities that affected Gore and Bush - in Florida. McLaughin & Associates noted that the TV news media by calling the state for Gore at around 7.48pm EST while voters in the western panhandle (in the Central Time Zone) potentially suppressed the heavily Republican panhandle vote. The media also incorrectly announced that polls were closed in Florida whilst polls in the panhandle were still open. This the McLaughin survey estimated; the media announcements of closed poll and a Gore victory cost Bush a margin of 5,000 votes – and the confusion led to as many as 15,000 not voting. 2000 was so close that even if Gore had got it I think there would have been doubts on the legitimacy of his victory.

    However, the 2002 midterms in which Bush campaigned hard for resulted in a bigger Republican majority in the House and Republicans winning back the Senate. And in 2004 Bush obviously comfortably defeated Kerry. Clearly a pretty clear mandate for Bush.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Even if we ignore the voting machines irregularties of the 2004 election, the fact remains that Bush should have not been the President then.

    The 2000 result was a fraud. As well as the miscounting irregularities, up to 70,000 black people (90% of which vote Democrat) were illegally removed from the voting register in Florida.

    Bush should have been in jail in 2004 with his brother Jeb, not fighting for re-election from the Oval Office.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Aladdin wrote:
    The 2000 result was a fraud. As well as the miscounting irregularities, up to 70,000 black people (90% of which vote Democrat) were illegally removed from the voting register in Florida.

    Miscounting irregularities will have inevitably affected Bush and Gore.

    Where do you get 70,000 from? I think you've got your numbers wrong. If someone is convicted of a felony they’re not allowed to vote in many states. 57,700 'ex-felons' were removed from the electoral roll – of this figure 8,000 were in fact not felons at all and were erroneously removed. Figures from Greg Palast

    Interesting piece from the New York Times on Democrats and Republicans who want to stop disenfranchising ex-prisoners.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Prodi is just as corrupt, they're both cunts. Its all bad news for Italy, again.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Aladdin wrote:
    Even if we ignore the voting machines irregularties of the 2004 election, the fact remains that Bush should have not been the President then.

    The 2000 result was a fraud. As well as the miscounting irregularities, up to 70,000 black people (90% of which vote Democrat) were illegally removed from the voting register in Florida.

    Bush should have been in jail in 2004 with his brother Jeb, not fighting for re-election from the Oval Office.

    Yes, but strange how the media concentrate less on the US servicemen who were unable to vote - funnily enough the majority who vote Republican.

    And given the past record of Italian elections I wouldn't be suprised if there has been fraud (committed by all sides as well as I suspect) - though whether the top people are involved this time is a different matter.
Sign In or Register to comment.