If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
So, in "Blagsta's Ideal", class would still exist?
If not then perhaps you would like to cover the point being made - assuming that you don't miss it by a country mile again.
Just a little quote fromthat helpfull pamphle
"Nevertheless, it remains the case that class retains a
distinctive centrality within the Marxist tradition and is called upon to do much more arduous explanatory work than in other theoretical traditions. Indeed, a good argument can be made that this, along with a specific orientation to radically egalitarian normative principles, is a large part of
what defines the remaining distinctiveness and vitality of the Marxist tradition as a body of thought, particularly within sociology. It is for this reason that I have argued that “Marxism as class analysis” defines the core agenda of Marxist sociology"
Talking about talking about class struggle.
I’ve read most of that over 90% of it is explaining terms and concepts with little or no relation to the reality on the ground, in the few brief practical things it says it then quickly return to a convoluted explanation of explanations having nothing to do with reality and every thing to do with intellectual debates amongst middle class Marxists.
Eh? Where did you get that from?
I don't know what point you're making.
Sorry, what? It is totally grounded in reality. It is about how economics and labour are organised. You can't get anymore real than that.
What is your criticism exactly?
If it isn't, why are all these groups racing to become at the top?
What real, structural difference is there between a totalitarian uber state and a monarchy or any other form of governance.
That's a difference in content, not in the process. How about you just answer those simple questions I put to you befoe we move on?
'tis true, i am using some of the ideas from NLP to look at politics. Did you know, for instance that fears all have the same structure, but can have different content? Btw, if you think NLP is simplistic, you haven't a clue about it. Every tried unravelling a double bind? Probably not because you wouldn't even see one in the first place. :rolleyes:
For a start, complicated things are just lots of simple things stacked together. Answer those questions I asked and the we will see what sort of mental gymnastice you can get up to making something simple like, "one man using force to get what he wants from another man" into something complicated. :rolleyes:
There are no grey areas. Grey is just black and white seen from a distance.
:yes:
So, if they are so shit hot at understanding how economics work, why haven't they done the logical thing, and used their expert understanding to overcome the "capitalists" at their own game, and bought everyone freedom already?