If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
The S*n supports Blair
BillieTheBot
Posts: 8,721 Bot
I'm surprised 'nobody' has started a thread over this already...
So the Scum has gone and declared its support for Labour once more. This despite a clear flirtation with Michael Howard regarding immigration, tax and gypsy wars.
I think it all simply comes down to the fact that the S*n likes to support a winning horse. In 1997 it was clear as rain that the Tories were going to lose so like a rat abandoning a sinking ship the 'paper' switched allegiance to Labour. It declared early for Labour in 2001 as well. This time round it was undecided for one reason only: for a while it looked as if the Tories had a chance. Like someone was saying in the Guardian the other week- and has he been proved right!- the decision on who the S*n would support would not be taken until Murdoch takes a good look at all the opinion polls and a likely winner becomes apparent.
Because we all know how the 'rag' likes to claim that "It was the S*n wot won it"- even though it is absolute bollocks, even in 1992 IMO.
So the Scum has gone and declared its support for Labour once more. This despite a clear flirtation with Michael Howard regarding immigration, tax and gypsy wars.
I think it all simply comes down to the fact that the S*n likes to support a winning horse. In 1997 it was clear as rain that the Tories were going to lose so like a rat abandoning a sinking ship the 'paper' switched allegiance to Labour. It declared early for Labour in 2001 as well. This time round it was undecided for one reason only: for a while it looked as if the Tories had a chance. Like someone was saying in the Guardian the other week- and has he been proved right!- the decision on who the S*n would support would not be taken until Murdoch takes a good look at all the opinion polls and a likely winner becomes apparent.
Because we all know how the 'rag' likes to claim that "It was the S*n wot won it"- even though it is absolute bollocks, even in 1992 IMO.
Beep boop. I'm a bot.
0
Comments
Sadly Littledick's rant is nowhere to be found online. Could anyone who buys that organ tell us what he's saying?
But then they would have to admit to actually spending money on that rag.
No, they supported it. But to be fair they said they would not have acted on such dodgy advice. or somthing.
"or something" LOL!
I'd ignore the fat bastard at any rate. The S*n's claims that it has the power to win and lose elections for people are laughable.
He's arguing that Blair doesn't deserve another chance, and lists the reasons why. I can't remember what he said about the Tories, but then I didn't read it too deeply- the newsagent gets a bit shitty when you read a paper on the shelf
It is fair enough really, I always put S*n, same principle..........