If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
Essential support for under 25s
Essential support for under 25s
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
Starting with the much-overdue question about oral sex.
Troll.
What is the "Jewish element", morrismarina? On the subject of anti-semitism and discussion of neocons, it is clear for some that "neocons and shady cabals" is just a more modern variant of ZOG (Zionist Occupied Government) for anti-semitic tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theory nutters.
And it was a UN response not a US... which is why there were British, Belgiums, Turks and many others fighting the North Koreans and Chinese rather than just the US.
End shot is that South Korea is prosperous and not a bad place to live. North korea is hell on earth. Its not a shame that the UN intervened, but that there intervention wasn't more succesful.
There are plenty of Republicans (mainly paleoconservatives) who dislike the Neocons as much as you do, Aladdin.
Alot get quite annoyed when people call neoconservatives conservative.
I'm curious myself about the Jewish element, why are the neocons almost all Jewish, and why do Jews overwhelmingly endorse racist double standards for Israel versus the US or Britain.
Yea as I said the ZOGer's love the neocon Jewish element. They couldn't love it if there wasn't an identifiable Jewish element, could they?
yea there is...the ariel isn't pointing in the right direction
Following their line of nonreasoning, our most powerful political, military and industry leaders and the intimately linked organisations and institutions over which which preside couldn't be hiding anything more significant than their friday night poker games behind the oft evoked stone wall of "national security".
For those who spend their days with their eyes open and who are not willfully blinded by slavish adherence to ideology, the facts and their effects are not so easily wished away.
Ol Duv and the neocons he so admires are the ones living in a world of self-induced fantasy. They lie so regularly to the public to pursue their illicit ends that theyve come to believe those lies as well. Clinically speaking, that amounts to a serious pathology.
what racist double standards?
Have you ever entertained the fact that it is YOU who are blinded by conspiracy theories?
what conspiracy theory is this? it's part of clandestines job to study foreign policy, whats actually going on in the world, behind the scenes and all...i'll bleieve him any day over you and your"it's just a conspiracy theory" excuse of explaining things...
That you resort to the typical derision of those who have no interest to pursue the truth of any matter with your snappy "tin foil hat" quip, demonstrates clearly enough which of us prefers to live in delusion.
is it a deliberate delusion though...do they realise the extent of their folly or are they realy that stupid...i'm not sure myself...
Arrogance
Of course not. He is "right", so why should he?
He appears to expect others here to reconsider their opinions based on what he says but apparently the reverse is irrelevant. You are, my friend, wasting your time.
Yet defence of warmongering ideologues such as you seem to increasingly demonstrate, is humility.
Interesting indeed.
You go right on ahead and side with the public opinion bandwagon, as fickle and easily manipulated as it is, I'll side with the consistent application of principle and historic actualities. Far more stable footing when it comes to judging agendas, policies and the events arising therefrom.
Could be that it is his job - and he has often claimed so. Thing is he has never elaborated on what it is he actually does in this job...
As a student it is also my job to analyse - doesn't mean that I stand behind published reports read by Chirac and Blair
If you have to ask then you arent as attentive to current events nor obviously well read on their agenda, which has been recommended reading countless times over, as you should be if you place any value in truth. Guess you are too busy posting one line snippets and debate-deadening monikers to educate yourself with a little timely research.
Let us start with the historic resurgence of contrived events meant to traumatise a nation into pursuits of war of aggression - aka " the war which will not end in our lifetime" (their words, not mine). Let us then proceed to examination of their "War on Terror" which has already been repeatedly exposed as a smokescreen for invading and re-engineering key resource rich nations, long targetted by this present ruling cabal.
Then perhaps one could recommend you examine the frightening truth that this "war on terror" relies on media inflated reports about persons against whom no credible evidence of "terrorism" exists, thus the need to circumvent or otherwise dispense with all due process of law and public transparency (always in the name of "national security" of course) in order to perpetuate the fearmongering myths. Dig too deep and you might even discover that a significant number of the targets are actually legitimate opponents of the dictatorial regimes with whom these Neocons are more than happy to maintain friendly relations (co-option when it serves, conquest when it fails). A real testament to the hollow rhetoric of "democratisation" and "liberation" into the noncritical bandwagon mentality happily buys.
But then, why look so far afield when further examples exist right here in our societies, where these liars and fearmongers are erecting invasive surveillance mechanisms and steadily abrogating all Constitutional safeguards so as to make it all the easier, as time passes, to quash all organised dissent that might threaten their aims.
As for the Zionist connection, you missed the key architects of the neocon hijacking of Washington, Wolfowitz, Perle, Feith, Elliott Abrams, David Frum, Irving Kristol (often referred to as a founding godfather of the movement's core ideological positions) and his son William Kristol. All hardcore Likudnik zionists in key positions of power and influence inside the beltway and all linked to key Israeli-centric interests. A clear case of conflict of national interests and loyalties if ever there was one.
Suffice to say that others here demonstrate all too clearly that the extent of their enquiry and comprehension of political realities goes no further than mainstream headline news or worse, tabloid journalism.
And you have posted sites with uncredited sources. So what's worse?
Unfortunately, being the hardcore Zionist and apartheid apologist that you are, you have never ceased to excuse the historically factual atrocities committed (and even boasted of) by your ideological forebears and continued to this day.
It seems more like you side with lunatics and conspiracy theorists, to be honest.
Your theories lack any sort of credibility.
I refer to my earlier commentary on those who constantly allude to "theories".
I don't think we're talking about the same website.
And could you please stop being so demeaning? It doesn't suit you.
Why am I evasive? Can you try explaing that without using creative adjectives.
For fuck's sake. Clandestine is everything you might want in a poster. Articulate, erudite, knowledgable. The fact he wastes so much time on here, knowing that only a part (at best) of what is written will hit home should be proof of his sincerity.
You might not agree with the analysis, but you have to admire the thought and education that goes into it. It far outweighs anyone else I see posting regularly on here. Tbh only Blagsta comes close, and he is pulling the stars down to earth more by sheer rage and persistence than by any academic gifts.
I wish I could match such erudition in my own posts, it would serve me so much better than my cack-handed attempts to stimulate thought.
In all seriousness... No, I don't admire his style at all.
He does everything he criticises others for. He has no sense of rhetorics, and the fact that I downright disagree with him, doesn't help either.
Not even impressed by his language. He doesn't know how to consstruct sentences systematically and his vocabulary might be big, but he doesn't know how to use it properly. It's not professional language, if that is what he is aiming for.